# Domain Lookup Tree ### by Jason A. Donenfeld () Some applications, like [dnsmasq](http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html), need to find the closest-match domain name. One way is by iterating through a list of domains and finding the one that has the longest length match. But a more efficient way is to build a tree of domain name components. This project provides a very simple C API for a domain name matching tree. The **[source code is simple, extremely well commented, and easy to read](http://git.zx2c4.com/domain-lookup-tree/tree/domain-lookup.c)**. ## API #### `struct domain_lookup_tree* init_dlt()` Constructs a new tree head and returns a pointer to it. #### `void* find_dlt(struct domain_lookup_tree *head, const char *domain)` Returns the prior inserted data in `head` for a given `domain`. #### `int insert_dlt(struct domain_lookup_tree *head, const char *domain, void *data)` Inserts `data` into a tree given by `head` for a given `domain`. If `domain` has length of zero or is equal to `#`, it will act as the default match for non-matching lookups. ## Example struct domain_lookup_tree *domains = init_dlt(); insert_dlt(domains, "zx2c4.com", "zx2c4 root node"); insert_dlt(domains, "data.zx2c4.com", "zx2c4 data node"); insert_dlt(domains, "yahoo.co.uk", "yahoo.co.uk node"); insert_dlt(domains, "#", "generic node"); char *data = find_dlt(domains, "cheese.somewhere.zx2c4.com"); printf("zx2c4 root node == %s\n", data); ## Benchmarks With gcc 4.7.2 on an Intel Core i7-3820QM, we show a **~587x speed improvement** over dnsmasq's old algorithm: zx2c4@thinkpad ~/Projects/domain-lookup-tree $ make cc -march=native -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -flto -O3 benchmark.c domain-lookup.c domain-lookup.h -o benchmark zx2c4@thinkpad ~/Projects/domain-lookup-tree $ ./benchmark [+] Populating in-memory word list from /usr/share/dict/words. [+] Truncating in-memory word list to 300 random words. [+] Creating random lists of 100000 domains to insert and 100000 domains to query. [+] Populating domain lookup tree. [+] Performing lookup benchmarks: [*] New method took 0.34 seconds. [*] Old method took 199.45 seconds. [*] The new method is 586.617647 times faster than the old method. [+] Verifying that new and old methods produced identical results: [*] New and old methods produced the same results. ## Limitations & Improvements * Currently no helper functions for removing and freeing nodes * Instead of `strcmp`'ing, a hash function could be used