linux-dev/tools/testing/selftests/net/toeplitz.c, branch linus/masterLinux kernel development work - see feature brancheshttps://git.zx2c4.com/linux-dev/atom/tools/testing/selftests/net/toeplitz.c?h=linus%2Fmaster2022-03-17T14:21:16Zselftests: net: fix array_size.cocci warning2022-03-17T14:21:16ZGuo Zhengkuiguozhengkui@vivo.com2022-03-16T09:28:57Zurn:sha1:1abea24af42c35c6eb537e4402836e2cde2a5b13
Fix array_size.cocci warning in tools/testing/selftests/net.
Use `ARRAY_SIZE(arr)` instead of forms like `sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0])`.
It has been tested with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220316092858.9398-1-guozhengkui@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
selftests/net: toeplitz: fix udp option2021-12-13T14:37:15ZWillem de Bruijnwillemb@google.com2021-12-11T19:30:31Zurn:sha1:a8d13611b4a7b1b20d17bf2b9a89a3efcabde56c
Tiny fix. Option -u ("use udp") does not take an argument.
It can cause the next argument to silently be ignored.
Fixes: 5ebfb4cc3048 ("selftests/net: toeplitz test")
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
selftests/net: toeplitz test2021-08-05T12:14:09ZCoco Lilixiaoyan@google.com2021-08-05T07:36:41Zurn:sha1:5ebfb4cc3048380b43506ffc71b9cf8b83128989
To verify that this hash implements the Toeplitz hash function.
Additionally, provide a script toeplitz.sh to run the test in loopback mode
on a networking device of choice (see setup_loopback.sh). Since the
script modifies the NIC setup, it will not be run by selftests
automatically.
Tested:
./toeplitz.sh -i eth0 -irq_prefix <eth0_pattern> -t -6
carrier ready
rxq 0: cpu 14
rxq 1: cpu 20
rxq 2: cpu 17
rxq 3: cpu 23
cpu 14: rx_hash 0x69103ebc [saddr fda8::2 daddr fda8::1 sport 58938 dport 8000] OK rxq 0 (cpu 14)
...
cpu 20: rx_hash 0x257118b9 [saddr fda8::2 daddr fda8::1 sport 59258 dport 8000] OK rxq 1 (cpu 20)
count: pass=111 nohash=0 fail=0
Test Succeeded!
Signed-off-by: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>