diff options
| author |   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> | 2020-05-26 18:17:13 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2020-06-01 09:36:07 -0600 |
| commit | e35b5a4c494a75a683ddf4901a43e0a128d5bfe3 (patch) | |
| tree | 8eb13c4c7cb307d9e9479f31efb50f269a256255 /Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | |
| parent | zswap: docs/vm: Fix typo accept_threshold_percent in zswap.rst (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-e35b5a4c494a75a683ddf4901a43e0a128d5bfe3.tar.xz linux-dev-e35b5a4c494a75a683ddf4901a43e0a128d5bfe3.zip | |
Documentation: fixes to the maintainer-entry-profile template
Do some wordsmithing and copy editing on the maintainer-entry-profile
profile (template, guide):
- fix punctuation
- fix some wording
- use "-rc" consistently
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fbaa9b67-e7b8-d5e8-ecbb-6ae068234880@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst index 11ebe3682771..77e43c8b24b4 100644 --- a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst +++ b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ The Maintainer Entry Profile supplements the top-level process documents (submitting-patches, submitting drivers...) with subsystem/device-driver-local customs as well as details about the patch submission life-cycle. A contributor uses this document to level set -their expectations and avoid common mistakes, maintainers may use these +their expectations and avoid common mistakes; maintainers may use these profiles to look across subsystems for opportunities to converge on common practices. @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Example questions to consider: - Does the subsystem have a patchwork instance? Are patchwork state changes notified? - Any bots or CI infrastructure that watches the list, or automated - testing feedback that the subsystem gates acceptance? + testing feedback that the subsystem uses to gate acceptance? - Git branches that are pulled into -next? - What branch should contributors submit against? - Links to any other Maintainer Entry Profiles? For example a @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ One of the common misunderstandings of submitters is that patches can be sent at any time before the merge window closes and can still be considered for the next -rc1. The reality is that most patches need to be settled in soaking in linux-next in advance of the merge window -opening. Clarify for the submitter the key dates (in terms rc release -week) that patches might considered for merging and when patches need to +opening. Clarify for the submitter the key dates (in terms of -rc release +week) that patches might be considered for merging and when patches need to wait for the next -rc. At a minimum: - Last -rc for new feature submissions: @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ wait for the next -rc. At a minimum: - Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions Indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch set will need to wait for the NEXT+1 merge window. Of course there is no - obligation to ever except any given patchset, but if the review has not - concluded by this point the expectation the contributor should wait and + obligation to ever accept any given patchset, but if the review has not + concluded by this point the expectation is the contributor should wait and resubmit for the following merge window. Optional: |