|author||Rafael J. Wysocki <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2015-03-06 01:29:05 +0100|
|committer||Rafael J. Wysocki <email@example.com>||2015-03-06 01:29:05 +0100|
|parent||Merge branch 'suspend-to-idle' (diff)|
|parent||genirq / PM: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND (diff)|
Merge branch 'irq-pm'
* irq-pm: genirq / PM: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND tty: serial: atmel: rework interrupt and wakeup handling watchdog: at91sam9: request the irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND clk: at91: implement suspend/resume for the PMC irqchip rtc: at91rm9200: rework wakeup and interrupt handling rtc: at91sam9: rework wakeup and interrupt handling PM / wakeup: export pm_system_wakeup symbol genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines genirq / PM: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.txt b/Documentation/power/suspend-and-interrupts.txt
index 2f9c5a5fcb25..8afb29a8604a 100644
@@ -40,8 +40,10 @@ but also to IPIs and to some other special-purpose interrupts.
The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag is used to indicate that to the IRQ subsystem when
requesting a special-purpose interrupt. It causes suspend_device_irqs() to
-leave the corresponding IRQ enabled so as to allow the interrupt to work all
-the time as expected.
+leave the corresponding IRQ enabled so as to allow the interrupt to work as
+expected during the suspend-resume cycle, but does not guarantee that the
+interrupt will wake the system from a suspended state -- for such cases it is
+necessary to use enable_irq_wake().
Note that the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag affects the entire IRQ and not just one
user of it. Thus, if the IRQ is shared, all of the interrupt handlers installed
@@ -110,8 +112,9 @@ any special interrupt handling logic for it to work.
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and enable_irq_wake()
-There are no valid reasons to use both enable_irq_wake() and the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
-flag on the same IRQ.
+There are very few valid reasons to use both enable_irq_wake() and the
+IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag on the same IRQ, and it is never valid to use both for the
First of all, if the IRQ is not shared, the rules for handling IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
interrupts (interrupt handlers are invoked after suspend_device_irqs()) are
@@ -120,4 +123,13 @@ handlers are not invoked after suspend_device_irqs()).
Second, both enable_irq_wake() and IRQF_NO_SUSPEND apply to entire IRQs and not
to individual interrupt handlers, so sharing an IRQ between a system wakeup
-interrupt source and an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupt source does not make sense.
+interrupt source and an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupt source does not generally
+In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
+IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
+must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
+the latter to the core with pm_system_wakeup()), must use enable_irq_wake() to
+ensure that the IRQ will function as a wakeup source, and must request the IRQ
+with IRQF_COND_SUSPEND to tell the core that it meets these requirements. If
+these requirements are not met, it is not valid to use IRQF_COND_SUSPEND.