x86/uaccess: Move copy_user_handle_tail() into asm

By writing the function in asm we avoid cross object code flow and
objtool no longer gets confused about a 'stray' CLAC.

Also; the asm version is actually _simpler_.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c
index ee42bb0cbeb3..9952a01cad24 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c
@@ -55,26 +55,6 @@ unsigned long clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_user);
 
 /*
- * Try to copy last bytes and clear the rest if needed.
- * Since protection fault in copy_from/to_user is not a normal situation,
- * it is not necessary to optimize tail handling.
- */
-__visible unsigned long
-copy_user_handle_tail(char *to, char *from, unsigned len)
-{
-	for (; len; --len, to++) {
-		char c;
-
-		if (__get_user_nocheck(c, from++, sizeof(char)))
-			break;
-		if (__put_user_nocheck(c, to, sizeof(char)))
-			break;
-	}
-	clac();
-	return len;
-}
-
-/*
  * Similar to copy_user_handle_tail, probe for the write fault point,
  * but reuse __memcpy_mcsafe in case a new read error is encountered.
  * clac() is handled in _copy_to_iter_mcsafe().