aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>2019-07-04 17:24:47 +0200
committerLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>2019-09-06 15:52:05 +0300
commitfe69b7d1243a42fedee944e873e80456a743c964 (patch)
tree94edc949a65ed288b9f3368b0b03eaa8be477fd6 /drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c
parentiwlwifi: mvm: drop BA sessions on too many old-SN frames (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-fe69b7d1243a42fedee944e873e80456a743c964.tar.xz
linux-dev-fe69b7d1243a42fedee944e873e80456a743c964.zip
iwlwifi: mvm: handle BAR_FRAME_RELEASE (0xc2) notification
In prior hardware generations (e.g. 9000 series), we received the BAR frame with fake NSSN information to handle releasing frames from the reorder buffer for the default queue, the other queues were getting the FRAME_RELEASE notification in this case. With multi-TID block-ack, the firmware no longer sends us the BAR frame because the fake RX is quite big (just the metadata is around 48 bytes or so). Instead, it now sends us one (or multiple) special release notifications (0xc2). The hardware consumes these as well, but only generates the FRAME_RELEASE (0xc3) for queues other than the default queue. We thus need to handle them in the same way we handle the normal FRAME_RELEASE. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c
index f3f9e641ae70..c48d6fb16408 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c
@@ -2014,3 +2014,42 @@ void iwl_mvm_rx_frame_release(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct napi_struct *napi,
le16_to_cpu(release->nssn),
queue, 0);
}
+
+void iwl_mvm_rx_bar_frame_release(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct napi_struct *napi,
+ struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb, int queue)
+{
+ struct iwl_rx_packet *pkt = rxb_addr(rxb);
+ struct iwl_bar_frame_release *release = (void *)pkt->data;
+ unsigned int baid = le32_get_bits(release->ba_info,
+ IWL_BAR_FRAME_RELEASE_BAID_MASK);
+ unsigned int nssn = le32_get_bits(release->ba_info,
+ IWL_BAR_FRAME_RELEASE_NSSN_MASK);
+ unsigned int sta_id = le32_get_bits(release->sta_tid,
+ IWL_BAR_FRAME_RELEASE_STA_MASK);
+ unsigned int tid = le32_get_bits(release->sta_tid,
+ IWL_BAR_FRAME_RELEASE_TID_MASK);
+ struct iwl_mvm_baid_data *baid_data;
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(baid == IWL_RX_REORDER_DATA_INVALID_BAID ||
+ baid >= ARRAY_SIZE(mvm->baid_map)))
+ return;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ baid_data = rcu_dereference(mvm->baid_map[baid]);
+ if (!baid_data) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_RX(mvm,
+ "Got valid BAID %d but not allocated, invalid BAR release!\n",
+ baid);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (WARN(tid != baid_data->tid || sta_id != baid_data->sta_id,
+ "baid 0x%x is mapped to sta:%d tid:%d, but BAR release received for sta:%d tid:%d\n",
+ baid, baid_data->sta_id, baid_data->tid, sta_id,
+ tid))
+ goto out;
+
+ iwl_mvm_release_frames_from_notif(mvm, napi, baid, nssn, queue, 0);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}