aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/thermal
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>2022-08-18 10:23:15 +0200
committerDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>2022-10-04 11:20:59 +0200
commit31fd4b9db13b1877b20426e79ac7fec606587872 (patch)
tree214869c78590d5dd750739c6b16f85da848b9fad /drivers/thermal
parentMerge branches 'thermal-intel' and 'thermal-drivers' (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-31fd4b9db13b1877b20426e79ac7fec606587872.tar.xz
linux-dev-31fd4b9db13b1877b20426e79ac7fec606587872.zip
thermal/drivers/imx_sc: Rely on the platform data to get the resource id
Currently the imx_sc driver is reimplementing part of the thermal zone parsing from the thermal OF tree code to get the sensor id associated with a thermal zone sensor. The driver platform specific code should know what sensor is present and not rely on the thermal zone description to do a discovery. Well that is arguable but all the other drivers have a per platform data telling what sensor id to use. The imx_sc thermal driver is the only one using a different approach. Not invalid but forcing to keep a specific function 'thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id()' to get the sensor id for a specific thermal zone as the self-explanatory function tells and having device tree code inside the driver. The thermal OF code had a rework and remains now self-encapsulated with a register/unregister functions and their 'devm' variants, except for the function mentioned above. After investigating, it appears the imx_sc sensor is defined in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi: which defines the cpu-thermal zone with the id: IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM This dtsi is included by: - imx8qxp-ai_ml.dts - imx8qxp-colibri.dtsi - imx8qxp-mek.dts The two first ones do not define more thermal zones The third one adds the pmic-thermal0 zone with id: IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0 The thermal OF code returns -ENODEV if the thermal zone registration with a specific id fails because the description is not available in the DT for such a sensor id. In this case we continue with the other ids without bailing out with an error. So we can build for the 'fsl,imx-sc-thermal' a compatible data, an array of sensor ids containing IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM and IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0. The latter won't be found but that will not result in an error but a normal case where we continue the initialization with other ids. Just to clarify, it is what the thermal framework does and what the other drivers are expecting: when a registration fails with -ENODEV this is not an error but a case where the description is not found in the device tree, that be can the entire thermal zones description or a specific thermal zone with an unknown id. There is one small functional change but without impact. When there is no 'thermal-zones' description the probe function was returning '-ENODEV', now it returns zero. When a thermal zone fails to register with an error different from '-ENODEV', the error is detected and returned. Change the code accordingly and remove the OF code from the driver. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220818082316.2717095-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/thermal')
-rw-r--r--drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c68
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
index 10bfa6507eb4..5d92b70a5d53 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/imx_sc_thermal.c
@@ -76,59 +76,55 @@ static const struct thermal_zone_device_ops imx_sc_thermal_ops = {
static int imx_sc_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np;
struct imx_sc_sensor *sensor;
- int ret;
+ const int *resource_id;
+ int i, ret;
ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&thermal_ipc_handle);
if (ret)
return ret;
- np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
- if (!np)
- return -ENODEV;
+ resource_id = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!resource_id)
+ return -EINVAL;
- sensor_np = of_node_get(pdev->dev.of_node);
+ for (i = 0; resource_id[i] > 0; i++) {
- for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
sensor = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!sensor) {
- of_node_put(child);
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto put_node;
- }
+ if (!sensor)
+ return -ENOMEM;
- ret = thermal_zone_of_get_sensor_id(child,
- sensor_np,
- &sensor->resource_id);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev,
- "failed to get valid sensor resource id: %d\n",
- ret);
- of_node_put(child);
- break;
- }
+ sensor->resource_id = resource_id[i];
- sensor->tzd = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(&pdev->dev,
- sensor->resource_id,
- sensor,
- &imx_sc_thermal_ops);
+ sensor->tzd = devm_thermal_of_zone_register(&pdev->dev, sensor->resource_id,
+ sensor, &imx_sc_thermal_ops);
if (IS_ERR(sensor->tzd)) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register thermal zone\n");
+ /*
+ * Save the error value before freeing the
+ * sensor pointer, otherwise we endup with a
+ * use-after-free error
+ */
ret = PTR_ERR(sensor->tzd);
- of_node_put(child);
- break;
+
+ devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, sensor);
+
+ /*
+ * The thermal framework notifies us there is
+ * no thermal zone description for such a
+ * sensor id
+ */
+ if (ret == -ENODEV)
+ continue;
+
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register thermal zone\n");
+ return ret;
}
if (devm_thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(sensor->tzd))
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to add hwmon sysfs attributes\n");
}
-put_node:
- of_node_put(sensor_np);
- of_node_put(np);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int imx_sc_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -136,8 +132,10 @@ static int imx_sc_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
+static int imx_sc_sensors[] = { IMX_SC_R_SYSTEM, IMX_SC_R_PMIC_0, -1 };
+
static const struct of_device_id imx_sc_thermal_table[] = {
- { .compatible = "fsl,imx-sc-thermal", },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx-sc-thermal", .data = imx_sc_sensors },
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_sc_thermal_table);