aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>2022-03-29 01:56:09 -0700
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2022-05-16 17:03:11 +0200
commit3687fcb0752ac9c4630b4aeb5362c6e6f81c528e (patch)
treee6b2116374c6bd3f4ac7ed096daf179ef297a374 /fs/btrfs/block-group.c
parentbtrfs: change the bg_reclaim_threshold valid region from 0 to 100 (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-3687fcb0752ac9c4630b4aeb5362c6e6f81c528e.tar.xz
linux-dev-3687fcb0752ac9c4630b4aeb5362c6e6f81c528e.zip
btrfs: zoned: make auto-reclaim less aggressive
The current auto-reclaim algorithm starts reclaiming all block groups with a zone_unusable value above a configured threshold. This is causing a lot of reclaim IO even if there would be enough free zones on the device. Instead of only accounting a block groups zone_unusable value, also take the ratio of free and not usable (written as well as zone_unusable) bytes a device has into account. Tested-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/block-group.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/block-group.c10
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index fb3ce80fd7e4..7bf10afab89c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1512,6 +1512,13 @@ static int reclaim_bgs_cmp(void *unused, const struct list_head *a,
return bg1->used > bg2->used;
}
+static inline bool btrfs_should_reclaim(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+ if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info))
+ return btrfs_zoned_should_reclaim(fs_info);
+ return true;
+}
+
void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info =
@@ -1522,6 +1529,9 @@ void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
return;
+ if (!btrfs_should_reclaim(fs_info))
+ return;
+
sb_start_write(fs_info->sb);
if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE)) {