aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>2021-05-08 00:07:51 +0200
committerArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>2021-05-10 17:50:47 +0200
commit0652035a57945e14e611dafae2ec5b46a05bc1d1 (patch)
tree0c34544a7755bc1ee0a822e86458d3ed9215533f /include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h
parentpowerpc: use linux/unaligned/le_struct.h on LE power7 (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-0652035a57945e14e611dafae2ec5b46a05bc1d1.tar.xz
linux-dev-0652035a57945e14e611dafae2ec5b46a05bc1d1.zip
asm-generic: unaligned: remove byteshift helpers
In theory, compilers should be able to work this out themselves so we can use a simpler version based on the swab() helpers. I have verified that this works on all supported compiler versions (gcc-4.9 and up, clang-10 and up). Looking at the object code produced by gcc-11, I found that the impact is mostly a change in inlining decisions that lead to slightly larger code. In other cases, this version produces explicit byte swaps in place of separate byte access, or comparing against pre-swapped constants. While the source code is clearly simpler, I have not seen an indication of the new version actually producing better code on Arm, so maybe we want to skip this after all. From what I can tell, gcc recognizes the byteswap pattern in the byteshift.h header and can turn it into explicit instructions, but it does not turn a __builtin_bswap32() back into individual bytes when that would result in better output, e.g. when storing a byte-reversed constant. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h30
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h b/include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h
index 9977987883a6..22f90a4afaa5 100644
--- a/include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h
+++ b/include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h
@@ -34,4 +34,34 @@ static inline void put_unaligned_le64(u64 val, void *p)
__put_unaligned_cpu64(val, p);
}
+static inline u16 get_unaligned_be16(const void *p)
+{
+ return swab16(__get_unaligned_cpu16((const u8 *)p));
+}
+
+static inline u32 get_unaligned_be32(const void *p)
+{
+ return swab32(__get_unaligned_cpu32((const u8 *)p));
+}
+
+static inline u64 get_unaligned_be64(const void *p)
+{
+ return swab64(__get_unaligned_cpu64((const u8 *)p));
+}
+
+static inline void put_unaligned_be16(u16 val, void *p)
+{
+ __put_unaligned_cpu16(swab16(val), p);
+}
+
+static inline void put_unaligned_be32(u32 val, void *p)
+{
+ __put_unaligned_cpu32(swab32(val), p);
+}
+
+static inline void put_unaligned_be64(u64 val, void *p)
+{
+ __put_unaligned_cpu64(swab64(val), p);
+}
+
#endif /* _LINUX_UNALIGNED_LE_STRUCT_H */