hrtimer: Improve comments on handling priority inversion against softirq kthread

The handling of a priority inversion between timer cancelling and a a not
well defined possible preemption of softirq kthread is not very clear.

Especially in the posix timers side it's unclear why there is a specific RT
wait callback.

All the nice explanations can be found in the initial changelog of
f61eff83cec9 (hrtimer: Prepare support for PREEMPT_RT").

Extract the detailed informations from there and put it into comments.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190820132656.GC2093@lenoir

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 499122752649..833353732554 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -1201,10 +1201,16 @@ static void hrtimer_sync_wait_running(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
  * deletion of a timer failed because the timer callback function was
  * running.
  *
- * This prevents priority inversion, if the softirq thread on a remote CPU
- * got preempted, and it prevents a life lock when the task which tries to
- * delete a timer preempted the softirq thread running the timer callback
- * function.
+ * This prevents priority inversion: if the soft irq thread is preempted
+ * in the middle of a timer callback, then calling del_timer_sync() can
+ * lead to two issues:
+ *
+ *  - If the caller is on a remote CPU then it has to spin wait for the timer
+ *    handler to complete. This can result in unbound priority inversion.
+ *
+ *  - If the caller originates from the task which preempted the timer
+ *    handler on the same CPU, then spin waiting for the timer handler to
+ *    complete is never going to end.
  */
 void hrtimer_cancel_wait_running(const struct hrtimer *timer)
 {