netpoll: Remove gfp parameter from __netpoll_setup

The gfp parameter was added in:
commit 47be03a28cc6c80e3aa2b3e8ed6d960ff0c5c0af
Author: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 10 01:24:37 2012 +0000

    netpoll: use GFP_ATOMIC in slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup()

    slave_enable_netpoll() and __netpoll_setup() may be called
    with read_lock() held, so should use GFP_ATOMIC to allocate
    memory. Eric suggested to pass gfp flags to __netpoll_setup().

    Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
    Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
    Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
    Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The reason for the gfp parameter was removed in:
commit c4cdef9b7183159c23c7302aaf270d64c549f557
Author: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue Jul 23 15:25:27 2013 +0800

    bonding: don't call slave_xxx_netpoll under spinlocks

    The slave_xxx_netpoll will call synchronize_rcu_bh(),
    so the function may schedule and sleep, it should't be
    called under spinlocks.

    bond_netpoll_setup() and bond_netpoll_cleanup() are always
    protected by rtnl lock, it is no need to take the read lock,
    as the slave list couldn't be changed outside rtnl lock.

    Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
    Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
    Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Nothing else that calls __netpoll_setup or ndo_netpoll_setup
requires a gfp paramter, so remove the gfp parameter from both
of these functions making the code clearer.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 41c4e9ce1141..2c6379da295c 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ int netpoll_parse_options(struct netpoll *np, char *opt)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_parse_options);
 
-int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev, gfp_t gfp)
+int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev)
 {
 	struct netpoll_info *npinfo;
 	const struct net_device_ops *ops;
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev, gfp_t gfp)
 	}
 
 	if (!ndev->npinfo) {
-		npinfo = kmalloc(sizeof(*npinfo), gfp);
+		npinfo = kmalloc(sizeof(*npinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!npinfo) {
 			err = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev, gfp_t gfp)
 
 		ops = np->dev->netdev_ops;
 		if (ops->ndo_netpoll_setup) {
-			err = ops->ndo_netpoll_setup(ndev, npinfo, gfp);
+			err = ops->ndo_netpoll_setup(ndev, npinfo);
 			if (err)
 				goto free_npinfo;
 		}
@@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ int netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np)
 	/* fill up the skb queue */
 	refill_skbs();
 
-	err = __netpoll_setup(np, ndev, GFP_KERNEL);
+	err = __netpoll_setup(np, ndev);
 	if (err)
 		goto put;