aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/dsa/switch.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>2019-02-20 14:35:39 -0800
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2019-02-22 11:53:32 -0800
commit061f6a505ac33659eab007731c0f6374df39ab55 (patch)
treeeaa11fe77005b43a576b173c4bf9a54ae2135f35 /net/dsa/switch.c
parentnet: dsa: Deny enslaving VLAN devices into VLAN aware bridge (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-061f6a505ac33659eab007731c0f6374df39ab55.tar.xz
linux-dev-061f6a505ac33659eab007731c0f6374df39ab55.zip
net: dsa: Add ndo_vlan_rx_{add, kill}_vid implementation
In order to properly support VLAN filtering being enabled/disabled on a bridge, while having other ports being non bridge port members, we need to support the ndo_vlan_rx_{add,kill}_vid callbacks in order to make sure the non-bridge ports can continue receiving VLAN tags, even when the switch is globally configured to do ingress/egress VID checking. Since we can call dsa_port_vlan_{add,del} with a bridge_dev pointer NULL, we now need to check that in these two functions. We specifically deal with two possibly problematic cases: - creating a bridge VLAN entry while there is an existing VLAN device claiming that same VID - creating a VLAN device while there is an existing bridge VLAN entry with that VID Those are both resolved with returning -EBUSY back to user-space. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--net/dsa/switch.c42
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c
index 142b294d3446..e1fae969aa73 100644
--- a/net/dsa/switch.c
+++ b/net/dsa/switch.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
#include <net/switchdev.h>
#include "dsa_priv.h"
@@ -168,6 +169,43 @@ static int dsa_switch_mdb_del(struct dsa_switch *ds,
return 0;
}
+static int dsa_port_vlan_device_check(struct net_device *vlan_dev,
+ int vlan_dev_vid,
+ void *arg)
+{
+ struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan = arg;
+ u16 vid;
+
+ for (vid = vlan->vid_begin; vid <= vlan->vid_end; ++vid) {
+ if (vid == vlan_dev_vid)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dsa_port_vlan_check(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+ const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan)
+{
+ const struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
+ int err = 0;
+
+ /* Device is not bridged, let it proceed with the VLAN device
+ * creation.
+ */
+ if (!dp->bridge_dev)
+ return err;
+
+ /* dsa_slave_vlan_rx_{add,kill}_vid() cannot use the prepare pharse and
+ * already checks whether there is an overlapping bridge VLAN entry
+ * with the same VID, so here we only need to check that if we are
+ * adding a bridge VLAN entry there is not an overlapping VLAN device
+ * claiming that VID.
+ */
+ return vlan_for_each(dp->slave, dsa_port_vlan_device_check,
+ (void *)vlan);
+}
+
static int
dsa_switch_vlan_prepare_bitmap(struct dsa_switch *ds,
const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan,
@@ -179,6 +217,10 @@ dsa_switch_vlan_prepare_bitmap(struct dsa_switch *ds,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
for_each_set_bit(port, bitmap, ds->num_ports) {
+ err = dsa_port_vlan_check(ds, port, vlan);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
err = ds->ops->port_vlan_prepare(ds, port, vlan);
if (err)
return err;