aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>2015-03-11 18:53:14 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2015-03-11 21:55:28 -0400
commit33cf7c90fe2f97afb1cadaa0cfb782cb9d1b9ee2 (patch)
tree7a0c80d0b2bb618919d966ce5b827c7eb8f843f6 /net/ipv4/syncookies.c
parentfib_trie: Only display main table in /proc/net/route (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-33cf7c90fe2f97afb1cadaa0cfb782cb9d1b9ee2.tar.xz
linux-dev-33cf7c90fe2f97afb1cadaa0cfb782cb9d1b9ee2.zip
net: add real socket cookies
A long standing problem in netlink socket dumps is the use of kernel socket addresses as cookies. 1) It is a security concern. 2) Sockets can be reused quite quickly, so there is no guarantee a cookie is used once and identify a flow. 3) request sock, establish sock, and timewait socks for a given flow have different cookies. Part of our effort to bring better TCP statistics requires to switch to a different allocator. In this patch, I chose to use a per network namespace 64bit generator, and to use it only in the case a socket needs to be dumped to netlink. (This might be refined later if needed) Note that I tried to carry cookies from request sock, to establish sock, then timewait sockets. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Eric Salo <salo@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/syncookies.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/syncookies.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
index 45fe60c5238e..ece31b426013 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
req->ts_recent = tcp_opt.saw_tstamp ? tcp_opt.rcv_tsval : 0;
treq->snt_synack = tcp_opt.saw_tstamp ? tcp_opt.rcv_tsecr : 0;
treq->listener = NULL;
+ ireq->ireq_net = sock_net(sk);
/* We throwed the options of the initial SYN away, so we hope
* the ACK carries the same options again (see RFC1122 4.2.3.8)