diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 70 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/scale.c | 18 |
2 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index e2ebcaddbe78..6cb6a1074fd1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -208,6 +208,76 @@ static void bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw(struct bpf_test *self) self->retval = (uint32_t)res; } +/* test the sequence of 1k jumps */ +static void bpf_fill_scale1(struct bpf_test *self) +{ + struct bpf_insn *insn = self->fill_insns; + int i = 0, k = 0; + + insn[i++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1); + /* test to check that the sequence of 1024 jumps is acceptable */ + while (k++ < 1024) { + insn[i++] = BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32); + insn[i++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, bpf_semi_rand_get(), 2); + insn[i++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10); + insn[i++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, + -8 * (k % 64 + 1)); + } + /* every jump adds 1024 steps to insn_processed, so to stay exactly + * within 1m limit add MAX_TEST_INSNS - 1025 MOVs and 1 EXIT + */ + while (i < MAX_TEST_INSNS - 1025) + insn[i++] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 42); + insn[i] = BPF_EXIT_INSN(); + self->prog_len = i + 1; + self->retval = 42; +} + +/* test the sequence of 1k jumps in inner most function (function depth 8)*/ +static void bpf_fill_scale2(struct bpf_test *self) +{ + struct bpf_insn *insn = self->fill_insns; + int i = 0, k = 0; + +#define FUNC_NEST 7 + for (k = 0; k < FUNC_NEST; k++) { + insn[i++] = BPF_CALL_REL(1); + insn[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN(); + } + insn[i++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1); + /* test to check that the sequence of 1024 jumps is acceptable */ + while (k++ < 1024) { + insn[i++] = BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32); + insn[i++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, bpf_semi_rand_get(), 2); + insn[i++] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10); + insn[i++] = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, + -8 * (k % (64 - 4 * FUNC_NEST) + 1)); + } + /* every jump adds 1024 steps to insn_processed, so to stay exactly + * within 1m limit add MAX_TEST_INSNS - 1025 MOVs and 1 EXIT + */ + while (i < MAX_TEST_INSNS - 1025) + insn[i++] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 42); + insn[i] = BPF_EXIT_INSN(); + self->prog_len = i + 1; + self->retval = 42; +} + +static void bpf_fill_scale(struct bpf_test *self) +{ + switch (self->retval) { + case 1: + return bpf_fill_scale1(self); + case 2: + return bpf_fill_scale2(self); + default: + self->prog_len = 0; + break; + } +} + /* BPF_SK_LOOKUP contains 13 instructions, if you need to fix up maps */ #define BPF_SK_LOOKUP(func) \ /* struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {} */ \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/scale.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/scale.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7f868d4802e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/scale.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +{ + "scale: scale test 1", + .insns = { }, + .data = { }, + .fill_helper = bpf_fill_scale, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, +}, +{ + "scale: scale test 2", + .insns = { }, + .data = { }, + .fill_helper = bpf_fill_scale, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 2, +}, |