aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/RCU/Design
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/RCU/Design')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/ExpSchedFlow.svg18
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html26
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html6
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-callback-invocation.svg2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-gp.svg8
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-qs.svg6
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html20
7 files changed, 48 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/ExpSchedFlow.svg b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/ExpSchedFlow.svg
index e4233ac93c2b..6189ffcc6aff 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/ExpSchedFlow.svg
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/ExpSchedFlow.svg
@@ -328,13 +328,13 @@
inkscape:window-height="1148"
id="namedview90"
showgrid="true"
- inkscape:zoom="0.80021373"
- inkscape:cx="462.49289"
- inkscape:cy="473.6718"
+ inkscape:zoom="0.69092787"
+ inkscape:cx="476.34085"
+ inkscape:cy="712.80957"
inkscape:window-x="770"
inkscape:window-y="24"
inkscape:window-maximized="0"
- inkscape:current-layer="g4114-9-3-9"
+ inkscape:current-layer="g4"
inkscape:snap-grids="false"
fit-margin-top="5"
fit-margin-right="5"
@@ -813,14 +813,18 @@
<text
sodipodi:linespacing="125%"
id="text4110-5-7-6-2-4-0"
- y="841.88086"
+ y="670.74316"
x="1460.1007"
style="font-size:267.24359131px;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;text-align:center;line-height:125%;letter-spacing:0px;word-spacing:0px;text-anchor:middle;fill:#000000;fill-opacity:1;stroke:none;font-family:Sans"
xml:space="preserve"><tspan
- y="841.88086"
+ y="670.74316"
+ x="1460.1007"
+ sodipodi:role="line"
+ id="tspan4925-1-2-4-5">Request</tspan><tspan
+ y="1004.7976"
x="1460.1007"
sodipodi:role="line"
- id="tspan4925-1-2-4-5">reched_cpu()</tspan></text>
+ id="tspan3100">context switch</tspan></text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
index 8e4f873b979f..19e7a5fb6b73 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html
@@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ will ignore it because idle and offline CPUs are already residing
in quiescent states.
Otherwise, the expedited grace period will use
<tt>smp_call_function_single()</tt> to send the CPU an IPI, which
-is handled by <tt>sync_rcu_exp_handler()</tt>.
+is handled by <tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt>.
<p>
-However, because this is preemptible RCU, <tt>sync_rcu_exp_handler()</tt>
+However, because this is preemptible RCU, <tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt>
can check to see if the CPU is currently running in an RCU read-side
critical section.
If not, the handler can immediately report a quiescent state.
@@ -145,19 +145,18 @@ expedited grace period is shown in the following diagram:
<p><img src="ExpSchedFlow.svg" alt="ExpSchedFlow.svg" width="55%">
<p>
-As with RCU-preempt's <tt>synchronize_rcu_expedited()</tt>,
+As with RCU-preempt, RCU-sched's
<tt>synchronize_sched_expedited()</tt> ignores offline and
idle CPUs, again because they are in remotely detectable
quiescent states.
-However, the <tt>synchronize_rcu_expedited()</tt> handler
-is <tt>sync_sched_exp_handler()</tt>, and because the
+However, because the
<tt>rcu_read_lock_sched()</tt> and <tt>rcu_read_unlock_sched()</tt>
leave no trace of their invocation, in general it is not possible to tell
whether or not the current CPU is in an RCU read-side critical section.
-The best that <tt>sync_sched_exp_handler()</tt> can do is to check
+The best that RCU-sched's <tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt> can do is to check
for idle, on the off-chance that the CPU went idle while the IPI
was in flight.
-If the CPU is idle, then <tt>sync_sched_exp_handler()</tt> reports
+If the CPU is idle, then <tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt> reports
the quiescent state.
<p> Otherwise, the handler forces a future context switch by setting the
@@ -298,19 +297,18 @@ Instead, the task pushing the grace period forward will include the
idle CPUs in the mask passed to <tt>rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult()</tt>.
<p>
-For RCU-sched, there is an additional check for idle in the IPI
-handler, <tt>sync_sched_exp_handler()</tt>.
+For RCU-sched, there is an additional check:
If the IPI has interrupted the idle loop, then
-<tt>sync_sched_exp_handler()</tt> invokes <tt>rcu_report_exp_rdp()</tt>
+<tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt> invokes <tt>rcu_report_exp_rdp()</tt>
to report the corresponding quiescent state.
<p>
For RCU-preempt, there is no specific check for idle in the
-IPI handler (<tt>sync_rcu_exp_handler()</tt>), but because
+IPI handler (<tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt>), but because
RCU read-side critical sections are not permitted within the
-idle loop, if <tt>sync_rcu_exp_handler()</tt> sees that the CPU is within
+idle loop, if <tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt> sees that the CPU is within
RCU read-side critical section, the CPU cannot possibly be idle.
-Otherwise, <tt>sync_rcu_exp_handler()</tt> invokes
+Otherwise, <tt>rcu_exp_handler()</tt> invokes
<tt>rcu_report_exp_rdp()</tt> to report the corresponding quiescent
state, regardless of whether or not that quiescent state was due to
the CPU being idle.
@@ -625,6 +623,8 @@ checks, but only during the mid-boot dead zone.
<p>
With this refinement, synchronous grace periods can now be used from
task context pretty much any time during the life of the kernel.
+That is, aside from some points in the suspend, hibernate, or shutdown
+code path.
<h3><a name="Summary">
Summary</a></h3>
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html
index e4d94fba6c89..8d21af02b1f0 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html
@@ -485,13 +485,13 @@ section that the grace period must wait on.
noted by <tt>rcu_node_context_switch()</tt> on the left.
On the other hand, if the CPU takes a scheduler-clock interrupt
while executing in usermode, a quiescent state will be noted by
-<tt>rcu_check_callbacks()</tt> on the right.
+<tt>rcu_sched_clock_irq()</tt> on the right.
Either way, the passage through a quiescent state will be noted
in a per-CPU variable.
<p>The next time an <tt>RCU_SOFTIRQ</tt> handler executes on
this CPU (for example, after the next scheduler-clock
-interrupt), <tt>__rcu_process_callbacks()</tt> will invoke
+interrupt), <tt>rcu_core()</tt> will invoke
<tt>rcu_check_quiescent_state()</tt>, which will notice the
recorded quiescent state, and invoke
<tt>rcu_report_qs_rdp()</tt>.
@@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ to end.
These callbacks are identified by <tt>rcu_advance_cbs()</tt>,
which is usually invoked by <tt>__note_gp_changes()</tt>.
As shown in the diagram below, this invocation can be triggered by
-the scheduling-clock interrupt (<tt>rcu_check_callbacks()</tt> on
+the scheduling-clock interrupt (<tt>rcu_sched_clock_irq()</tt> on
the left) or by idle entry (<tt>rcu_cleanup_after_idle()</tt> on
the right, but only for kernels build with
<tt>CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y</tt>).
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-callback-invocation.svg b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-callback-invocation.svg
index 832408313d93..3fcf0c17cef2 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-callback-invocation.svg
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-callback-invocation.svg
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
font-weight="bold"
font-size="192"
id="text202-7-5"
- style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier">rcu_check_callbacks()</text>
+ style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier">rcu_sched_clock_irq()</text>
<rect
x="7069.6187"
y="5087.4678"
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-gp.svg b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-gp.svg
index acd73c7ad0f4..2bcd742d6e49 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-gp.svg
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-gp.svg
@@ -3902,7 +3902,7 @@
font-style="normal"
y="-4418.6582"
x="3745.7725"
- xml:space="preserve">rcu_check_callbacks()</text>
+ xml:space="preserve">rcu_sched_clock_irq()</text>
</g>
<g
transform="translate(-850.30204,55463.106)"
@@ -3924,7 +3924,7 @@
font-style="normal"
y="-4418.6582"
x="3745.7725"
- xml:space="preserve">rcu_process_callbacks()</text>
+ xml:space="preserve">rcu_core()</text>
<text
style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier"
id="text202-7-5-3-27-0"
@@ -3933,7 +3933,7 @@
font-style="normal"
y="-4165.7954"
x="3745.7725"
- xml:space="preserve">rcu_check_quiescent_state())</text>
+ xml:space="preserve">rcu_check_quiescent_state()</text>
<text
style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier"
id="text202-7-5-3-27-0-9"
@@ -4968,7 +4968,7 @@
font-weight="bold"
font-size="192"
id="text202-7-5-19"
- style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier">rcu_check_callbacks()</text>
+ style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier">rcu_sched_clock_irq()</text>
<rect
x="5314.2671"
y="82817.688"
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-qs.svg b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-qs.svg
index 149bec2a4493..779c9ac31a52 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-qs.svg
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/TreeRCU-qs.svg
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@
font-style="normal"
y="-4418.6582"
x="3745.7725"
- xml:space="preserve">rcu_check_callbacks()</text>
+ xml:space="preserve">rcu_sched_clock_irq()</text>
</g>
<g
transform="translate(399.7744,828.86448)"
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@
font-style="normal"
y="-4418.6582"
x="3745.7725"
- xml:space="preserve">rcu_process_callbacks()</text>
+ xml:space="preserve">rcu_core()</text>
<text
style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier"
id="text202-7-5-3-27-0"
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
font-style="normal"
y="-4165.7954"
x="3745.7725"
- xml:space="preserve">rcu_check_quiescent_state())</text>
+ xml:space="preserve">rcu_check_quiescent_state()</text>
<text
style="font-size:192px;font-style:normal;font-weight:bold;text-anchor:start;fill:#000000;stroke-width:0.025in;font-family:Courier"
id="text202-7-5-3-27-0-9"
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
index 9fca73e03a98..5a9238a2883c 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
@@ -3099,7 +3099,7 @@ If you block forever in one of a given domain's SRCU read-side critical
sections, then that domain's grace periods will also be blocked forever.
Of course, one good way to block forever is to deadlock, which can
happen if any operation in a given domain's SRCU read-side critical
-section can block waiting, either directly or indirectly, for that domain's
+section can wait, either directly or indirectly, for that domain's
grace period to elapse.
For example, this results in a self-deadlock:
@@ -3139,12 +3139,18 @@ API, which, in combination with <tt>srcu_read_unlock()</tt>,
guarantees a full memory barrier.
<p>
-Also unlike other RCU flavors, SRCU's callbacks-wait function
-<tt>srcu_barrier()</tt> may be invoked from CPU-hotplug notifiers,
-though this is not necessarily a good idea.
-The reason that this is possible is that SRCU is insensitive
-to whether or not a CPU is online, which means that <tt>srcu_barrier()</tt>
-need not exclude CPU-hotplug operations.
+Also unlike other RCU flavors, <tt>synchronize_srcu()</tt> may <b>not</b>
+be invoked from CPU-hotplug notifiers, due to the fact that SRCU grace
+periods make use of timers and the possibility of timers being temporarily
+&ldquo;stranded&rdquo; on the outgoing CPU.
+This stranding of timers means that timers posted to the outgoing CPU
+will not fire until late in the CPU-hotplug process.
+The problem is that if a notifier is waiting on an SRCU grace period,
+that grace period is waiting on a timer, and that timer is stranded on the
+outgoing CPU, then the notifier will never be awakened, in other words,
+deadlock has occurred.
+This same situation of course also prohibits <tt>srcu_barrier()</tt>
+from being invoked from CPU-hotplug notifiers.
<p>
SRCU also differs from other RCU flavors in that SRCU's expedited and