aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c996
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 903 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
index ae854bc25dbe..1b203d18c6e9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
@@ -46,11 +46,6 @@
* @{
*/
-static struct cl_lock_closure *lov_closure_get(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct cl_lock *parent);
-
-static int lov_lock_unuse(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_lock_slice *slice);
/*****************************************************************************
*
* Lov lock operations.
@@ -58,7 +53,7 @@ static int lov_lock_unuse(const struct lu_env *env,
*/
static struct lov_sublock_env *lov_sublock_env_get(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct cl_lock *parent,
+ const struct cl_lock *parent,
struct lov_lock_sub *lls)
{
struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
@@ -100,185 +95,26 @@ static void lov_sublock_env_put(struct lov_sublock_env *subenv)
lov_sub_put(subenv->lse_sub);
}
-static void lov_sublock_adopt(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
- struct cl_lock *sublock, int idx,
- struct lov_lock_link *link)
+static int lov_sublock_init(const struct lu_env *env,
+ const struct cl_lock *parent,
+ struct lov_lock_sub *lls)
{
- struct lovsub_lock *lsl;
- struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
- int rc;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sublock));
-
- lsl = cl2sub_lock(sublock);
- /*
- * check that sub-lock doesn't have lock link to this top-lock.
- */
- LASSERT(!lov_lock_link_find(env, lck, lsl));
- LASSERT(idx < lck->lls_nr);
-
- lck->lls_sub[idx].sub_lock = lsl;
- lck->lls_nr_filled++;
- LASSERT(lck->lls_nr_filled <= lck->lls_nr);
- list_add_tail(&link->lll_list, &lsl->lss_parents);
- link->lll_idx = idx;
- link->lll_super = lck;
- cl_lock_get(parent);
- lu_ref_add(&parent->cll_reference, "lov-child", sublock);
- lck->lls_sub[idx].sub_flags |= LSF_HELD;
- cl_lock_user_add(env, sublock);
-
- rc = lov_sublock_modify(env, lck, lsl, &sublock->cll_descr, idx);
- LASSERT(rc == 0); /* there is no way this can fail, currently */
-}
-
-static struct cl_lock *lov_sublock_alloc(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_io *io,
- struct lov_lock *lck,
- int idx, struct lov_lock_link **out)
-{
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- struct cl_lock *parent;
- struct lov_lock_link *link;
-
- LASSERT(idx < lck->lls_nr);
-
- link = kmem_cache_zalloc(lov_lock_link_kmem, GFP_NOFS);
- if (link) {
- struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
- struct cl_lock_descr *descr;
-
- parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
- lls = &lck->lls_sub[idx];
- descr = &lls->sub_got;
-
- subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, parent, lls);
- if (!IS_ERR(subenv)) {
- /* CAVEAT: Don't try to add a field in lov_lock_sub
- * to remember the subio. This is because lock is able
- * to be cached, but this is not true for IO. This
- * further means a sublock might be referenced in
- * different io context. -jay
- */
-
- sublock = cl_lock_hold(subenv->lse_env, subenv->lse_io,
- descr, "lov-parent", parent);
- lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
- } else {
- /* error occurs. */
- sublock = (void *)subenv;
- }
-
- if (!IS_ERR(sublock))
- *out = link;
- else
- kmem_cache_free(lov_lock_link_kmem, link);
- } else
- sublock = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- return sublock;
-}
-
-static void lov_sublock_unlock(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lovsub_lock *lsl,
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure,
- struct lov_sublock_env *subenv)
-{
- lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
- lsl->lss_active = NULL;
- cl_lock_disclosure(env, closure);
-}
-
-static int lov_sublock_lock(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lov_lock *lck,
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls,
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure,
- struct lov_sublock_env **lsep)
-{
- struct lovsub_lock *sublock;
- struct cl_lock *child;
- int result = 0;
-
- LASSERT(list_empty(&closure->clc_list));
-
- sublock = lls->sub_lock;
- child = sublock->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- result = cl_lock_closure_build(env, child, closure);
- if (result == 0) {
- struct cl_lock *parent = closure->clc_origin;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(child));
- sublock->lss_active = parent;
-
- if (unlikely((child->cll_state == CLS_FREEING) ||
- (child->cll_flags & CLF_CANCELLED))) {
- struct lov_lock_link *link;
- /*
- * we could race with lock deletion which temporarily
- * put the lock in freeing state, bug 19080.
- */
- LASSERT(!(lls->sub_flags & LSF_HELD));
-
- link = lov_lock_link_find(env, lck, sublock);
- LASSERT(link);
- lov_lock_unlink(env, link, sublock);
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sublock, closure, NULL);
- lck->lls_cancel_race = 1;
- result = CLO_REPEAT;
- } else if (lsep) {
- struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
+ struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
+ int result;
- subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, parent, lls);
- if (IS_ERR(subenv)) {
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sublock,
- closure, NULL);
- result = PTR_ERR(subenv);
- } else {
- *lsep = subenv;
- }
- }
+ subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, parent, lls);
+ if (!IS_ERR(subenv)) {
+ result = cl_lock_init(subenv->lse_env, &lls->sub_lock,
+ subenv->lse_io);
+ lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
+ } else {
+ /* error occurs. */
+ result = PTR_ERR(subenv);
}
return result;
}
/**
- * Updates the result of a top-lock operation from a result of sub-lock
- * sub-operations. Top-operations like lov_lock_{enqueue,use,unuse}() iterate
- * over sub-locks and lov_subresult() is used to calculate return value of a
- * top-operation. To this end, possible return values of sub-operations are
- * ordered as
- *
- * - 0 success
- * - CLO_WAIT wait for event
- * - CLO_REPEAT repeat top-operation
- * - -ne fundamental error
- *
- * Top-level return code can only go down through this list. CLO_REPEAT
- * overwrites CLO_WAIT, because lock mutex was released and sleeping condition
- * has to be rechecked by the upper layer.
- */
-static int lov_subresult(int result, int rc)
-{
- int result_rank;
- int rc_rank;
-
- LASSERTF(result <= 0 || result == CLO_REPEAT || result == CLO_WAIT,
- "result = %d\n", result);
- LASSERTF(rc <= 0 || rc == CLO_REPEAT || rc == CLO_WAIT,
- "rc = %d\n", rc);
- CLASSERT(CLO_WAIT < CLO_REPEAT);
-
- /* calculate ranks in the ordering above */
- result_rank = result < 0 ? 1 + CLO_REPEAT : result;
- rc_rank = rc < 0 ? 1 + CLO_REPEAT : rc;
-
- if (result_rank < rc_rank)
- result = rc;
- return result;
-}
-
-/**
* Creates sub-locks for a given lov_lock for the first time.
*
* Goes through all sub-objects of top-object, and creates sub-locks on every
@@ -286,8 +122,9 @@ static int lov_subresult(int result, int rc)
* fact that top-lock (that is being created) can be accessed concurrently
* through already created sub-locks (possibly shared with other top-locks).
*/
-static int lov_lock_sub_init(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lov_lock *lck, const struct cl_io *io)
+static struct lov_lock *lov_lock_sub_init(const struct lu_env *env,
+ const struct cl_object *obj,
+ struct cl_lock *lock)
{
int result = 0;
int i;
@@ -297,241 +134,86 @@ static int lov_lock_sub_init(const struct lu_env *env,
u64 file_start;
u64 file_end;
- struct lov_object *loo = cl2lov(lck->lls_cl.cls_obj);
+ struct lov_object *loo = cl2lov(obj);
struct lov_layout_raid0 *r0 = lov_r0(loo);
- struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
+ struct lov_lock *lovlck;
- lck->lls_orig = parent->cll_descr;
- file_start = cl_offset(lov2cl(loo), parent->cll_descr.cld_start);
- file_end = cl_offset(lov2cl(loo), parent->cll_descr.cld_end + 1) - 1;
+ file_start = cl_offset(lov2cl(loo), lock->cll_descr.cld_start);
+ file_end = cl_offset(lov2cl(loo), lock->cll_descr.cld_end + 1) - 1;
for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < r0->lo_nr; i++) {
/*
* XXX for wide striping smarter algorithm is desirable,
* breaking out of the loop, early.
*/
- if (likely(r0->lo_sub[i]) &&
+ if (likely(r0->lo_sub[i]) && /* spare layout */
lov_stripe_intersects(loo->lo_lsm, i,
file_start, file_end, &start, &end))
nr++;
}
LASSERT(nr > 0);
- lck->lls_sub = libcfs_kvzalloc(nr * sizeof(lck->lls_sub[0]), GFP_NOFS);
- if (!lck->lls_sub)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ lovlck = libcfs_kvzalloc(offsetof(struct lov_lock, lls_sub[nr]),
+ GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!lovlck)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- lck->lls_nr = nr;
- /*
- * First, fill in sub-lock descriptions in
- * lck->lls_sub[].sub_descr. They are used by lov_sublock_alloc()
- * (called below in this function, and by lov_lock_enqueue()) to
- * create sub-locks. At this moment, no other thread can access
- * top-lock.
- */
+ lovlck->lls_nr = nr;
for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < r0->lo_nr; ++i) {
if (likely(r0->lo_sub[i]) &&
lov_stripe_intersects(loo->lo_lsm, i,
file_start, file_end, &start, &end)) {
+ struct lov_lock_sub *lls = &lovlck->lls_sub[nr];
struct cl_lock_descr *descr;
- descr = &lck->lls_sub[nr].sub_descr;
+ descr = &lls->sub_lock.cll_descr;
LASSERT(!descr->cld_obj);
descr->cld_obj = lovsub2cl(r0->lo_sub[i]);
descr->cld_start = cl_index(descr->cld_obj, start);
descr->cld_end = cl_index(descr->cld_obj, end);
- descr->cld_mode = parent->cll_descr.cld_mode;
- descr->cld_gid = parent->cll_descr.cld_gid;
- descr->cld_enq_flags = parent->cll_descr.cld_enq_flags;
- /* XXX has no effect */
- lck->lls_sub[nr].sub_got = *descr;
- lck->lls_sub[nr].sub_stripe = i;
+ descr->cld_mode = lock->cll_descr.cld_mode;
+ descr->cld_gid = lock->cll_descr.cld_gid;
+ descr->cld_enq_flags = lock->cll_descr.cld_enq_flags;
+ lls->sub_stripe = i;
+
+ /* initialize sub lock */
+ result = lov_sublock_init(env, lock, lls);
+ if (result < 0)
+ break;
+
+ lls->sub_initialized = 1;
nr++;
}
}
- LASSERT(nr == lck->lls_nr);
-
- /*
- * Some sub-locks can be missing at this point. This is not a problem,
- * because enqueue will create them anyway. Main duty of this function
- * is to fill in sub-lock descriptions in a race free manner.
- */
- return result;
-}
+ LASSERT(ergo(result == 0, nr == lovlck->lls_nr));
-static int lov_sublock_release(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
- int i, int deluser, int rc)
-{
- struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
-
- if (lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags & LSF_HELD) {
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- int dying;
-
- sublock = lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sublock));
+ if (result != 0) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nr; ++i) {
+ if (!lovlck->lls_sub[i].sub_initialized)
+ break;
- lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags &= ~LSF_HELD;
- if (deluser)
- cl_lock_user_del(env, sublock);
- /*
- * If the last hold is released, and cancellation is pending
- * for a sub-lock, release parent mutex, to avoid keeping it
- * while sub-lock is being paged out.
- */
- dying = (sublock->cll_descr.cld_mode == CLM_PHANTOM ||
- sublock->cll_descr.cld_mode == CLM_GROUP ||
- (sublock->cll_flags & (CLF_CANCELPEND|CLF_DOOMED))) &&
- sublock->cll_holds == 1;
- if (dying)
- cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
- cl_lock_unhold(env, sublock, "lov-parent", parent);
- if (dying) {
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
- rc = lov_subresult(rc, CLO_REPEAT);
+ cl_lock_fini(env, &lovlck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock);
}
- /*
- * From now on lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock is a "weak" pointer,
- * not backed by a reference on a
- * sub-lock. lovsub_lock_delete() will clear
- * lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock under semaphores, just before
- * sub-lock is destroyed.
- */
+ kvfree(lovlck);
+ lovlck = ERR_PTR(result);
}
- return rc;
-}
-
-static void lov_sublock_hold(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
- int i)
-{
- struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
-
- if (!(lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags & LSF_HELD)) {
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
-
- sublock = lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sublock));
- LASSERT(sublock->cll_state != CLS_FREEING);
- lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags |= LSF_HELD;
-
- cl_lock_get_trust(sublock);
- cl_lock_hold_add(env, sublock, "lov-parent", parent);
- cl_lock_user_add(env, sublock);
- cl_lock_put(env, sublock);
- }
+ return lovlck;
}
static void lov_lock_fini(const struct lu_env *env,
struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
{
- struct lov_lock *lck;
+ struct lov_lock *lovlck;
int i;
- lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- LASSERT(lck->lls_nr_filled == 0);
- if (lck->lls_sub) {
- for (i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i)
- /*
- * No sub-locks exists at this point, as sub-lock has
- * a reference on its parent.
- */
- LASSERT(!lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock);
- kvfree(lck->lls_sub);
+ lovlck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
+ for (i = 0; i < lovlck->lls_nr; ++i) {
+ LASSERT(!lovlck->lls_sub[i].sub_is_enqueued);
+ if (lovlck->lls_sub[i].sub_initialized)
+ cl_lock_fini(env, &lovlck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock);
}
- kmem_cache_free(lov_lock_kmem, lck);
-}
-
-static int lov_lock_enqueue_wait(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lov_lock *lck,
- struct cl_lock *sublock)
-{
- struct cl_lock *lock = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
- int result;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(lock));
-
- cl_lock_mutex_put(env, lock);
- result = cl_lock_enqueue_wait(env, sublock, 0);
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, lock);
- return result ?: CLO_REPEAT;
-}
-
-/**
- * Tries to advance a state machine of a given sub-lock toward enqueuing of
- * the top-lock.
- *
- * \retval 0 if state-transition can proceed
- * \retval -ve otherwise.
- */
-static int lov_lock_enqueue_one(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
- struct cl_lock *sublock,
- struct cl_io *io, __u32 enqflags, int last)
-{
- int result;
-
- /* first, try to enqueue a sub-lock ... */
- result = cl_enqueue_try(env, sublock, io, enqflags);
- if ((sublock->cll_state == CLS_ENQUEUED) && !(enqflags & CEF_AGL)) {
- /* if it is enqueued, try to `wait' on it---maybe it's already
- * granted
- */
- result = cl_wait_try(env, sublock);
- if (result == CLO_REENQUEUED)
- result = CLO_WAIT;
- }
- /*
- * If CEF_ASYNC flag is set, then all sub-locks can be enqueued in
- * parallel, otherwise---enqueue has to wait until sub-lock is granted
- * before proceeding to the next one.
- */
- if ((result == CLO_WAIT) && (sublock->cll_state <= CLS_HELD) &&
- (enqflags & CEF_ASYNC) && (!last || (enqflags & CEF_AGL)))
- result = 0;
- return result;
-}
-
-/**
- * Helper function for lov_lock_enqueue() that creates missing sub-lock.
- */
-static int lov_sublock_fill(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_lock *parent,
- struct cl_io *io, struct lov_lock *lck, int idx)
-{
- struct lov_lock_link *link = NULL;
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- int result;
-
- LASSERT(parent->cll_depth == 1);
- cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
- sublock = lov_sublock_alloc(env, io, lck, idx, &link);
- if (!IS_ERR(sublock))
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, sublock);
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
-
- if (!IS_ERR(sublock)) {
- cl_lock_get_trust(sublock);
- if (parent->cll_state == CLS_QUEUING &&
- !lck->lls_sub[idx].sub_lock) {
- lov_sublock_adopt(env, lck, sublock, idx, link);
- } else {
- kmem_cache_free(lov_lock_link_kmem, link);
- /* other thread allocated sub-lock, or enqueue is no
- * longer going on
- */
- cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
- cl_lock_unhold(env, sublock, "lov-parent", parent);
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
- }
- cl_lock_mutex_put(env, sublock);
- cl_lock_put(env, sublock);
- result = CLO_REPEAT;
- } else
- result = PTR_ERR(sublock);
- return result;
+ kvfree(lovlck);
}
/**
@@ -543,529 +225,59 @@ static int lov_sublock_fill(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_lock *parent,
*/
static int lov_lock_enqueue(const struct lu_env *env,
const struct cl_lock_slice *slice,
- struct cl_io *io, __u32 enqflags)
+ struct cl_io *io, struct cl_sync_io *anchor)
{
- struct cl_lock *lock = slice->cls_lock;
- struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, lock);
+ struct cl_lock *lock = slice->cls_lock;
+ struct lov_lock *lovlck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
int i;
- int result;
- enum cl_lock_state minstate;
+ int rc = 0;
- for (result = 0, minstate = CLS_FREEING, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
- int rc;
- struct lovsub_lock *sub;
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
+ for (i = 0; i < lovlck->lls_nr; ++i) {
+ struct lov_lock_sub *lls = &lovlck->lls_sub[i];
struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
- if (lock->cll_state != CLS_QUEUING) {
- /*
- * Lock might have left QUEUING state if previous
- * iteration released its mutex. Stop enqueing in this
- * case and let the upper layer to decide what to do.
- */
- LASSERT(i > 0 && result != 0);
- break;
- }
-
- lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- sub = lls->sub_lock;
- /*
- * Sub-lock might have been canceled, while top-lock was
- * cached.
- */
- if (!sub) {
- result = lov_sublock_fill(env, lock, io, lck, i);
- /* lov_sublock_fill() released @lock mutex,
- * restart.
- */
+ subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, lock, lls);
+ if (IS_ERR(subenv)) {
+ rc = PTR_ERR(subenv);
break;
}
- sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
- if (rc == 0) {
- lov_sublock_hold(env, lck, i);
- rc = lov_lock_enqueue_one(subenv->lse_env, lck, sublock,
- subenv->lse_io, enqflags,
- i == lck->lls_nr - 1);
- minstate = min(minstate, sublock->cll_state);
- if (rc == CLO_WAIT) {
- switch (sublock->cll_state) {
- case CLS_QUEUING:
- /* take recursive mutex, the lock is
- * released in lov_lock_enqueue_wait.
- */
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, sublock);
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure,
- subenv);
- rc = lov_lock_enqueue_wait(env, lck,
- sublock);
- break;
- case CLS_CACHED:
- cl_lock_get(sublock);
- /* take recursive mutex of sublock */
- cl_lock_mutex_get(env, sublock);
- /* need to release all locks in closure
- * otherwise it may deadlock. LU-2683.
- */
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure,
- subenv);
- /* sublock and parent are held. */
- rc = lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i,
- 1, rc);
- cl_lock_mutex_put(env, sublock);
- cl_lock_put(env, sublock);
- break;
- default:
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure,
- subenv);
- break;
- }
- } else {
- LASSERT(!sublock->cll_conflict);
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
- }
- }
- result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
- if (result != 0)
+ rc = cl_lock_enqueue(subenv->lse_env, subenv->lse_io,
+ &lls->sub_lock, anchor);
+ lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
+ if (rc != 0)
break;
- }
- cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
- return result ?: minstate >= CLS_ENQUEUED ? 0 : CLO_WAIT;
-}
-
-static int lov_lock_unuse(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
-{
- struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
- int i;
- int result;
-
- for (result = 0, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
- int rc;
- struct lovsub_lock *sub;
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
- struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
- /* top-lock state cannot change concurrently, because single
- * thread (one that released the last hold) carries unlocking
- * to the completion.
- */
- LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_INTRANSIT);
- lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- sub = lls->sub_lock;
- if (!sub)
- continue;
-
- sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
- if (rc == 0) {
- if (lls->sub_flags & LSF_HELD) {
- LASSERT(sublock->cll_state == CLS_HELD ||
- sublock->cll_state == CLS_ENQUEUED);
- rc = cl_unuse_try(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
- rc = lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 0, rc);
- }
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
- }
- result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
+ lls->sub_is_enqueued = 1;
}
-
- if (result == 0 && lck->lls_cancel_race) {
- lck->lls_cancel_race = 0;
- result = -ESTALE;
- }
- cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
- return result;
+ return rc;
}
static void lov_lock_cancel(const struct lu_env *env,
const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
{
- struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
+ struct cl_lock *lock = slice->cls_lock;
+ struct lov_lock *lovlck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
int i;
- int result;
- for (result = 0, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
- int rc;
- struct lovsub_lock *sub;
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
+ for (i = 0; i < lovlck->lls_nr; ++i) {
+ struct lov_lock_sub *lls = &lovlck->lls_sub[i];
+ struct cl_lock *sublock = &lls->sub_lock;
struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
- /* top-lock state cannot change concurrently, because single
- * thread (one that released the last hold) carries unlocking
- * to the completion.
- */
- lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- sub = lls->sub_lock;
- if (!sub)
- continue;
-
- sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
- if (rc == 0) {
- if (!(lls->sub_flags & LSF_HELD)) {
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
- continue;
- }
-
- switch (sublock->cll_state) {
- case CLS_HELD:
- rc = cl_unuse_try(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
- lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 0, 0);
- break;
- default:
- lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 1, 0);
- break;
- }
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
- }
-
- if (rc == CLO_REPEAT) {
- --i;
- continue;
- }
-
- result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
- }
-
- if (result)
- CL_LOCK_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, slice->cls_lock,
- "lov_lock_cancel fails with %d.\n", result);
-
- cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
-}
-
-static int lov_lock_wait(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
-{
- struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
- enum cl_lock_state minstate;
- int reenqueued;
- int result;
- int i;
-
-again:
- for (result = 0, minstate = CLS_FREEING, i = 0, reenqueued = 0;
- i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
- int rc;
- struct lovsub_lock *sub;
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
- struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
-
- lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- sub = lls->sub_lock;
- sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
- if (rc == 0) {
- LASSERT(sublock->cll_state >= CLS_ENQUEUED);
- if (sublock->cll_state < CLS_HELD)
- rc = cl_wait_try(env, sublock);
-
- minstate = min(minstate, sublock->cll_state);
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
- }
- if (rc == CLO_REENQUEUED) {
- reenqueued++;
- rc = 0;
- }
- result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
- if (result != 0)
- break;
- }
- /* Each sublock only can be reenqueued once, so will not loop
- * forever.
- */
- if (result == 0 && reenqueued != 0)
- goto again;
- cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
- return result ?: minstate >= CLS_HELD ? 0 : CLO_WAIT;
-}
-
-static int lov_lock_use(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
-{
- struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
- int result;
- int i;
-
- LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_INTRANSIT);
-
- for (result = 0, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
- int rc;
- struct lovsub_lock *sub;
- struct cl_lock *sublock;
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
- struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
-
- LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_INTRANSIT);
-
- lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- sub = lls->sub_lock;
- if (!sub) {
- /*
- * Sub-lock might have been canceled, while top-lock was
- * cached.
- */
- result = -ESTALE;
- break;
- }
-
- sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
- rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
- if (rc == 0) {
- LASSERT(sublock->cll_state != CLS_FREEING);
- lov_sublock_hold(env, lck, i);
- if (sublock->cll_state == CLS_CACHED) {
- rc = cl_use_try(subenv->lse_env, sublock, 0);
- if (rc != 0)
- rc = lov_sublock_release(env, lck,
- i, 1, rc);
- } else if (sublock->cll_state == CLS_NEW) {
- /* Sub-lock might have been canceled, while
- * top-lock was cached.
- */
- result = -ESTALE;
- lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 1, result);
- }
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
- }
- result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
- if (result != 0)
- break;
- }
-
- if (lck->lls_cancel_race) {
- /*
- * If there is unlocking happened at the same time, then
- * sublock_lock state should be FREEING, and lov_sublock_lock
- * should return CLO_REPEAT. In this case, it should return
- * ESTALE, and up layer should reset the lock state to be NEW.
- */
- lck->lls_cancel_race = 0;
- LASSERT(result != 0);
- result = -ESTALE;
- }
- cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
- return result;
-}
-
-/**
- * Check if the extent region \a descr is covered by \a child against the
- * specific \a stripe.
- */
-static int lov_lock_stripe_is_matching(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lov_object *lov, int stripe,
- const struct cl_lock_descr *child,
- const struct cl_lock_descr *descr)
-{
- struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = lov->lo_lsm;
- u64 start;
- u64 end;
- int result;
-
- if (lov_r0(lov)->lo_nr == 1)
- return cl_lock_ext_match(child, descr);
-
- /*
- * For a multi-stripes object:
- * - make sure the descr only covers child's stripe, and
- * - check if extent is matching.
- */
- start = cl_offset(&lov->lo_cl, descr->cld_start);
- end = cl_offset(&lov->lo_cl, descr->cld_end + 1) - 1;
- result = 0;
- /* glimpse should work on the object with LOV EA hole. */
- if (end - start <= lsm->lsm_stripe_size) {
- int idx;
-
- idx = lov_stripe_number(lsm, start);
- if (idx == stripe ||
- unlikely(!lov_r0(lov)->lo_sub[idx])) {
- idx = lov_stripe_number(lsm, end);
- if (idx == stripe ||
- unlikely(!lov_r0(lov)->lo_sub[idx]))
- result = 1;
- }
- }
-
- if (result != 0) {
- struct cl_lock_descr *subd = &lov_env_info(env)->lti_ldescr;
- u64 sub_start;
- u64 sub_end;
-
- subd->cld_obj = NULL; /* don't need sub object at all */
- subd->cld_mode = descr->cld_mode;
- subd->cld_gid = descr->cld_gid;
- result = lov_stripe_intersects(lsm, stripe, start, end,
- &sub_start, &sub_end);
- LASSERT(result);
- subd->cld_start = cl_index(child->cld_obj, sub_start);
- subd->cld_end = cl_index(child->cld_obj, sub_end);
- result = cl_lock_ext_match(child, subd);
- }
- return result;
-}
-
-/**
- * An implementation of cl_lock_operations::clo_fits_into() method.
- *
- * Checks whether a lock (given by \a slice) is suitable for \a
- * io. Multi-stripe locks can be used only for "quick" io, like truncate, or
- * O_APPEND write.
- *
- * \see ccc_lock_fits_into().
- */
-static int lov_lock_fits_into(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_lock_slice *slice,
- const struct cl_lock_descr *need,
- const struct cl_io *io)
-{
- struct lov_lock *lov = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct lov_object *obj = cl2lov(slice->cls_obj);
- int result;
-
- LASSERT(cl_object_same(need->cld_obj, slice->cls_obj));
- LASSERT(lov->lls_nr > 0);
-
- /* for top lock, it's necessary to match enq flags otherwise it will
- * run into problem if a sublock is missing and reenqueue.
- */
- if (need->cld_enq_flags != lov->lls_orig.cld_enq_flags)
- return 0;
-
- if (need->cld_mode == CLM_GROUP)
- /*
- * always allow to match group lock.
- */
- result = cl_lock_ext_match(&lov->lls_orig, need);
- else if (lov->lls_nr == 1) {
- struct cl_lock_descr *got = &lov->lls_sub[0].sub_got;
-
- result = lov_lock_stripe_is_matching(env,
- cl2lov(slice->cls_obj),
- lov->lls_sub[0].sub_stripe,
- got, need);
- } else if (io->ci_type != CIT_SETATTR && io->ci_type != CIT_MISC &&
- !cl_io_is_append(io) && need->cld_mode != CLM_PHANTOM)
- /*
- * Multi-stripe locks are only suitable for `quick' IO and for
- * glimpse.
- */
- result = 0;
- else
- /*
- * Most general case: multi-stripe existing lock, and
- * (potentially) multi-stripe @need lock. Check that @need is
- * covered by @lov's sub-locks.
- *
- * For now, ignore lock expansions made by the server, and
- * match against original lock extent.
- */
- result = cl_lock_ext_match(&lov->lls_orig, need);
- CDEBUG(D_DLMTRACE, DDESCR"/"DDESCR" %d %d/%d: %d\n",
- PDESCR(&lov->lls_orig), PDESCR(&lov->lls_sub[0].sub_got),
- lov->lls_sub[0].sub_stripe, lov->lls_nr, lov_r0(obj)->lo_nr,
- result);
- return result;
-}
-
-void lov_lock_unlink(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lov_lock_link *link, struct lovsub_lock *sub)
-{
- struct lov_lock *lck = link->lll_super;
- struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sub->lss_cl.cls_lock));
-
- list_del_init(&link->lll_list);
- LASSERT(lck->lls_sub[link->lll_idx].sub_lock == sub);
- /* yank this sub-lock from parent's array */
- lck->lls_sub[link->lll_idx].sub_lock = NULL;
- LASSERT(lck->lls_nr_filled > 0);
- lck->lls_nr_filled--;
- lu_ref_del(&parent->cll_reference, "lov-child", sub->lss_cl.cls_lock);
- cl_lock_put(env, parent);
- kmem_cache_free(lov_lock_link_kmem, link);
-}
-
-struct lov_lock_link *lov_lock_link_find(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct lov_lock *lck,
- struct lovsub_lock *sub)
-{
- struct lov_lock_link *scan;
-
- LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sub->lss_cl.cls_lock));
-
- list_for_each_entry(scan, &sub->lss_parents, lll_list) {
- if (scan->lll_super == lck)
- return scan;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-/**
- * An implementation of cl_lock_operations::clo_delete() method. This is
- * invoked for "top-to-bottom" delete, when lock destruction starts from the
- * top-lock, e.g., as a result of inode destruction.
- *
- * Unlinks top-lock from all its sub-locks. Sub-locks are not deleted there:
- * this is done separately elsewhere:
- *
- * - for inode destruction, lov_object_delete() calls cl_object_kill() for
- * each sub-object, purging its locks;
- *
- * - in other cases (e.g., a fatal error with a top-lock) sub-locks are
- * left in the cache.
- */
-static void lov_lock_delete(const struct lu_env *env,
- const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
-{
- struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
- struct lov_lock_link *link;
- int rc;
- int i;
-
- LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_FREEING);
-
- for (i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
- struct lov_lock_sub *lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- struct lovsub_lock *lsl = lls->sub_lock;
-
- if (!lsl) /* already removed */
+ if (!lls->sub_is_enqueued)
continue;
- rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, NULL);
- if (rc == CLO_REPEAT) {
- --i;
- continue;
+ lls->sub_is_enqueued = 0;
+ subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, lock, lls);
+ if (!IS_ERR(subenv)) {
+ cl_lock_cancel(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
+ lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
+ } else {
+ CL_LOCK_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, slice->cls_lock,
+ "lov_lock_cancel fails with %ld.\n",
+ PTR_ERR(subenv));
}
-
- LASSERT(rc == 0);
- LASSERT(lsl->lss_cl.cls_lock->cll_state < CLS_FREEING);
-
- if (lls->sub_flags & LSF_HELD)
- lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 1, 0);
-
- link = lov_lock_link_find(env, lck, lsl);
- LASSERT(link);
- lov_lock_unlink(env, link, lsl);
- LASSERT(!lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock);
-
- lov_sublock_unlock(env, lsl, closure, NULL);
}
-
- cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
}
static int lov_lock_print(const struct lu_env *env, void *cookie,
@@ -1079,12 +291,8 @@ static int lov_lock_print(const struct lu_env *env, void *cookie,
struct lov_lock_sub *sub;
sub = &lck->lls_sub[i];
- (*p)(env, cookie, " %d %x: ", i, sub->sub_flags);
- if (sub->sub_lock)
- cl_lock_print(env, cookie, p,
- sub->sub_lock->lss_cl.cls_lock);
- else
- (*p)(env, cookie, "---\n");
+ (*p)(env, cookie, " %d %x: ", i, sub->sub_is_enqueued);
+ cl_lock_print(env, cookie, p, &sub->sub_lock);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -1092,12 +300,7 @@ static int lov_lock_print(const struct lu_env *env, void *cookie,
static const struct cl_lock_operations lov_lock_ops = {
.clo_fini = lov_lock_fini,
.clo_enqueue = lov_lock_enqueue,
- .clo_wait = lov_lock_wait,
- .clo_use = lov_lock_use,
- .clo_unuse = lov_lock_unuse,
.clo_cancel = lov_lock_cancel,
- .clo_fits_into = lov_lock_fits_into,
- .clo_delete = lov_lock_delete,
.clo_print = lov_lock_print
};
@@ -1105,14 +308,13 @@ int lov_lock_init_raid0(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
struct cl_lock *lock, const struct cl_io *io)
{
struct lov_lock *lck;
- int result;
+ int result = 0;
- lck = kmem_cache_zalloc(lov_lock_kmem, GFP_NOFS);
- if (lck) {
+ lck = lov_lock_sub_init(env, obj, lock);
+ if (!IS_ERR(lck))
cl_lock_slice_add(lock, &lck->lls_cl, obj, &lov_lock_ops);
- result = lov_lock_sub_init(env, lck, io);
- } else
- result = -ENOMEM;
+ else
+ result = PTR_ERR(lck);
return result;
}
@@ -1147,21 +349,9 @@ int lov_lock_init_empty(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
lck = kmem_cache_zalloc(lov_lock_kmem, GFP_NOFS);
if (lck) {
cl_lock_slice_add(lock, &lck->lls_cl, obj, &lov_empty_lock_ops);
- lck->lls_orig = lock->cll_descr;
result = 0;
}
return result;
}
-static struct cl_lock_closure *lov_closure_get(const struct lu_env *env,
- struct cl_lock *parent)
-{
- struct cl_lock_closure *closure;
-
- closure = &lov_env_info(env)->lti_closure;
- LASSERT(list_empty(&closure->clc_list));
- cl_lock_closure_init(env, closure, parent, 1);
- return closure;
-}
-
/** @} lov */