1 files changed, 7 insertions, 123 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
index cad3afbd035f..0df671318ae4 100644
--- a/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-mn10300/unaligned.h
@@ -8,129 +8,13 @@
  * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
  * 2 of the Licence, or (at your option) any later version.
  */
-#ifndef _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
-#define _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
+#ifndef _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H
+#define _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H
 
-#include <asm/types.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/access_ok.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 
-#if 0
-extern int __bug_unaligned_x(void *ptr);
+#define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_le
+#define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_le
 
-/*
- * What is the most efficient way of loading/storing an unaligned value?
- *
- * That is the subject of this file.  Efficiency here is defined as
- * minimum code size with minimum register usage for the common cases.
- * It is currently not believed that long longs are common, so we
- * trade efficiency for the chars, shorts and longs against the long
- * longs.
- *
- * Current stats with gcc 2.7.2.2 for these functions:
- *
- *	ptrsize	get:	code	regs	put:	code	regs
- *	1		1	1		1	2
- *	2		3	2		3	2
- *	4		7	3		7	3
- *	8		20	6		16	6
- *
- * gcc 2.95.1 seems to code differently:
- *
- *	ptrsize	get:	code	regs	put:	code	regs
- *	1		1	1		1	2
- *	2		3	2		3	2
- *	4		7	4		7	4
- *	8		19	8		15	6
- *
- * which may or may not be more efficient (depending upon whether
- * you can afford the extra registers).  Hopefully the gcc 2.95
- * is inteligent enough to decide if it is better to use the
- * extra register, but evidence so far seems to suggest otherwise.
- *
- * Unfortunately, gcc is not able to optimise the high word
- * out of long long >> 32, or the low word from long long << 32
- */
-
-#define __get_unaligned_2(__p)					\
-	(__p[0] | __p[1] << 8)
-
-#define __get_unaligned_4(__p)					\
-	(__p[0] | __p[1] << 8 | __p[2] << 16 | __p[3] << 24)
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr)					\
-({								\
-	unsigned int __v1, __v2;				\
-	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __v;					\
-	__u8 *__p = (__u8 *)(ptr);				\
-								\
-	switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {				\
-	case 1:	__v = *(ptr);			break;		\
-	case 2: __v = __get_unaligned_2(__p);	break;		\
-	case 4: __v = __get_unaligned_4(__p);	break;		\
-	case 8:							\
-		__v2 = __get_unaligned_4((__p+4));		\
-		__v1 = __get_unaligned_4(__p);			\
-		__v = ((unsigned long long)__v2 << 32 | __v1);	\
-		break;						\
-	default: __v = __bug_unaligned_x(__p);	break;		\
-	}							\
-	__v;							\
-})
-
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_2(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	*__p++ = __v;
-	*__p++ = __v >> 8;
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_4(__u32 __v, register __u8 *__p)
-{
-	__put_unaligned_2(__v >> 16, __p + 2);
-	__put_unaligned_2(__v, __p);
-}
-
-static inline void __put_unaligned_8(const unsigned long long __v, __u8 *__p)
-{
-	/*
-	 * tradeoff: 8 bytes of stack for all unaligned puts (2
-	 * instructions), or an extra register in the long long
-	 * case - go for the extra register.
-	 */
-	__put_unaligned_4(__v >> 32, __p + 4);
-	__put_unaligned_4(__v, __p);
-}
-
-/*
- * Try to store an unaligned value as efficiently as possible.
- */
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr)						\
-	({								\
-		switch (sizeof(*(ptr))) {				\
-		case 1:							\
-			*(ptr) = (val);					\
-			break;						\
-		case 2:							\
-			__put_unaligned_2((val), (__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;						\
-		case 4:							\
-			__put_unaligned_4((val), (__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;						\
-		case 8:							\
-			__put_unaligned_8((val), (__u8 *)(ptr));	\
-			break;						\
-		default:						\
-			__bug_unaligned_x(ptr);				\
-			break;						\
-		}							\
-		(void) 0;						\
-	})
-
-
-#else
-
-#define get_unaligned(ptr) (*(ptr))
-#define put_unaligned(val, ptr) ({ *(ptr) = (val); (void) 0; })
-
-#endif
-
-#endif
+#endif /* _ASM_MN10300_UNALIGNED_H */