diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/futex.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 326 |
1 files changed, 282 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index bd18f60e4c6c..03c518e9747e 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -325,6 +325,12 @@ static inline bool should_fail_futex(bool fshared) } #endif /* CONFIG_FAIL_FUTEX */ +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT +static void compat_exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr); +#else +static inline void compat_exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) { } +#endif + static inline void futex_get_mm(union futex_key *key) { mmgrab(key->private.mm); @@ -890,7 +896,7 @@ static void put_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state) * Kernel cleans up PI-state, but userspace is likely hosed. * (Robust-futex cleanup is separate and might save the day for userspace.) */ -void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) +static void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) { struct list_head *next, *head = &curr->pi_state_list; struct futex_pi_state *pi_state; @@ -960,7 +966,8 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) } raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock); } - +#else +static inline void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) { } #endif /* @@ -1169,16 +1176,47 @@ out_error: return ret; } +/** + * wait_for_owner_exiting - Block until the owner has exited + * @exiting: Pointer to the exiting task + * + * Caller must hold a refcount on @exiting. + */ +static void wait_for_owner_exiting(int ret, struct task_struct *exiting) +{ + if (ret != -EBUSY) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(exiting); + return; + } + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EBUSY && !exiting)) + return; + + mutex_lock(&exiting->futex_exit_mutex); + /* + * No point in doing state checking here. If the waiter got here + * while the task was in exec()->exec_futex_release() then it can + * have any FUTEX_STATE_* value when the waiter has acquired the + * mutex. OK, if running, EXITING or DEAD if it reached exit() + * already. Highly unlikely and not a problem. Just one more round + * through the futex maze. + */ + mutex_unlock(&exiting->futex_exit_mutex); + + put_task_struct(exiting); +} + static int handle_exit_race(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct task_struct *tsk) { u32 uval2; /* - * If PF_EXITPIDONE is not yet set, then try again. + * If the futex exit state is not yet FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, tell the + * caller that the alleged owner is busy. */ - if (tsk && !(tsk->flags & PF_EXITPIDONE)) - return -EAGAIN; + if (tsk && tsk->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_DEAD) + return -EBUSY; /* * Reread the user space value to handle the following situation: @@ -1196,8 +1234,9 @@ static int handle_exit_race(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, * *uaddr = 0xC0000000; tsk = get_task(PID); * } if (!tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) { * ... attach(); - * tsk->flags |= PF_EXITPIDONE; } else { - * if (!(tsk->flags & PF_EXITPIDONE)) + * tsk->futex_state = } else { + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD; if (tsk->futex_state != + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD) * return -EAGAIN; * return -ESRCH; <--- FAIL * } @@ -1228,7 +1267,8 @@ static int handle_exit_race(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, * it after doing proper sanity checks. */ static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key, - struct futex_pi_state **ps) + struct futex_pi_state **ps, + struct task_struct **exiting) { pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK; struct futex_pi_state *pi_state; @@ -1253,22 +1293,33 @@ static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key, } /* - * We need to look at the task state flags to figure out, - * whether the task is exiting. To protect against the do_exit - * change of the task flags, we do this protected by - * p->pi_lock: + * We need to look at the task state to figure out, whether the + * task is exiting. To protect against the change of the task state + * in futex_exit_release(), we do this protected by p->pi_lock: */ raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock); - if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_EXITING)) { + if (unlikely(p->futex_state != FUTEX_STATE_OK)) { /* - * The task is on the way out. When PF_EXITPIDONE is - * set, we know that the task has finished the - * cleanup: + * The task is on the way out. When the futex state is + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD, we know that the task has finished + * the cleanup: */ int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock); - put_task_struct(p); + /* + * If the owner task is between FUTEX_STATE_EXITING and + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD then store the task pointer and keep + * the reference on the task struct. The calling code will + * drop all locks, wait for the task to reach + * FUTEX_STATE_DEAD and then drop the refcount. This is + * required to prevent a live lock when the current task + * preempted the exiting task between the two states. + */ + if (ret == -EBUSY) + *exiting = p; + else + put_task_struct(p); return ret; } @@ -1307,7 +1358,8 @@ static int attach_to_pi_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, union futex_key *key, static int lookup_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, - union futex_key *key, struct futex_pi_state **ps) + union futex_key *key, struct futex_pi_state **ps, + struct task_struct **exiting) { struct futex_q *top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb, key); @@ -1322,7 +1374,7 @@ static int lookup_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, * We are the first waiter - try to look up the owner based on * @uval and attach to it. */ - return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, uval, key, ps); + return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, uval, key, ps, exiting); } static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval) @@ -1350,6 +1402,8 @@ static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval) * lookup * @task: the task to perform the atomic lock work for. This will * be "current" except in the case of requeue pi. + * @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task + * which is in the middle of exiting * @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0) * * Return: @@ -1358,11 +1412,17 @@ static int lock_pi_update_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, u32 newval) * - <0 - error * * The hb->lock and futex_key refs shall be held by the caller. + * + * @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds + * a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it + * after waiting for the exit to complete. */ static int futex_lock_pi_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, union futex_key *key, struct futex_pi_state **ps, - struct task_struct *task, int set_waiters) + struct task_struct *task, + struct task_struct **exiting, + int set_waiters) { u32 uval, newval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(task); struct futex_q *top_waiter; @@ -1432,7 +1492,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi_atomic(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, * attach to the owner. If that fails, no harm done, we only * set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit in the user space variable. */ - return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, newval, key, ps); + return attach_to_pi_owner(uaddr, newval, key, ps, exiting); } /** @@ -1480,7 +1540,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q) /* * Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've released - * the hb->lock. wake_q_add() grabs reference to p. + * the hb->lock. */ wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, p); } @@ -1850,6 +1910,8 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key, * @key1: the from futex key * @key2: the to futex key * @ps: address to store the pi_state pointer + * @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task + * which is in the middle of exiting * @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0) * * Try and get the lock on behalf of the top waiter if we can do it atomically. @@ -1857,16 +1919,20 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key, * then direct futex_lock_pi_atomic() to force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit. * hb1 and hb2 must be held by the caller. * + * @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds + * a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it + * after waiting for the exit to complete. + * * Return: * - 0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically; * - >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter * - <0 - error */ -static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, - struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, - struct futex_hash_bucket *hb2, - union futex_key *key1, union futex_key *key2, - struct futex_pi_state **ps, int set_waiters) +static int +futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, + struct futex_hash_bucket *hb2, union futex_key *key1, + union futex_key *key2, struct futex_pi_state **ps, + struct task_struct **exiting, int set_waiters) { struct futex_q *top_waiter = NULL; u32 curval; @@ -1903,7 +1969,7 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, */ vpid = task_pid_vnr(top_waiter->task); ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(pifutex, hb2, key2, ps, top_waiter->task, - set_waiters); + exiting, set_waiters); if (ret == 1) { requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2, hb2); return vpid; @@ -2032,6 +2098,8 @@ retry_private: } if (requeue_pi && (task_count - nr_wake < nr_requeue)) { + struct task_struct *exiting = NULL; + /* * Attempt to acquire uaddr2 and wake the top waiter. If we * intend to requeue waiters, force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS @@ -2039,7 +2107,8 @@ retry_private: * faults rather in the requeue loop below. */ ret = futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(uaddr2, hb1, hb2, &key1, - &key2, &pi_state, nr_requeue); + &key2, &pi_state, + &exiting, nr_requeue); /* * At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or is @@ -2066,7 +2135,8 @@ retry_private: * If that call succeeds then we have pi_state and an * initial refcount on it. */ - ret = lookup_pi_state(uaddr2, ret, hb2, &key2, &pi_state); + ret = lookup_pi_state(uaddr2, ret, hb2, &key2, + &pi_state, &exiting); } switch (ret) { @@ -2084,17 +2154,24 @@ retry_private: if (!ret) goto retry; goto out; + case -EBUSY: case -EAGAIN: /* * Two reasons for this: - * - Owner is exiting and we just wait for the + * - EBUSY: Owner is exiting and we just wait for the * exit to complete. - * - The user space value changed. + * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed. */ double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2); hb_waiters_dec(hb2); put_futex_key(&key2); put_futex_key(&key1); + /* + * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of + * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise + * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock. + */ + wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting); cond_resched(); goto retry; default: @@ -2801,6 +2878,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to; struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL; + struct task_struct *exiting = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; @@ -2822,7 +2900,8 @@ retry: retry_private: hb = queue_lock(&q); - ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current, 0); + ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(uaddr, hb, &q.key, &q.pi_state, current, + &exiting, 0); if (unlikely(ret)) { /* * Atomic work succeeded and we got the lock, @@ -2835,15 +2914,22 @@ retry_private: goto out_unlock_put_key; case -EFAULT: goto uaddr_faulted; + case -EBUSY: case -EAGAIN: /* * Two reasons for this: - * - Task is exiting and we just wait for the + * - EBUSY: Task is exiting and we just wait for the * exit to complete. - * - The user space value changed. + * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed. */ queue_unlock(hb); put_futex_key(&q.key); + /* + * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of + * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise + * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock. + */ + wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting); cond_resched(); goto retry; default: @@ -3452,11 +3538,16 @@ err_unlock: return ret; } +/* Constants for the pending_op argument of handle_futex_death */ +#define HANDLE_DEATH_PENDING true +#define HANDLE_DEATH_LIST false + /* * Process a futex-list entry, check whether it's owned by the * dying task, and do notification if so: */ -static int handle_futex_death(u32 __user *uaddr, struct task_struct *curr, int pi) +static int handle_futex_death(u32 __user *uaddr, struct task_struct *curr, + bool pi, bool pending_op) { u32 uval, uninitialized_var(nval), mval; int err; @@ -3469,6 +3560,42 @@ retry: if (get_user(uval, uaddr)) return -1; + /* + * Special case for regular (non PI) futexes. The unlock path in + * user space has two race scenarios: + * + * 1. The unlock path releases the user space futex value and + * before it can execute the futex() syscall to wake up + * waiters it is killed. + * + * 2. A woken up waiter is killed before it can acquire the + * futex in user space. + * + * In both cases the TID validation below prevents a wakeup of + * potential waiters which can cause these waiters to block + * forever. + * + * In both cases the following conditions are met: + * + * 1) task->robust_list->list_op_pending != NULL + * @pending_op == true + * 2) User space futex value == 0 + * 3) Regular futex: @pi == false + * + * If these conditions are met, it is safe to attempt waking up a + * potential waiter without touching the user space futex value and + * trying to set the OWNER_DIED bit. The user space futex value is + * uncontended and the rest of the user space mutex state is + * consistent, so a woken waiter will just take over the + * uncontended futex. Setting the OWNER_DIED bit would create + * inconsistent state and malfunction of the user space owner died + * handling. + */ + if (pending_op && !pi && !uval) { + futex_wake(uaddr, 1, 1, FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY); + return 0; + } + if ((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != task_pid_vnr(curr)) return 0; @@ -3547,7 +3674,7 @@ static inline int fetch_robust_entry(struct robust_list __user **entry, * * We silently return on any sign of list-walking problem. */ -void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) +static void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) { struct robust_list_head __user *head = curr->robust_list; struct robust_list __user *entry, *next_entry, *pending; @@ -3588,10 +3715,11 @@ void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) * A pending lock might already be on the list, so * don't process it twice: */ - if (entry != pending) + if (entry != pending) { if (handle_futex_death((void __user *)entry + futex_offset, - curr, pi)) + curr, pi, HANDLE_DEATH_LIST)) return; + } if (rc) return; entry = next_entry; @@ -3605,9 +3733,118 @@ void exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) cond_resched(); } - if (pending) + if (pending) { handle_futex_death((void __user *)pending + futex_offset, - curr, pip); + curr, pip, HANDLE_DEATH_PENDING); + } +} + +static void futex_cleanup(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + if (unlikely(tsk->robust_list)) { + exit_robust_list(tsk); + tsk->robust_list = NULL; + } + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (unlikely(tsk->compat_robust_list)) { + compat_exit_robust_list(tsk); + tsk->compat_robust_list = NULL; + } +#endif + + if (unlikely(!list_empty(&tsk->pi_state_list))) + exit_pi_state_list(tsk); +} + +/** + * futex_exit_recursive - Set the tasks futex state to FUTEX_STATE_DEAD + * @tsk: task to set the state on + * + * Set the futex exit state of the task lockless. The futex waiter code + * observes that state when a task is exiting and loops until the task has + * actually finished the futex cleanup. The worst case for this is that the + * waiter runs through the wait loop until the state becomes visible. + * + * This is called from the recursive fault handling path in do_exit(). + * + * This is best effort. Either the futex exit code has run already or + * not. If the OWNER_DIED bit has been set on the futex then the waiter can + * take it over. If not, the problem is pushed back to user space. If the + * futex exit code did not run yet, then an already queued waiter might + * block forever, but there is nothing which can be done about that. + */ +void futex_exit_recursive(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + /* If the state is FUTEX_STATE_EXITING then futex_exit_mutex is held */ + if (tsk->futex_state == FUTEX_STATE_EXITING) + mutex_unlock(&tsk->futex_exit_mutex); + tsk->futex_state = FUTEX_STATE_DEAD; +} + +static void futex_cleanup_begin(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + /* + * Prevent various race issues against a concurrent incoming waiter + * including live locks by forcing the waiter to block on + * tsk->futex_exit_mutex when it observes FUTEX_STATE_EXITING in + * attach_to_pi_owner(). + */ + mutex_lock(&tsk->futex_exit_mutex); + + /* + * Switch the state to FUTEX_STATE_EXITING under tsk->pi_lock. + * + * This ensures that all subsequent checks of tsk->futex_state in + * attach_to_pi_owner() must observe FUTEX_STATE_EXITING with + * tsk->pi_lock held. + * + * It guarantees also that a pi_state which was queued right before + * the state change under tsk->pi_lock by a concurrent waiter must + * be observed in exit_pi_state_list(). + */ + raw_spin_lock_irq(&tsk->pi_lock); + tsk->futex_state = FUTEX_STATE_EXITING; + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->pi_lock); +} + +static void futex_cleanup_end(struct task_struct *tsk, int state) +{ + /* + * Lockless store. The only side effect is that an observer might + * take another loop until it becomes visible. + */ + tsk->futex_state = state; + /* + * Drop the exit protection. This unblocks waiters which observed + * FUTEX_STATE_EXITING to reevaluate the state. + */ + mutex_unlock(&tsk->futex_exit_mutex); +} + +void futex_exec_release(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + /* + * The state handling is done for consistency, but in the case of + * exec() there is no way to prevent futher damage as the PID stays + * the same. But for the unlikely and arguably buggy case that a + * futex is held on exec(), this provides at least as much state + * consistency protection which is possible. + */ + futex_cleanup_begin(tsk); + futex_cleanup(tsk); + /* + * Reset the state to FUTEX_STATE_OK. The task is alive and about + * exec a new binary. + */ + futex_cleanup_end(tsk, FUTEX_STATE_OK); +} + +void futex_exit_release(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + futex_cleanup_begin(tsk); + futex_cleanup(tsk); + futex_cleanup_end(tsk, FUTEX_STATE_DEAD); } long do_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, ktime_t *timeout, @@ -3737,7 +3974,7 @@ static void __user *futex_uaddr(struct robust_list __user *entry, * * We silently return on any sign of list-walking problem. */ -void compat_exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) +static void compat_exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) { struct compat_robust_list_head __user *head = curr->compat_robust_list; struct robust_list __user *entry, *next_entry, *pending; @@ -3784,7 +4021,8 @@ void compat_exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) if (entry != pending) { void __user *uaddr = futex_uaddr(entry, futex_offset); - if (handle_futex_death(uaddr, curr, pi)) + if (handle_futex_death(uaddr, curr, pi, + HANDLE_DEATH_LIST)) return; } if (rc) @@ -3803,7 +4041,7 @@ void compat_exit_robust_list(struct task_struct *curr) if (pending) { void __user *uaddr = futex_uaddr(pending, futex_offset); - handle_futex_death(uaddr, curr, pip); + handle_futex_death(uaddr, curr, pip, HANDLE_DEATH_PENDING); } } |