diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 270 |
1 files changed, 166 insertions, 104 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index 352369dffbd9..e2cd2cc2e98f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertTrue(kconfig0.is_subset_of(kconfig0)) kconfig1 = kunit_config.Kconfig() - kconfig1.add_entry(kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) + kconfig1.add_entry('TEST', 'y') self.assertTrue(kconfig1.is_subset_of(kconfig1)) self.assertTrue(kconfig0.is_subset_of(kconfig1)) self.assertFalse(kconfig1.is_subset_of(kconfig0)) @@ -56,40 +56,28 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase): kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path) expected_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('UML', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MMU', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MK8', 'n')) - - self.assertEqual(kconfig.entries(), expected_kconfig.entries()) + expected_kconfig.add_entry('UML', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MMU', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MK8', 'n') + + self.assertEqual(kconfig, expected_kconfig) def test_write_to_file(self): kconfig_path = os.path.join(test_tmpdir, '.config') expected_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('UML', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MMU', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MK8', 'n')) + expected_kconfig.add_entry('UML', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MMU', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MK8', 'n') expected_kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) actual_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path) - - self.assertEqual(actual_kconfig.entries(), - expected_kconfig.entries()) + self.assertEqual(actual_kconfig, expected_kconfig) class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): @@ -222,23 +210,14 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_no_kunit_output(self): crash_log = test_data_path('test_insufficient_memory.log') - print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start() + print_mock = mock.patch('kunit_printer.Printer.print').start() with open(crash_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) - print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('invalid KTAP input!')) + print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not find any KTAP output!')) print_mock.stop() self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests)) - def test_crashed_test(self): - crashed_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-crash.log') - with open(crashed_log) as file: - result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( - file.readlines()) - self.assertEqual( - kunit_parser.TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED, - result.status) - def test_skipped_test(self): skipped_log = test_data_path('test_skip_tests.log') with open(skipped_log) as file: @@ -260,8 +239,8 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_ignores_hyphen(self): hyphen_log = test_data_path('test_strip_hyphen.log') - file = open(hyphen_log) - result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines()) + with open(hyphen_log) as file: + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines()) # A skipped test does not fail the whole suite. self.assertEqual( @@ -356,7 +335,7 @@ class LineStreamTest(unittest.TestCase): called_times = 0 def generator(): nonlocal called_times - for i in range(1,5): + for _ in range(1,5): called_times += 1 yield called_times, str(called_times) @@ -377,21 +356,53 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self): with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'): - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file') + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=['/nonexistent_file']) def test_valid_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig: - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[kunitconfig.name]) def test_dir_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w'): pass - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir]) + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig(self): + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT', 'y') + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT_TEST', 'm') + + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m') + pass + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig) + + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig_invalid(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=m') + + with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, '(?s)Multiple values.*CONFIG_KUNIT'): + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + def test_kconfig_add(self): + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() + want_kconfig.add_entry('NOT_REAL', 'y') + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kconfig_add=['CONFIG_NOT_REAL=y']) - self.assertIn(kunit_config.KconfigEntry('NOT_REAL', 'y'), tree._kconfig.entries()) + self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig) def test_invalid_arch(self): with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'not a valid arch, options are.*x86_64'): @@ -402,7 +413,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): return subprocess.Popen(['echo "hi\nbye"'], shell=True, text=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE) with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir: - tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir, load_config=False) + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) mock.patch.object(tree._ops, 'start', side_effect=fake_start).start() with self.assertRaises(ValueError): @@ -419,6 +430,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() # Should generate the .config @@ -436,6 +451,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[])) @@ -452,6 +471,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() # ... so we should trigger a call to build_config() @@ -468,9 +491,7 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): test_result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file) json_obj = kunit_json.get_json_result( test=test_result, - def_config='kunit_defconfig', - build_dir=None, - json_path='stdout') + metadata=kunit_json.Metadata()) return json.loads(json_obj) def test_failed_test_json(self): @@ -480,10 +501,10 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][0]) def test_crashed_test_json(self): - result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-crash.log') + result = self._json_for('test_kernel_panic_interrupt.log') self.assertEqual( - {'name': 'example_simple_test', 'status': 'ERROR'}, - result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][0]) + {'name': '', 'status': 'ERROR'}, + result["sub_groups"][2]["test_cases"][1]) def test_skipped_test_json(self): result = self._json_for('test_skip_tests.log') @@ -511,27 +532,28 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(path) as file: all_passed_log = file.readlines() - self.print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start() + self.print_mock = mock.patch('kunit_printer.Printer.print').start() self.addCleanup(mock.patch.stopall) - self.linux_source_mock = mock.Mock() - self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig = mock.Mock(return_value=True) - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True) - self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=all_passed_log) + self.mock_linux_init = mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree').start() + self.linux_source_mock = self.mock_linux_init.return_value + self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.return_value = True + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.return_value = True + self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.return_value = all_passed_log def test_config_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) def test_build_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['build'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['build']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, kunit.get_default_jobs(), '.kunit', None) + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(kunit.get_default_jobs(), '.kunit', None) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) def test_exec_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( @@ -539,7 +561,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) def test_run_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( @@ -549,29 +571,30 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_exec_passes_args_fail(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: - kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec']) self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) def test_run_passes_args_fail(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run']) self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) - self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('invalid KTAP input!')) + self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not find any KTAP output!')) def test_exec_no_tests(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=['TAP version 14', '1..0']) with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run']) + self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains(' 0 tests run!')) def test_exec_raw_output(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))) @@ -579,7 +602,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_run_raw_output(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: @@ -588,31 +611,37 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_run_raw_output_kunit(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=kunit']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))) self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains(' 0 tests run'))) + def test_run_raw_output_invalid(self): + self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) + with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=invalid']) + self.assertNotEqual(e.exception.code, 0) + def test_run_raw_output_does_not_take_positional_args(self): # --raw_output is a string flag, but we don't want it to consume # any positional arguments, only ones after an '=' self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output', 'filter_glob'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output', 'filter_glob']) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='filter_glob', timeout=300) def test_exec_timeout(self): timeout = 3453 - kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)]) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) def test_run_timeout(self): timeout = 3453 - kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)]) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout) @@ -620,7 +649,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_run_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300) @@ -628,60 +657,93 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_config_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir]) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) def test_build_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' jobs = kunit.get_default_jobs() - kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, jobs, build_dir, None) + kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir]) + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(jobs, build_dir, None) def test_exec_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir]) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) - @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') - def test_run_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): - mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + def test_run_kunitconfig(self): kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. - mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', - kconfig_add=None, - arch='um', - cross_compile=None, - qemu_config_path=None) + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_config_kunitconfig(self): + kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_config_alltests(self): + kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--alltests']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=[kunit_kernel.ALL_TESTS_CONFIG_PATH, 'mykunitconfig'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') - def test_config_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): + def test_run_multiple_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock - kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) + kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--kunitconfig=other']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig', 'other'], kconfig_add=None, arch='um', cross_compile=None, - qemu_config_path=None) + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) - @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') - def test_run_kconfig_add(self, mock_linux_init): - mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + def test_run_kconfig_add(self): kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. - mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path=None, - kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], - arch='um', - cross_compile=None, - qemu_config_path=None) + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=[], + kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_run_qemu_args(self): + kunit.main(['run', '--arch=x86_64', '--qemu_args', '-m 2048']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=[], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='x86_64', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=['-m', '2048']) def test_run_kernel_args(self): - kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=['a=1','b=2'], build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300) @@ -692,7 +754,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.return_value = ['TAP version 14', 'init: random output'] + want got = kunit._list_tests(self.linux_source_mock, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, '.kunit', None, 300, False, 'suite*', None, 'suite')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, 'suite*', None, 'suite')) self.assertEqual(got, want) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. @@ -703,11 +765,11 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): @mock.patch.object(kunit, '_list_tests') def test_run_isolated_by_suite(self, mock_tests): mock_tests.return_value = ['suite.test1', 'suite.test2', 'suite2.test1'] - kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=suite', 'suite*.test*'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=suite', 'suite*.test*']) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, '.kunit', None, 300, False, 'suite*.test*', None, 'suite')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, 'suite*.test*', None, 'suite')) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_has_calls([ mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test*', timeout=300), mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite2.test*', timeout=300), @@ -716,11 +778,11 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): @mock.patch.object(kunit, '_list_tests') def test_run_isolated_by_test(self, mock_tests): mock_tests.return_value = ['suite.test1', 'suite.test2', 'suite2.test1'] - kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=test', 'suite*'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=test', 'suite*']) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, '.kunit', None, 300, False, 'suite*', None, 'test')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, 'suite*', None, 'test')) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_has_calls([ mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test1', timeout=300), mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test2', timeout=300), |