aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c176
1 files changed, 155 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 1b7760d174d7..a08c67c8767e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -721,8 +721,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unknown opcode c4",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "arsh32 on imm 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x1122334485667788),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 7),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = -16069393,
},
{
"arsh32 on reg",
@@ -732,8 +742,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unknown opcode cc",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "arsh32 on reg 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0xffff55667788),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 15),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 43724,
},
{
"arsh64 on imm",
@@ -1823,6 +1844,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet read for SK_MSG",
@@ -2215,6 +2237,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"check cb access: half, wrong type",
@@ -2936,6 +2960,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
+ "alu32: mov u32 const",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_7, 0),
+ BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+ BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
"unpriv: partial copy of pointer",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -3281,6 +3318,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs corruption 2",
@@ -3311,6 +3349,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"raw_stack: skb_load_bytes, spilled regs + data",
@@ -3810,6 +3849,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test16 (arith on data_end)",
@@ -3912,6 +3952,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test21 (x += pkt_ptr, 2)",
@@ -3937,6 +3978,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test22 (x += pkt_ptr, 3)",
@@ -3967,6 +4009,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test23 (x += pkt_ptr, 4)",
@@ -3993,6 +4036,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to packet, off=0 size=8, R5(id=1,off=0,r=0)",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test24 (x += pkt_ptr, 5)",
@@ -4018,6 +4062,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test25 (marking on <, good access)",
@@ -5149,6 +5194,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid cgroup storage access 5",
@@ -5265,6 +5311,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=64 off=-2 size=4",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid per-cpu cgroup storage access 5",
@@ -7206,6 +7253,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result = REJECT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"map element value illegal alu op, 5",
@@ -7228,6 +7276,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"map element value is preserved across register spilling",
@@ -7721,6 +7770,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.retval = 0 /* csum_diff of 64-byte packet */,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
@@ -9683,6 +9733,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1",
@@ -9720,6 +9771,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', good access",
@@ -9758,6 +9810,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 2",
@@ -9776,6 +9829,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, good access",
@@ -9814,6 +9868,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 2",
@@ -9832,6 +9887,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', good access",
@@ -9849,6 +9905,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1",
@@ -9886,6 +9943,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, good access",
@@ -9922,6 +9980,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 2",
@@ -9959,6 +10018,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1",
@@ -9997,6 +10057,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, good access",
@@ -10015,6 +10076,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1",
@@ -10053,6 +10115,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', good access",
@@ -10089,6 +10152,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2",
@@ -10125,6 +10189,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' > pkt_data, bad access 1",
@@ -10162,6 +10227,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', good access",
@@ -10200,6 +10266,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data > pkt_meta', bad access 2",
@@ -10218,6 +10285,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, good access",
@@ -10256,6 +10324,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' < pkt_data, bad access 2",
@@ -10274,6 +10343,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', good access",
@@ -10291,6 +10361,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', bad access 1",
@@ -10328,6 +10399,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, good access",
@@ -10364,6 +10436,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' >= pkt_data, bad access 2",
@@ -10401,6 +10474,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data >= pkt_meta', bad access 1",
@@ -10439,6 +10513,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, good access",
@@ -10457,6 +10532,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1",
@@ -10495,6 +10571,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access",
@@ -10531,6 +10608,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2",
@@ -10635,6 +10713,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 8",
@@ -10648,6 +10727,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 9",
@@ -11122,6 +11202,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'inv'",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: two calls with args",
@@ -11987,6 +12068,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 },
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test2",
@@ -12130,6 +12212,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 },
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=2 size=8",
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: two calls that receive map_value_ptr_or_null via arg. test1",
@@ -12301,6 +12384,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.retval = POINTER_VALUE,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 2",
@@ -12332,6 +12416,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 3",
@@ -12367,6 +12452,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 4",
@@ -12401,6 +12487,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 5",
@@ -12434,6 +12521,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 6",
@@ -12469,6 +12557,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "R4 invalid mem access",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 7",
@@ -12503,6 +12592,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "R4 invalid mem access",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 8",
@@ -12543,6 +12633,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 9",
@@ -12584,6 +12675,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: caller stack init to zero or map_value_or_null",
@@ -12949,6 +13041,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R2 pkt is not allowed",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"xadd/w check whether src/dst got mangled, 1",
@@ -13435,6 +13528,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.errstr = "Unreleased reference",
.result = REJECT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"reference tracking: alloc, check, free in both subbranches",
@@ -13463,6 +13557,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"reference tracking in call: free reference in subprog",
@@ -13972,6 +14067,38 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
+ {
+ "check wire_len is not readable by sockets",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "check wire_len is readable by tc classifier",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "check wire_len is not writable by tc classifier",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, wire_len)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 leaks addr",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
@@ -14257,13 +14384,14 @@ out:
static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
int *passes, int *errors)
{
- int fd_prog, expected_ret, reject_from_alignment;
+ int fd_prog, expected_ret, alignment_prevented_execution;
int prog_len, prog_type = test->prog_type;
struct bpf_insn *prog = test->insns;
int map_fds[MAX_NR_MAPS];
const char *expected_err;
uint32_t expected_val;
uint32_t retval;
+ __u32 pflags;
int i, err;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++)
@@ -14274,8 +14402,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
do_test_fixup(test, prog_type, prog, map_fds);
prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog);
- fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len,
- test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT,
+ pflags = 0;
+ if (test->flags & F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
+ pflags |= BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT;
+ if (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+ pflags |= BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT;
+ fd_prog = bpf_verify_program(prog_type, prog, prog_len, pflags,
"GPL", 0, bpf_vlog, sizeof(bpf_vlog), 1);
expected_ret = unpriv && test->result_unpriv != UNDEF ?
@@ -14285,28 +14417,27 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
expected_val = unpriv && test->retval_unpriv ?
test->retval_unpriv : test->retval;
- reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
- (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
- strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
- if (reject_from_alignment) {
- printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
- strerror(errno));
- goto fail_log;
- }
-#endif
+ alignment_prevented_execution = 0;
+
if (expected_ret == ACCEPT) {
- if (fd_prog < 0 && !reject_from_alignment) {
+ if (fd_prog < 0) {
printf("FAIL\nFailed to load prog '%s'!\n",
strerror(errno));
goto fail_log;
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+ if (fd_prog >= 0 &&
+ (test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)) {
+ alignment_prevented_execution = 1;
+ goto test_ok;
+ }
+#endif
} else {
if (fd_prog >= 0) {
printf("FAIL\nUnexpected success to load!\n");
goto fail_log;
}
- if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err) && !reject_from_alignment) {
+ if (!strstr(bpf_vlog, expected_err)) {
printf("FAIL\nUnexpected error message!\n\tEXP: %s\n\tRES: %s\n",
expected_err, bpf_vlog);
goto fail_log;
@@ -14334,9 +14465,12 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
goto fail_log;
}
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+test_ok:
+#endif
(*passes)++;
- printf("OK%s\n", reject_from_alignment ?
- " (NOTE: reject due to unknown alignment)" : "");
+ printf("OK%s\n", alignment_prevented_execution ?
+ " (NOTE: not executed due to unknown alignment)" : "");
close_fds:
close(fd_prog);
for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++)
Copyright © 1996 – 2023 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.