| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Since we are going to introduce VFIO PCI HiSilicon ACC driver for live
migration in subsequent patches, move the ACC QM header file to a
common include dir.
Acked-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Acked-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Kai Ye <yekai13@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308184902.2242-2-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
|
|
The function usb_endpoint_maxp() (called by usb_maxpacket()) already
does the sanitazation of the USB endpoint max packet size. The call to
max_packet() does the same thing and is thus removed.
The macro max_packet() not being used anymore also gets removed.
Reviewed-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220306075524.706660-3-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The function usb_endpoint_maxp() (called by usb_maxpacket()) already
does the sanitazation of the USB endpoint max packet size. The call to
max_packet() does the same thing and is thus removed.
However, the macro max_packet() is kept because it is used elsewhere
in the file.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220306075524.706660-2-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
It makes sense that if the USB connector is a child of an USB port
providing VBUS supply, there is no need to do it again.
But this does not handle the case where VBUS is controlled by PWR from
USB host controller, without any regulator at all.
Support this by making VBUS pure optional.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220309093842.113260-1-alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The rts51x_read_mem() function should return negative error codes.
Currently if the kmalloc() fails it returns USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_ERROR (3)
which is treated as success by the callers.
Fixes: 065e60964e29 ("ums_realtek: do not use stack memory for DMA")
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304073504.GA26464@kili
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
kstrtoul() assumes the string contains the number only and is \0
terminated, this is not the case, as such things like:
earlyprintk=xdbc1,keep
go completely sideways. Use simple_strtoul() instead.
Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304152136.035911620@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
The generic earlyprintk= parsing already parses the optional ",keep",
no need to duplicate that in the xdbc driver.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304152135.975568860@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Currently loops_per_jiffy is set in tsc_early_init(), but then don't
switch to delay_tsc, with the result that delay_loop is used with
loops_per_jiffy set for delay_tsc.
Then in (late) tsc_init() lpj_fine is set (which is mostly unused) and
after which use_tsc_delay() is finally called.
Move both loops_per_jiffy and use_tsc_delay() into
tsc_enable_sched_clock() which is called the moment tsc_khz is
determined, be it early or late. Keeping the lot consistent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304152135.914397165@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-27-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-26-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-25-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-24-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-23-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
When list_for_each_entry() completes the iteration over the whole list
without breaking the loop, the iterator value will be a bogus pointer
computed based on the head element.
While it is safe to use the pointer to determine if it was computed
based on the head element, either with list_entry_is_head() or
&pos->member == head, using the iterator variable after the loop should
be avoided.
In preparation to limiting the scope of a list iterator to the list
traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-22-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list does not contain the expected element, the value of
list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point to a valid structure.
To avoid type confusion in such case, the list iterator
scope will be limited to list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of a list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Determining if an element was found is then simply checking if
the pointer is != NULL instead of using the potentially bogus pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-21-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list does not contain the expected element, the value of
list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point to a valid structure.
To avoid type confusion in such case, the list iterator
scope will be limited to list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of a list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Determining if an element was found is then simply checking if
the pointer is != NULL instead of using the potentially bogus pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-20-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list does not contain the expected element, the value of
list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point to a valid structure.
To avoid type confusion in such case, the list iterator
scope will be limited to list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of a list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Determining if an element was found is then simply checking if
the pointer is != NULL instead of using the potentially bogus pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-19-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list does not contain the expected element, the value of
list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point to a valid structure.
To avoid type confusion in such case, the list iterator
scope will be limited to list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of a list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found element [1].
Determining if an element was found is then simply checking if
the pointer is != NULL instead of using the potentially bogus pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-18-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-17-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-16-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-15-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-14-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-13-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-12-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-11-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-10-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-9-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-8-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-7-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-6-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-5-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-4-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-3-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
If the list representing the request queue does not contain the expected
request, the value of the list_for_each_entry() iterator will not point
to a valid structure. To avoid type confusion in such case, the list
iterator scope will be limited to the list_for_each_entry() loop.
In preparation to limiting scope of the list iterator to the list traversal
loop, use a dedicated pointer to point to the found request object [1].
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220308171818.384491-2-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
This reverts commit fc328a7d1fcce263db0b046917a66f3aa6e68719.
This commit - while attempting to fix a regression - has caused a number
of other problems. As the fallout from it is more significant than the
initial problem itself, revert it for now before we find a correct
solution.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220314192522.GA3031157@roeck-us.net/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20220314155509.552218-1-michael@walle.cc/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211217153555.9413-1-marcelo.jimenez@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Reported-and-bisected-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <marcelo.jimenez@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@cutebit.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220312135722.20770-1-povik+lin@cutebit.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
Particularly for networked workloads, io_uring intensively uses its
poll based backend to get a notification when data/space is available.
Profiling workloads, we see 3-4% of alloc+free that is directly attributed
to just the apoll allocation and free (and the rest being skb alloc+free).
For the fast path, we have ctx->uring_lock held already for both issue
and the inline completions, and we can utilize that to avoid any extra
locking needed to have a basic recycling cache for the apoll entries on
both the alloc and free side.
Double poll still requires an allocation. But those are rare and not
a fast path item.
With the simple cache in place, we see a 3-4% reduction in overhead for
the workload.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
sseu_dev_info is already a pretty large structure which will likely
continue to grow when future platforms increase potential DSS and EU
counts. Let's switch the stack placement of this structure in debugfs
with a dynamic allocation.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315020805.844962-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
|
|
VMware mailing lists in the MAINTAINERS file are private lists meant
for VMware-internal review/notification for patches to the respective
subsystems. Anyone can post to these addresses, but there is no public
read access like open mailing lists, which makes them more like email
aliases instead (to reach out to reviewers).
So update all the VMware mailing list references in the MAINTAINERS
file to mark them as such, using "R: email-alias@vmware.com".
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164574148378.654750.15832494349474144706.stgit@csail.mit.edu
|
|
Zack Rusin will be taking over the maintainership of the VMware
vmmouse driver. Update the MAINTAINERS file to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164574146977.654750.10918397477833459687.stgit@csail.mit.edu
|
|
Deep has decided to transfer the joint-maintainership of paravirt ops
to Srivatsa, and the maintainership of the VMware hypervisor interface
to Srivatsa and Alexey. Update the MAINTAINERS file to reflect this
change, and also add Alexey as a reviewer for paravirt ops.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Deep Shah <sdeep@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164574143710.654750.17342470717937593195.stgit@csail.mit.edu
|
|
On a 32 bit system, the "len * sizeof(*p)" operation can have an
integer overflow.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
|
Clean up the array_size.cocci warnings under tools/testing/selftests/bpf/:
Use `ARRAY_SIZE(arr)` instead of forms like `sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0])`.
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c uses ARRAY_SIZE() defined
in tools/include/linux/kernel.h (sys/sysinfo.h -> linux/kernel.h), while
others use ARRAY_SIZE() in bpf_util.h.
Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220315130143.2403-1-guozhengkui@vivo.com
|
|
When running xdpsock for a fix duration of time before terminating
using --duration=<n>, there is a race condition that may cause xdpsock
to terminate immediately.
When running for a fixed duration of time the check to determine when to
terminate execution is in is_benchmark_done() and is being executed in
the context of the poller thread,
if (opt_duration > 0) {
unsigned long dt = (get_nsecs() - start_time);
if (dt >= opt_duration)
benchmark_done = true;
}
However start_time is only set after the poller thread have been
created. This leaves a small window when the poller thread is starting
and calls is_benchmark_done() for the first time that start_time is not
yet set. In that case start_time have its initial value of 0 and the
duration check fails as it do not correlate correctly for the
applications start time and immediately sets benchmark_done which in
turn terminates the xdpsock application.
Fix this by setting start_time before creating the poller thread.
Fixes: d3f11b018f6c ("samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add duration option to specify how long to run")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220315102948.466436-1-niklas.soderlund@corigine.com
|
|
If tcp_bpf_sendmsg is running during a tear down operation, psock may be
freed.
tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
sk_msg_return()
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir()
unlikely(!psock))
sk_msg_free()
The mem of msg has been uncharged in tcp_bpf_send_verdict() by
sk_msg_return(), and would be uncharged by sk_msg_free() again. When psock
is null, we can simply returning an error code, this would then trigger
the sk_msg_free_nocharge in the error path of __SK_REDIRECT and would have
the side effect of throwing an error up to user space. This would be a
slight change in behavior from user side but would look the same as an
error if the redirect on the socket threw an error.
This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x30/0x350
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-5-wangyufen@huawei.com
|
|
In tcp_bpf_send_verdict(), if msg has more data after
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir():
tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
tosend = msg->sg.size //msg->sg.size = 22220
case __SK_REDIRECT:
sk_msg_return() //uncharged msg->sg.size(22220) sk->sk_forward_alloc
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir() //after tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir, msg->sg.size=11000
goto more_data;
tosend = msg->sg.size //msg->sg.size = 11000
case __SK_REDIRECT:
sk_msg_return() //uncharged msg->sg.size(11000) to sk->sk_forward_alloc
The msg->sg.size(11000) has been uncharged twice, to fix we can charge the
remaining msg->sg.size before goto more data.
This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9860 at net/core/stream.c:208 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xd4/0x1a0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
__tcp_close+0x279/0x470
tcp_close+0x1f/0x60
inet_release+0x3f/0x80
__sock_release+0x3d/0xb0
sock_close+0x11/0x20
__fput+0x92/0x250
task_work_run+0x6a/0xa0
do_exit+0x33b/0xb60
do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0
get_signal+0xb6/0x950
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xac/0x2a0
? vfs_write+0x237/0x290
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xa9/0x200
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x46/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
</TASK>
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2136 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x30/0x350
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-4-wangyufen@huawei.com
|
|
If tcp_bpf_sendmsg() is running while sk msg is full. When sk_msg_alloc()
returns -ENOMEM error, tcp_bpf_sendmsg() goes to wait_for_memory. If partial
memory has been alloced by sk_msg_alloc(), that is, msg_tx->sg.size is
greater than osize after sk_msg_alloc(), memleak occurs. To fix we use
sk_msg_trim() to release the allocated memory, then goto wait for memory.
Other call paths of sk_msg_alloc() have the similar issue, such as
tls_sw_sendmsg(), so handle sk_msg_trim logic inside sk_msg_alloc(),
as Cong Wang suggested.
This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7950 at net/core/stream.c:208 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xd4/0x1a0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
__tcp_close+0x279/0x470
tcp_close+0x1f/0x60
inet_release+0x3f/0x80
__sock_release+0x3d/0xb0
sock_close+0x11/0x20
__fput+0x92/0x250
task_work_run+0x6a/0xa0
do_exit+0x33b/0xb60
do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0
get_signal+0xb6/0x950
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xac/0x2a0
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xa9/0x200
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x46/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
</TASK>
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2094 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:155 inet_sock_destruct+0x13c/0x260
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-3-wangyufen@huawei.com
|
|
If tcp_bpf_sendmsg is running during a tear down operation we may enqueue
data on the ingress msg queue while tear down is trying to free it.
sk1 (redirect sk2) sk2
------------------- ---------------
tcp_bpf_sendmsg()
tcp_bpf_send_verdict()
tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir()
bpf_tcp_ingress()
sock_map_close()
lock_sock()
lock_sock() ... blocking
sk_psock_stop
sk_psock_clear_state(psock, SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED);
release_sock(sk);
lock_sock()
sk_mem_charge()
get_page()
sk_psock_queue_msg()
sk_psock_test_state(psock, SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED);
drop_sk_msg()
release_sock()
While drop_sk_msg(), the msg has charged memory form sk by sk_mem_charge
and has sg pages need to put. To fix we use sk_msg_free() and then kfee()
msg.
This issue can cause the following info:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 9202 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xc8/0xe0
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
tcp_rcv_state_process+0xe5f/0xe90
? sk_filter_trim_cap+0x10d/0x230
? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x161/0x250
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x161/0x250
tcp_v4_rcv+0xc3a/0xce0
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x3d/0x230
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x54/0x60
ip_local_deliver+0xfd/0x110
? ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x230/0x230
ip_rcv+0xd6/0x100
? ip_local_deliver+0x110/0x110
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x85/0xa0
process_backlog+0xa4/0x160
__napi_poll+0x29/0x1b0
net_rx_action+0x287/0x300
__do_softirq+0xff/0x2fc
do_softirq+0x79/0x90
</IRQ>
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 531 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct+0x175/0x1b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x24/0x1f0
sk_psock_destroy+0x19b/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x1b3/0x3c0
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
worker_thread+0x30/0x350
? process_one_work+0x3c0/0x3c0
kthread+0xe6/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: 9635720b7c88 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix memleak on ingress msg enqueue")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304081145.2037182-2-wangyufen@huawei.com
|
|
If a error happens and sink_not_reliable is set, PSR should be disabled
for good but that is not happening.
It would be disabled by the function handling the PSR error but then
on the next fastset it would be enabled again in
_intel_psr_post_plane_update().
It would only be disabled for good in the next modeset where has_psr
will be set false.
v2:
- release psr lock before continue
Fixes: 9ce5884e5139 ("drm/i915/display: Only keep PSR enabled if there is active planes")
Reported-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Reported-by: Charlton Lin <charlton.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-2-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Commit 13ea6db2cf24 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel
powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is
usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is
some error or status that source needs to handle.
When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux
transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power()
is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored.
So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux
lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit
being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended.
v2:
- renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd()
- fixed indentation
Fixes: 13ea6db2cf24 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off")
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|