aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-04-03ARM: 7685/1: delay: use private ticks_per_jiffy field for timer-based delay opsWill Deacon1-1/+1
Commit 70264367a243 ("ARM: 7653/2: do not scale loops_per_jiffy when using a constant delay clock") fixed a problem with our timer-based delay loop, where loops_per_jiffy is scaled by cpufreq yet used directly by the timer delay ops. This patch fixes the problem in a more elegant way by keeping a private ticks_per_jiffy field in the delay ops, independent of loops_per_jiffy and therefore not subject to scaling. The loop-based delay continues to use loops_per_jiffy directly, as it should. Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2013-02-21ARM: 7653/2: do not scale loops_per_jiffy when using a constant delay clockNicolas Pitre1-0/+1
When udelay() is implemented using an architected timer, it is wrong to scale loops_per_jiffy when changing the CPU clock frequency since the timer clock remains constant. The lpj should probably become an implementation detail relevant to the CPU loop based delay routine only and more confined to it. In the mean time this is the minimal fix needed to have expected delays with the timer based implementation when cpufreq is also in use. Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Tested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-09-26ARM: 7538/1: delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sourcesJonathan Austin1-0/+9
The current timer-based delay loop relies on the architected timer to initiate the switch away from the polling-based implementation. This is unfortunate for platforms without the architected timers but with a suitable delay source (that is, constant frequency, always powered-up and ticking as long as the CPUs are online). This patch introduces a registration mechanism for the delay timer (which provides an unconditional read_current_timer implementation) and updates the architected timer code to use the new interface. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-07-09ARM: 7452/1: delay: allow timer-based delay implementation to be selectedWill Deacon1-7/+25
This patch allows a timer-based delay implementation to be selected by switching the delay routines over to use get_cycles, which is implemented in terms of read_current_timer. This further allows us to skip the loop calibration and have a consistent delay function in the face of core frequency scaling. To avoid the pain of dealing with memory-mapped counters, this implementation uses the co-processor interface to the architected timers when they are available. The previous loop-based implementation is kept around for CPUs without the architected timers and we retain both the maximum delay (2ms) and the corresponding conversion factors for determining the number of loops required for a given interval. Since the indirection of the timer routines will only work when called from C, the sa1100 sleep routines are modified to branch to the loop-based delay functions directly. Tested-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-02[ARM] move include/asm-arm to arch/arm/include/asmRussell King1-0/+44
Move platform independent header files to arch/arm/include/asm, leaving those in asm/arch* and asm/plat* alone. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>