aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_slowclock.S (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-02-03ARM: at91: code removal of CAP9 SoCJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD1-8/+4
Following removal announce and addition to feature-removal-schedule.txt, here is the actual source code deletion for Atmel CAP9 family. Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
2012-01-20ARM: at91: merge at91cap9_ddrsdr.h in at91sam9_ddrsdr.hJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD1-3/+2
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
2010-10-26AT91: pm: make sure that r0 is 0 when dealing with cache operationsNicolas Ferre1-0/+1
When using CP15 cache operations (c7), we make sure that Rd (r0) is actually 0 as ARM 926 TRM is saying. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
2010-07-09ARM: 6185/1: AT91: PM: dual ram controller supportNicolas Ferre1-20/+54
This rework allows to address tow memory controllers. AT91SAM9263 and AT91SAM9G45 family have tow SDRAM or DDR/SDRAM controllers. Power management should take care of this. This patch modify the way RAM IP header files are implemented to allow access to registers of both controllers ; it also adds some macros. We also modify the power management files to use those modified header files. Slow clock (assembly) and regular power management functions are synchronized for setting of RAM self-refresh procedure: (lpr & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB) | AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH Note that AT91RM9200 is not impacted by this modification. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-04-14ARM: 5975/1: AT91 slow-clock suspend: don't wait when turning PLLs offAnders Larsen1-4/+0
From: Julien Langer <julien.langer@gmail.com> AT91: when turning off the PLLs during suspend, don't wait for the lock flag to be set. Previously the code would always run into the loop limitation of 1000 iterations because the flag is never set when turning the PLLs off. Comments from Anders Larsen: (in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127058929724193&w=2) Signed-off-by: Julien Langer <julien.langer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net> Acked-by: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-04-09ARM: 6043/1: AT91 slow-clock resume: Don't wait for a disabled PLL to lockAnders Larsen1-0/+12
at91 slow-clock resume: Don't wait for a disabled PLL to lock. We run into this problem with the PLLB on the at91: ohci-at91 disables the PLLB when going to suspend. The slowclock code however tries to do the same: It saves the PLLB register value and when restoring the value during resume, it waits for the PLLB to lock again. However the PLL will never lock and the loop would run into its timeout because the slowclock code just stored and restored an empty register. This fixes the problem by only restoring PLLA/PLLB when they were enabled at suspend time. Cc: Andrew Victor <avictor.za@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-09-21[ARM] 5264/2: [AT91] Suspend-to-RAM disables main oscillatorAndrew Victor1-0/+283
This patch adds support for a low(er)-power suspend-to-RAM. In addition to the SDRAM being put into self-refresh mode, the Master Clock is set to the Slow-clock rate (32Khz) and PLLA & PLLB are disabled. Certain peripherals are therefore also disabled, and thus cannot be used as wakeup sources. This patch has been included in the AT91 patches in various forms since 2.6.19 and a number of people have worked or commented on it, most notably: Savin Zlobec (for the original AT91RM9200 support) Anti Sullin (for the SAM9260 version) David Brownell, etc. Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>