| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Without the command register, ON/ONLP/RET/OFF voltages are
useless. and TWL will be unable to use these
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
|
|
According to latest OMAP4430 Data Manual v0.4 dated March 2011:
- Retention voltage shall be set to 0.83V. See tables 2.2, 2.4 and 2.6 in DM.
This allows saving a little more power in retention states.
- OPP100 IVA nominal voltage is 1.188V. See table 2.4 in DM.
This allows saving a little power when CPU wakes up until Smart-Reflex is
not yet resumed.
[nm@ti.com: ported to voltdm_c]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Titiano <p-titiano@ti.com>
|
|
0V conversions should be mapped to 0 as it is meant to denote
off voltages.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
|
|
using 1.35V as a check is not correct, we know that beyond 0x39,
voltages are non linear - hence use the conversion iff uV greater
than that for 0x39. For example, with 709mV as the smps offset,
the max linear is actually 1.41V(0x39vsel)!
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
|
|
omap_twl_vsel_to_uv() and omap_twl_uv_to_vsel() functions used to convert
voltages to TWL6030 SMPS commands (a.k.a "vsel") implement incorrect conversion
formula.
It uses legacy OMAP3 formula, but OMAP4 Power IC has different offset and
voltage step:
- Voltage Step is now 12.66mV (instead of 12.5mV)
- Offset is either 607.7mV or 709mV depending on TWL6030 chip revision
(instead of 600mV)
This leads to setting voltages potentially higher than expected, and so
potentially some (limited) power overconsumption.
For reference, see formula and tables in section 8.5.2.3
"Output Voltage Selection (Standard Mode / Extended Mode with or without offset)"
in TWL6030 functional specifications document.
[nm@ti.com: ported to voltdm_c]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Titiano <p-titiano@ti.com>
|
|
Remove hard-coded I2C configuration in favor of settings that can be
configured from PMIC-specific values. Currently only high-speed mode
and the master-code value are supported, since they were the only
fields currently used, but extending this is now trivial.
Thanks to Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> for reporting/fixing a sparse
problem and making omap_vc_i2c_init() static, as well as finding and
fixing a problem with the shift/mask of mcode.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
Move structure containing PMIC configurable settings into struct
voltagedomain. In the process, rename from omap_volt_pmic_info to
omap_voltdm_pmic (_info suffix is not helpful.)
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
The VC layer can support PMICs with separate voltage and command
registers by putting the different registers in the PRM_VC_SMPS_VOL_RA
and PRCM_VC_SMPS_CMD_RA registers respectively.
The PMIC data must supply at least a voltage register address
(volt_reg_addr). The command register address (cmd_reg_addr) is
optional. If the PMIC data does not supply a separate command
register address, the VC will use the voltage register address for both.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
This voltage domain (a.k.a. VDD1) contains both the MPU and the IVA, so
rename appropriately.
Also fixup any users of the "mpu" name to use "mpu_iva"
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
Start cleaning up the voltage layer to have a voltage domain layer
that resembles the structure of the existing clock and power domain
layers. To that end:
- move the 'struct voltagedomain' out of 'struct omap_vdd_info' to
become the primary data structure.
- convert any functions taking a pointer to struct omap_vdd_info into
functions taking a struct voltagedomain pointer.
- convert the register & initialize of voltage domains to look like
that of powerdomains
- convert omap_voltage_domain_lookup() to voltdm_lookup(), modeled
after the current powerdomain and clockdomain lookup functions.
- omap_voltage_late_init(): only configure VDD info when
the vdd_info struct is non-NULL
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
|
|
Conflicts:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
|
|
Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
At this point in time, there's no reason for this header file to be in
plat-omap/include/plat/voltage.h. It should not be included by device
drivers, and the code that uses it is currently all under mach-omap2/.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
|
|
twl_init functions are declared in pm.h and used in pm.c
pm.h header defining the protos need to be included to
ensure that omap_twl.c has consistent function definition.
This fixes sparse warning:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c:237:12: warning: symbol 'omap4_twl_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c:256:12: warning: symbol 'omap3_twl_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
The uv_to_vsel, vsel_to_uv functions don't need to be exposed to the
world as they are used as function pointers. make them static.
Fixes sparse warnings:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c:63:15: warning: symbol 'twl4030_vsel_to_uv' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c:68:4: warning: symbol 'twl4030_uv_to_vsel' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c:73:15: warning: symbol 'twl6030_vsel_to_uv' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_twl.c:105:4: warning: symbol 'twl6030_uv_to_vsel' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
TWL6030 is the power IC used along with OMAP4 in OMAP4 SDPs,
blaze boards and panda boards. This patch registers the OMAP4
PMIC specific information with the voltage layer.
This also involves implementing a different formula for
voltage to vsel and vsel to voltage calculations from
TWL4030.
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
|
This patch registers the TWL4030 PMIC specific informtion
with the voltage driver. Failing this patch the voltage driver
is unware of the formula to use for vsel to voltage and vice versa
conversion and lot of other PMIC dependent parameters.
This file is based on the arch/arm/plat-omap opp_twl_tpl.c file
by Paul Walmsley. The original file is replaced by this file.
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
|
Nishanth Menon
Patrick Titiano
Kevin Hilman
Lucas De Marchi
Tony Lindgren
Thara Gopinath
Paul Walmsley