linux-dev - Linux kernel development work

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2011-11-17	ARM: 7159/1: OMAP: Introduce local common.h files	Tony Lindgren	1	-1/+1
	As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, there's no need to keep local prototypes in non-local headers. Add mach-omap1/common.h and mach-omap2/common.h and move the local prototypes there from plat/common.h and mach/omap4-common.h. Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-07-10	OMAP4: prm: Replace warm reset API with the offset based version	Benoit Cousson	1	-0/+19
	The warm reset function was still using the obsolete API. Replace it by the new one and move the file to the proper c file. Change the function names to stick to the file convention as suggested by Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>: prm_xxx -> prminst_xxx Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
2011-07-10	OMAP4: hwmod: Replace RSTCTRL absolute address with offset macros	Benoit Cousson	1	-1/+92
	The RSTCTRL register was accessed using an absolute address. The usage of hardcoded macros to calculate virtual address from physical one should be avoided as much as possible. The usage of an offset will allow future improvement like migration from the current architecture code toward a module driver. Update prm_xxx accessors, move definition to the proper header file and update copyrights. Change the s16 register offset parameter to u16. Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> [paul@pwsan.com: use '_prminst_' in function names that are part of the prminst44xx.c file] Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
2010-12-21	OMAP4: PRCM: add OMAP4-specific accessor/mutator functions	Paul Walmsley	1	-0/+66
	In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem. OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a "local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the OMAP4 PRCM layout. To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst* and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers. To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions. As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least bad approach. Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware variant. While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention of the other OMAP4 PRCM files. Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments. Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>