|
This work adds BPF_XADD for BPF_W/BPF_DW to the arm64 JIT and therefore
completes JITing of all BPF instructions, meaning we can thus also remove
the 'notyet' label and do not need to fall back to the interpreter when
BPF_XADD is used in a program!
This now also brings arm64 JIT in line with x86_64, s390x, ppc64, sparc64,
where all current eBPF features are supported.
BPF_W example from test_bpf:
.u.insns_int = {
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x12),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, R10, -40, 0x10),
BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_W, R10, R0, -40),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R0, R10, -40),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
[...]
00000020: 52800247 mov w7, #0x12 // #18
00000024: 928004eb mov x11, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
00000028: d280020a mov x10, #0x10 // #16
0000002c: b82b6b2a str w10, [x25,x11]
// start of xadd mapping:
00000030: 928004ea mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
00000034: 8b19014a add x10, x10, x25
00000038: f9800151 prfm pstl1strm, [x10]
0000003c: 885f7d4b ldxr w11, [x10]
00000040: 0b07016b add w11, w11, w7
00000044: 880b7d4b stxr w11, w11, [x10]
00000048: 35ffffab cbnz w11, 0x0000003c
// end of xadd mapping:
[...]
BPF_DW example from test_bpf:
.u.insns_int = {
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0x12),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, -40, 0x10),
BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, R10, R0, -40),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R0, R10, -40),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
[...]
00000020: 52800247 mov w7, #0x12 // #18
00000024: 928004eb mov x11, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
00000028: d280020a mov x10, #0x10 // #16
0000002c: f82b6b2a str x10, [x25,x11]
// start of xadd mapping:
00000030: 928004ea mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
00000034: 8b19014a add x10, x10, x25
00000038: f9800151 prfm pstl1strm, [x10]
0000003c: c85f7d4b ldxr x11, [x10]
00000040: 8b07016b add x11, x11, x7
00000044: c80b7d4b stxr w11, x11, [x10]
00000048: 35ffffab cbnz w11, 0x0000003c
// end of xadd mapping:
[...]
Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8, test suite results after the patch:
No JIT: [ 3751.855362] test_bpf: Summary: 311 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/303 JIT'ed]
With JIT: [ 3573.759527] test_bpf: Summary: 311 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [303/303 JIT'ed]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add support for JMP_CALL_X (tail call) introduced by commit 04fd61ab36ec
("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs").
bpf_tail_call() arguments:
ctx - context pointer passed to next program
array - pointer to map which type is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY
index - index inside array that selects specific program to run
In this implementation arm64 JIT jumps into callee program after prologue,
so callee program reuses the same stack. For tail_call_cnt, we use the
callee-saved R26 (which was already saved/restored but previously unused
by JIT).
With this patch a tail call generates the following code on arm64:
if (index >= array->map.max_entries)
goto out;
34: mov x10, #0x10 // #16
38: ldr w10, [x1,x10]
3c: cmp w2, w10
40: b.ge 0x0000000000000074
if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)
goto out;
tail_call_cnt++;
44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32
48: cmp x26, x10
4c: b.gt 0x0000000000000074
50: add x26, x26, #0x1
prog = array->ptrs[index];
if (prog == NULL)
goto out;
54: mov x10, #0x68 // #104
58: ldr x10, [x1,x10]
5c: ldr x11, [x10,x2]
60: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000074
goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size);
64: mov x10, #0x20 // #32
68: ldr x10, [x11,x10]
6c: add x10, x10, #0x20
70: br x10
74:
Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
Daniel Borkmann
Zi Shen Lim
Xi Wang