| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Initalizers for deferrable delayed_work are confused.
* __DEFERRED_WORK_INITIALIZER()
* DECLARE_DEFERRED_WORK()
* INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE()
Rename them to
* __DEFERRABLE_WORK_INITIALIZER()
* DECLARE_DEFERRABLE_WORK()
* INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK()
This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|
|
So that we can clean up the header files and not be relying
on implicit includes from device.h ---> module.h
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
|
|
This allows us to move duplicated code in <asm/atomic.h>
(atomic_inc_not_zero() for now) to <linux/atomic.h>
Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
With cmwq, there's no reason to use a separate workqueue in
cpufreq_spudemand. Use system_wq instead. The work items are already
sync canceled on stop, so it's already guaranteed that no work is
running when spu_gov_exit() is entered.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
This updates the cpufreq drivers in arch/powerpc so they build again
after the core cpufreq changes that broke them in commit
in835481d9bcd65720b473db6b38746a74a3964218.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This patch adds a cpufreq governor that takes the number of running spus
into account. It's very similar to the ondemand governor, but not as complex.
Instead of hacking spu load into the ondemand governor it might be easier to
have cpufreq accepting multiple governors per cpu in future.
Don't know if this is the right way, but it would keep the governors simple.
Signed-off-by: Christian Krafft <krafft@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
|
Tejun Heo
Paul Gortmaker
Arun Sharma
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Christian Krafft