| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
If an architecture does not define the atomic_{cmp,}xchg_*() variants,
the generic implementation defaults them to the fully-ordered version.
riscv's had its own variants since "the beginning", but it never told
(#define-d these for) the generic implementation: it is time to do so.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
|
Currently architectures can override __atomic_op_*() to define the barriers
used before/after a relaxed atomic when used to build acquire/release/fence
variants.
This has the unfortunate property of requiring the architecture to define the
full wrapper for the atomics, rather than just the barriers they care about,
and gets in the way of generating atomics which can be easily read.
Instead, this patch has architectures define an optional set of barriers:
* __atomic_acquire_fence()
* __atomic_release_fence()
* __atomic_pre_full_fence()
* __atomic_post_full_fence()
... which <linux/atomic.h> uses to build the wrappers.
It would be nice if we could undef these, along with the __atomic_op_*()
wrappers, but that would break the cmpxchg() wrappers, which are written
in preprocessor. Undefs would have been nice, but alas.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: aryabinin@virtuozzo.com
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: dvyukov@google.com
Cc: glider@google.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: peter@hurleysoftware.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716113017.3909-7-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Many of the inc/dec ops are mandatory, but for most architectures inc/dec are
simply trivial wrappers around their corresponding add/sub ops.
Let's make all the inc/dec ops optional, so that we can get rid of these
boilerplate wrappers.
The instrumented atomics are updated accordingly.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-17-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Some of the atomics return the result of a test applied after the atomic
operation, and almost all architectures implement these as trivial
wrappers around the underlying atomic. Specifically:
* <atomic>_inc_and_test(v) is (<atomic>_inc_return(v) == 0)
* <atomic>_dec_and_test(v) is (<atomic>_dec_return(v) == 0)
* <atomic>_sub_and_test(i, v) is (<atomic>_sub_return(i, v) == 0)
* <atomic>_add_negative(i, v) is (<atomic>_add_return(i, v) < 0)
Rather than have these definitions duplicated in all architectures, with
minor inconsistencies in formatting and documentation, let's make these
operations optional, with default fallbacks as above. Implementations
must now provide a preprocessor symbol.
The instrumented atomics are updated accordingly.
Both x86 and m68k have custom implementations, which are left as-is,
given preprocessor symbols to avoid being overridden.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-16-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
As a step towards unifying the atomic/atomic64/atomic_long APIs, this
patch converts the arch/riscv implementation of atomic64_add_unless()
into an implementation of atomic64_fetch_add_unless().
A wrapper in <linux/atomic.h> will build atomic_add_unless() atop of
this, provided it is given a preprocessor definition.
No functional change is intended as a result of this patch.
Acked-by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-14-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Several architectures these have a near-identical implementation based
on atomic_read() and atomic_cmpxchg() which we can instead define in
<linux/atomic.h>, so let's do so, using something close to the existing
x86 implementation with try_cmpxchg().
Where an architecture provides its own atomic_fetch_add_unless(), it
must define a preprocessor symbol for it. The instrumented atomics are
updated accordingly.
Note that arch/arc's existing atomic_fetch_add_unless() had redundant
barriers, as these are already present in its atomic_cmpxchg()
implementation.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-7-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
We define a trivial fallback for atomic_inc_not_zero(), but don't do
the same for atomic64_inc_not_zero(), leading most architectures to
define the same boilerplate.
Let's add a fallback in <linux/atomic.h>, and remove the redundant
implementations. Note that atomic64_add_unless() is always defined in
<linux/atomic.h>, and promotes its arguments to the requisite types, so
we need not do this explicitly.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-6-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
When atomic_inc_not_zero(v) isn't defined, <linux/atomic.h> will define
it as falling back to atomic_add_unless((v), 1, 0), so there's no need
for arch code to do so.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-3-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
While __atomic_add_unless() was originally intended as a building-block
for atomic_add_unless(), it's now used in a number of places around the
kernel. It's the only common atomic operation named __atomic*(), rather
than atomic_*(), and for consistency it would be better named
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This lack of consistency is slightly confusing, and gets in the way of
scripting atomics. Given that, let's clean things up and promote it to
an official part of the atomics API, in the form of
atomic_fetch_add_unless().
This patch converts definitions and invocations over to the new name,
including the instrumented version, using the following script:
----
git grep -w __atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__atomic_add_unless\>/atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
git grep -w __arch_atomic_add_unless | while read line; do
sed -i '{s/\<__arch_atomic_add_unless\>/arch_atomic_fetch_add_unless/}' "${line%%:*}";
done
----
Note that we do not have atomic{64,_long}_fetch_add_unless(), which will
be introduced by later patches.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Atomics present the same issue with locking: release and acquire
variants need to be strengthened to meet the constraints defined
by the Linux-kernel memory consistency model [1].
Atomics present a further issue: implementations of atomics such
as atomic_cmpxchg() and atomic_add_unless() rely on LR/SC pairs,
which do not give full-ordering with .aqrl; for example, current
implementations allow the "lr-sc-aqrl-pair-vs-full-barrier" test
below to end up with the state indicated in the "exists" clause.
In order to "synchronize" LKMM and RISC-V's implementation, this
commit strengthens the implementations of the atomics operations
by replacing .rl and .aq with the use of ("lightweigth") fences,
and by replacing .aqrl LR/SC pairs in sequences such as:
0: lr.w.aqrl %0, %addr
bne %0, %old, 1f
...
sc.w.aqrl %1, %new, %addr
bnez %1, 0b
1:
with sequences of the form:
0: lr.w %0, %addr
bne %0, %old, 1f
...
sc.w.rl %1, %new, %addr /* SC-release */
bnez %1, 0b
fence rw, rw /* "full" fence */
1:
following Daniel's suggestion.
These modifications were validated with simulation of the RISC-V
memory consistency model.
C lr-sc-aqrl-pair-vs-full-barrier
{}
P0(int *x, int *y, atomic_t *u)
{
int r0;
int r1;
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(u, 0, 1);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*y);
}
P1(int *x, int *y, atomic_t *v)
{
int r0;
int r1;
WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(v, 0, 1);
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
}
exists (u=1 /\ v=1 /\ 0:r1=0 /\ 1:r1=0)
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151930201102853&w=2
https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/isa-dev/hKywNHBkAXM
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151633436614259&w=2
Suggested-by: Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>
Cc: Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
|
This is another memory model FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
|
Our atomics are generated from a complicated series of preprocessor
macros, each of which is slightly different from the last. When writing
the macros I'd accidentally left some unused arguments floating around.
This patch removes the unused macro arguments.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
|
|
This contains all the code that directly interfaces with the RISC-V
memory model. While this code corforms to the current RISC-V ISA
specifications (user 2.2 and priv 1.10), the memory model is somewhat
underspecified in those documents. There is a working group that hopes
to produce a formal memory model by the end of the year, but my
understanding is that the basic definitions we're relying on here won't
change significantly.
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
|
Andrea Parri
Mark Rutland
Andrea Parri
Palmer Dabbelt
Palmer Dabbelt