aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/s390/net (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-06-01net: filter: get rid of BPF_S_* enumDaniel Borkmann1-85/+78
This patch finally allows us to get rid of the BPF_S_* enum. Currently, the code performs unnecessary encode and decode workarounds in seccomp and filter migration itself when a filter is being attached in order to overcome BPF_S_* encoding which is not used anymore by the new interpreter resp. JIT compilers. Keeping it around would mean that also in future we would need to extend and maintain this enum and related encoders/decoders. We can get rid of all that and save us these operations during filter attaching. Naturally, also JIT compilers need to be updated by this. Before JIT conversion is being done, each compiler checks if A is being loaded at startup to obtain information if it needs to emit instructions to clear A first. Since BPF extensions are a subset of BPF_LD | BPF_{W,H,B} | BPF_ABS variants, case statements for extensions can be removed at that point. To ease and minimalize code changes in the classic JITs, we have introduced bpf_anc_helper(). Tested with test_bpf on x86_64 (JIT, int), s390x (JIT, int), arm (JIT, int), i368 (int), ppc64 (JIT, int); for sparc we unfortunately didn't have access, but changes are analogous to the rest. Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Chema Gonzalez <chemag@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-05-14net: filter: s390: fix JIT address randomizationHeiko Carstens1-1/+1
This is the s390 variant of Alexei's JIT bug fix. (patch description below stolen from Alexei's patch) bpf_alloc_binary() adds 128 bytes of room to JITed program image and rounds it up to the nearest page size. If image size is close to page size (like 4000), it is rounded to two pages: round_up(4000 + 4 + 128) == 8192 then 'hole' is computed as 8192 - (4000 + 4) = 4188 If prandom_u32() % hole selects a number >= PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*header) then kernel will crash during bpf_jit_free(): kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:887! Call Trace: [<ffffffff81037285>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0x135/0x460 [<ffffffff81694cc0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50 [<ffffffff810378ff>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40 [<ffffffffa01a0d8d>] bpf_jit_free_deferred+0x2d/0x60 [<ffffffff8106bf98>] process_one_work+0x1d8/0x6a0 [<ffffffff8106bf38>] ? process_one_work+0x178/0x6a0 [<ffffffff8106c90c>] worker_thread+0x11c/0x370 since bpf_jit_free() does: unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)fp->bpf_func & PAGE_MASK; struct bpf_binary_header *header = (void *)addr; to compute start address of 'bpf_binary_header' and header->pages will pass junk to: set_memory_rw(addr, header->pages); Fix it by making sure that &header->image[prandom_u32() % hole] and &header are in the same page. Fixes: aa2d2c73c21f2 ("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+ Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-04-25s390/bpf,jit: initialize A register if 1st insn is BPF_S_LDX_B_MSHMartin Schwidefsky1-1/+0
The A register needs to be initialized to zero in the prolog if the first instruction of the BPF program is BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH to prevent leaking the content of %r5 to user space. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2014-03-31net: filter: add jited flag to indicate jit compiled filtersDaniel Borkmann1-1/+4
This patch adds a jited flag into sk_filter struct in order to indicate whether a filter is currently jited or not. The size of sk_filter is not being expanded as the 32 bit 'len' member allows upper bits to be reused since a filter can currently only grow as large as BPF_MAXINSNS. Therefore, there's enough room also for other in future needed flags to reuse 'len' field if necessary. The jited flag also allows for having alternative interpreter functions running as currently, we can only detect jit compiled filters by testing fp->bpf_func to not equal the address of sk_run_filter(). Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-03-26net: Rename skb->rxhash to skb->hashTom Herbert1-4/+4
The packet hash can be considered a property of the packet, not just on RX path. This patch changes name of rxhash and l4_rxhash skbuff fields to be hash and l4_hash respectively. This includes changing uses of the field in the code which don't call the access functions. Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-01-17s390/bpf,jit: fix 32 bit divisions, use unsigned divide instructionsHeiko Carstens1-8/+8
The s390 bpf jit compiler emits the signed divide instructions "dr" and "d" for unsigned divisions. This can cause problems: the dividend will be zero extended to a 64 bit value and the divisor is the 32 bit signed value as specified A or X accumulator, even though A and X are supposed to be treated as unsigned values. The divide instrunctions will generate an exception if the result cannot be expressed with a 32 bit signed value. This is the case if e.g. the dividend is 0xffffffff and the divisor either 1 or also 0xffffffff (signed: -1). To avoid all these issues simply use unsigned divide instructions. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-01-15bpf: do not use reciprocal divideEric Dumazet1-5/+12
At first Jakub Zawadzki noticed that some divisions by reciprocal_divide were not correct. (off by one in some cases) http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/reciprocal-buggy.c He could also show this with BPF: http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/set-and-dump-filter-k-bug.c The reciprocal divide in linux kernel is not generic enough, lets remove its use in BPF, as it is not worth the pain with current cpus. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@darkjames.pl> Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dxchgb@gmail.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-10-24s390/bpf,jit: fix prolog oddityMartin Schwidefsky1-2/+2
The prolog of functions generated by the bpf jit compiler uses an instruction sequence with an "ahi" instruction to create stack space instead of using an "aghi" instruction. Using the 32-bit "ahi" is not wrong as the stack we are operating on is an order-4 allocation which is always aligned to 16KB. But it is more consistent to use an "aghi" as the stack pointer is a 64-bit value. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-10-24s390/dis: move disassembler function prototypes to proper header fileHeiko Carstens1-1/+1
Now that the in-kernel disassembler has an own header file move the disassembler related function prototypes to that header file. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-10-07net: fix unsafe set_memory_rw from softirqAlexei Starovoitov1-1/+3
on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1 sudo tcpdump -i eth1 'tcp port 22' causes the warning: [ 56.766097] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 56.766097] [ 56.780146] CPU0 [ 56.786807] ---- [ 56.793188] lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock); [ 56.799593] <Interrupt> [ 56.805889] lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock); [ 56.812266] [ 56.812266] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 56.812266] [ 56.830670] 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/13: [ 56.836838] #0: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8118f44c>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380 [ 56.849757] [ 56.849757] stack backtrace: [ 56.862194] CPU: 1 PID: 13 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #45 [ 56.868721] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012 [ 56.882004] ffffffff821944c0 ffff88080bbdb8c8 ffffffff8175a145 0000000000000007 [ 56.895630] ffff88080bbd5f40 ffff88080bbdb928 ffffffff81755b14 0000000000000001 [ 56.909313] ffff880800000001 ffff880800000000 ffffffff8101178f 0000000000000001 [ 56.923006] Call Trace: [ 56.929532] [<ffffffff8175a145>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76 [ 56.936067] [<ffffffff81755b14>] print_usage_bug+0x1f7/0x208 [ 56.942445] [<ffffffff8101178f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50 [ 56.948932] [<ffffffff810cc0a0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x150/0x150 [ 56.955470] [<ffffffff810ccb52>] mark_lock+0x282/0x2c0 [ 56.961945] [<ffffffff810ccfed>] __lock_acquire+0x45d/0x1d50 [ 56.968474] [<ffffffff810cce6e>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2de/0x1d50 [ 56.975140] [<ffffffff81393bf5>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x55/0x90 [ 56.981942] [<ffffffff810cef72>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1d0 [ 56.988745] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380 [ 56.995619] [<ffffffff817628f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 [ 57.002493] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380 [ 57.009447] [<ffffffff8118f52a>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380 [ 57.016477] [<ffffffff8118f44c>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380 [ 57.023607] [<ffffffff810436b0>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0xc0/0x460 [ 57.030818] [<ffffffff810cfb8d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 57.037896] [<ffffffff811a8330>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb0/0x2b0 [ 57.044789] [<ffffffff811b59c3>] ? free_object_rcu+0x93/0xa0 [ 57.051720] [<ffffffff81043d9f>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40 [ 57.058727] [<ffffffff8104e17c>] bpf_jit_free+0x2c/0x40 [ 57.065577] [<ffffffff81642cba>] sk_filter_release_rcu+0x1a/0x30 [ 57.072338] [<ffffffff811108e2>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x202/0x7c0 [ 57.078962] [<ffffffff81057f17>] __do_softirq+0xf7/0x3f0 [ 57.085373] [<ffffffff81058245>] run_ksoftirqd+0x35/0x70 cannot reuse jited filter memory, since it's readonly, so use original bpf insns memory to hold work_struct defer kfree of sk_filter until jit completed freeing tested on x86_64 and i386 Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-09-04s390/bpf,jit: fix address randomizationHeiko Carstens1-1/+1
Add misssing braces to hole calculation. This resulted in an addition instead of an substraction. Which in turn means that the jit compiler could try to write out of bounds of the allocated piece of memory. This bug was introduced with aa2d2c73 "s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code". Fixes this one: [ 37.320956] Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 000003ff80231000 [ 37.320984] Oops: 0011 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 37.320993] Modules linked in: dm_multipath scsi_dh eadm_sch dm_mod ctcm fsm autofs4 [ 37.321007] CPU: 28 PID: 6443 Comm: multipathd Not tainted 3.10.9-61.x.20130829-s390xdefault #1 [ 37.321011] task: 0000004ada778000 ti: 0000004ae3304000 task.ti: 0000004ae3304000 [ 37.321014] Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 000000000012d1de (bpf_jit_compile+0x198e/0x23d0) [ 37.321022] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: 000000004350207d 0000004a00000001 0000000000000007 000003ff80231002 [ 37.321029] 0000000000000007 000003ff80230ffe 00000000a7740000 000003ff80230f76 [ 37.321032] 000003ffffffffff 000003ff00000000 000003ff0000007d 000000000071e820 [ 37.321035] 0000004adbe99950 000000000071ea18 0000004af3d9e7c0 0000004ae3307b80 [ 37.321046] Krnl Code: 000000000012d1d0: 41305004 la %r3,4(%r5) 000000000012d1d4: e330f0f80021 clg %r3,248(%r15) #000000000012d1da: a7240009 brc 2,12d1ec >000000000012d1de: 50805000 st %r8,0(%r5) 000000000012d1e2: e330f0f00004 lg %r3,240(%r15) 000000000012d1e8: 41303004 la %r3,4(%r3) 000000000012d1ec: e380f0e00004 lg %r8,224(%r15) 000000000012d1f2: e330f0f00024 stg %r3,240(%r15) [ 37.321074] Call Trace: [ 37.321077] ([<000000000012da78>] bpf_jit_compile+0x2228/0x23d0) [ 37.321083] [<00000000006007c2>] sk_attach_filter+0xfe/0x214 [ 37.321090] [<00000000005d2d92>] sock_setsockopt+0x926/0xbdc [ 37.321097] [<00000000005cbfb6>] SyS_setsockopt+0x8a/0xe8 [ 37.321101] [<00000000005ccaa8>] SyS_socketcall+0x264/0x364 [ 37.321106] [<0000000000713f1c>] sysc_nr_ok+0x22/0x28 [ 37.321113] [<000003fffce10ea8>] 0x3fffce10ea8 [ 37.321118] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 37.321121] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 37.321124] [<000000000012d192>] bpf_jit_compile+0x1942/0x23d0 [ 37.321132] [ 37.321135] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.11 Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2013-07-18s390/bpf,jit: add pkt_type supportHeiko Carstens1-0/+42
s390 version of 3b58908a "x86: bpf_jit_comp: add pkt_type support". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2013-07-18s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit codeHeiko Carstens1-5/+46
This is the s390 variant of 314beb9b "x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit against spraying attacks". With this change the whole jit code and literal pool will be write protected after creation. In addition the start address of the jit code won't be always on a page boundary anymore. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-07-18s390/bpf,jit: use generic jit dumperHeiko Carstens1-8/+2
This is the s390 backend of 79617801 "filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-07-18s390/bpf,jit: call module_free() from any contextHeiko Carstens1-17/+3
The workqueue workaround is no longer needed. Same as 5199dfe531 "sparc: bpf_jit_comp: can call module_free() from any context". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-04-17s390/bpf,jit: use kcalloc instead of kmalloc and memsetStelian Nirlu1-2/+1
Signed-off-by: Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-02-14s390/bpf,jit: add vlan tag supportHeiko Carstens1-0/+21
s390 version of 855ddb56 "x86: bpf_jit_comp: add vlan tag support". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-12-03s390/bpf,jit: add support for XOR instructionHeiko Carstens1-0/+7
Add support for XOR instruction for use with X/K. s390 JIT support for the new BPF_S_ALU_XOR_* instructions introduced with 9e49e889 "filter: add XOR instruction for use with X/K". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-12-03s390/bpf,jit: add support MOD instructionHeiko Carstens1-0/+21
Add support for MOD operation for s390's JIT. Same as 280050cc "x86 bpf_jit: support MOD operation" for x86 which adds JIT support for the generic new MOD operation introduced with b6069a9570 "filter: add MOD operation". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-09-26s390/bpf,jit: add support for BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instructionHeiko Carstens1-0/+5
Add support for new BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instruction which got added with ffe06c17 "filter: add XOR operation". s390 version of 4bfaddf1 "x86 bpf_jit: support BPF_S_ANC_ALU_XOR_X instruction". Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-09-26s390/bpf,jit: improve code generationHeiko Carstens1-4/+37
Make use of new immediate instructions that came with the extended immediate and general instruction extension facilities. Reviewed-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-09-26s390/bpf,jit: BPF Just In Time compiler for s390Martin Schwidefsky3-0/+872
The s390 implementation of the JIT compiler for packet filter speedup. Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>