aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_common.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-05-22sparc/PCI: Use dev_printk() when possibleBjorn Helgaas1-6/+6
Use the pci_info() and pci_err() wrappers for dev_printk() when possible. Log PCI device vendor and device IDs and BAR information in the same format used by other architectures. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2018-04-16sparc/PCI: Request legacy VGA framebuffer only for VGA devicesBjorn Helgaas1-19/+0
Previously we unconditionally requested the legacy VGA framebuffer (bus address 0xa0000-0xbffff) before we even know what PCI devices are present, in these paths: pci_fire_pbm_init, schizo_pbm_init, pci_sun4v_pbm_init, psycho_pbm_init_common pci_determine_mem_io_space pci_register_legacy_regions p->start = mem_res->start + 0xa0000 request_resource(mem_res, p) # claim VGA framebuffer pci_scan_one_pbm pci_of_scan_bus # scan DT for PCI devices pci_claim_bus_resources # claim PCI device BARs If we found a PCI device with a BAR or bridge window that overlapped the framebuffer area, we complained about not being able to claim the BAR, e.g., pci 0000:00:01.0: can't claim BAR 8 [mem 0x1ff00000000-0x1ffbfffffff]: address conflict with Video RAM area [??? 0x1ff000a0000-0x1ff000bffff flags 0x80000000] pci 0000:02:01.0: can't claim BAR 8 [mem 0x1ff00100000-0x1ff028fffff]: no compatible bridge window pci 0000:03:0f.0: can't claim BAR 8 [mem 0x1ff00100000-0x1ff028fffff]: no compatible bridge window pci 0000:04:04.0: can't claim BAR 1 [mem 0x1ff02808000-0x1ff02808fff]: no compatible bridge window This may make the conflicting device unusable because we try not to enable devices that have unassigned or conflicting BARs, e.g., qla1280 0000:04:04.0: can't ioremap BAR 1: [mem size 0x00001000] qla1280: Unable to map I/O memory If there is no VGA device in the same PCI segment, there's no reason to reserve the framebuffer and there's no conflict. If there *is* a VGA device in the same segment, both the VGA device and the device with an overlapping BAR may respond to the framebuffer addresses, which may cause bus errors. Request the legacy framebuffer area only when we actually find a VGA device. The fact that VGA devices use the legacy framebuffer even though it's not reported in a BAR is not sparc-specific, so the reservation of that area could be made more generic in the PCI core eventually. Note that on some systems, e.g., Blade 100, we still report a conflict between an ISA bridge (00:07.0) and a VGA device (00:13.0): pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x1ff00000000-0x1ffffffffff] (bus address [0x00000000-0xffffffff]) pci 0000:00:07.0: reg 0x14: [mem 0x1ff00000000-0x1ff000fffff] pci 0000:00:13.0: can't claim VGA legacy [mem 0x1ff000a0000-0x1ff000bffff]: address conflict with 0000:00:07.0 [mem 0x1ff00000000-0x1ff000fffff] This is probably harmless, but if the VGA device and something behind the ISA bridge both responded to reads of the framebuffer, it would cause a bus error. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LRH.2.21.1804112323170.25495@math.ut.ee Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117191#c35 Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2018-03-20sparc/PCI: Stop reserving System ROM and Video ROM in PCI spaceBjorn Helgaas1-20/+0
Previously, pci_register_legacy_regions() reserved PCI address space under every PCI host bridge for the System ROM and the Video ROM, but these regions are not part of PCI address space. Previously, pci_register_legacy_regions() reserved the following areas of PCI address space under every PCI host bridge: [bus 0xa0000-0xbffff] Video RAM area (VGA frame buffer) [bus 0xc0000-0xc7fff] Video ROM [bus 0xf0000-0xfffff] System ROM It does need to reserve the [bus 0xa0000-0xbffff] region (at least if there's a possibility of a VGA device below the bridge) because VGA devices can respond to that even if they don't describe it with a BAR. But the Video ROM and System ROM areas don't seem necessary because they are not areas that legacy PCI devices respond to. They appear to be copied from x86, where they describe areas of system memory that depend on BIOS conventions. On x86, BIOS copies the option ROM of the primary VGA device to RAM at 0xc0000, and the 0xf0000-0xfffff region is reserved for the motherboard BIOS. Neither of these things applies to sparc. Stop reserving the System ROM and Video ROM regions in PCI space. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-02-15sparc/PCI: Support arbitrary host bridge address offsetYinghai Lu1-8/+26
Add support for arbitrary bus address offset. Previously we ignored the child (PCI) address in the "ranges" property and assumed it was always zero. That means every host bridge window mapped to PCI bus address zero, e.g., pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x2000000000000-0x200007fffffff] (bus address [0x00000000-0x7fffffff]) But some systems have host bridge windows with non-zero child addresses, so parse the child address and compute the offset between the parent (CPU) and child (PCI) addresses. This allows windows like these: /pci@305: PCI MEM [mem 0x2000000100000-0x200007effffff] offset 2000000000000 pci_sun4v f02ae7f8: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x2000000100000-0x200007effffff] (bus address [0x00100000-0x7effffff]) [bhelgaas: changelog] Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman1-0/+1
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2015-10-29sparc/PCI: Add mem64 resource parsing for root busYinghai Lu1-2/+15
David reported that a T5-8 sparc system failed to boot with: pci_sun4v f02dbcfc: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x804000000000-0x80400fffffff] (bus address [0x0000-0xfffffff]) pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x800000000000-0x80007effffff] (bus address [0x00000000-0x7effffff]) pci 0000:00:01.0: can't claim BAR 15 [mem 0x100000000-0x4afffffff pref]: no compatible bridge window Note that we don't know about a host bridge aperture that contains BAR 15. OF does report a MEM64 aperture, but before this patch, pci_determine_mem_io_space() ignored it. Add support for host bridge apertures with 64-bit PCI addresses. Also set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for PCI device and bridge resources in PCI 64-bit memory space. Sparc doesn't actually print the device and bridge resources, but after this patch, we should have the equivalent of this: pci_sun4v f02dbcfc: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x804000000000-0x80400fffffff] (bus address [0x0000-0xfffffff]) pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x800000000000-0x80007effffff] (bus address [0x00000000-0x7effffff]) pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x800100000000-0x8007ffffffff] (bus address [0x100000000-0x7ffffffff]) pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [mem 0x800100000000-0x8004afffffff 64bit pref] [bhelgaas: changelog, URL to David's report] Fixes: d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5514391F.2030300@oracle.com Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2014-01-28sparc: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>Paul Gortmaker1-1/+0
None of these files are actually using any __init type directives and hence don't need to include <linux/init.h>. Most are just a left over from __devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to code getting copied from one driver to the next. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-06-07sparc: Remove unnecessary semicolonsJoe Perches1-2/+2
Semicolons are not necessary after switch/while/for/if braces so remove them. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2011-03-16sparc64: Fix build errors with gcc-4.6.0David S. Miller1-4/+7
Most of the warnings emitted (we fail arch/sparc file builds with -Werror) were legitimate but harmless, however one case (n2_pcr_write) was a genuine bug. Based almost entirely upon a patch by Sam Ravnborg. Reported-by: Dennis Gilmore <dennis@ausil.us> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-05-18of: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer.Grant Likely1-4/+5
The following structure elements duplicate the information in 'struct device.of_node' and so are being eliminated. This patch makes all readers of these elements use device.of_node instead. (struct of_device *)->node (struct dev_archdata *)->prom_node (sparc) (struct dev_archdata *)->of_node (powerpc & microblaze) Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
2010-04-12sparc64: Fix memory leak in pci_register_iommu_region().David S. Miller1-3/+8
Found by kmemleak. If request_resource() fails, we leak the struct resource we allocated to represent the IOMMU mapping area. This actually happens on sun4v machines because the IOMEM area is only reported sans the IOMMU region, unlike all previous systems. I'll need to fix that at some point, but for now fix the leak. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-03-18sparc64: Fix crash with /proc/iomemMikulas Patocka1-1/+1
When you compile kernel on Sparc64 with heap memory checking and type "cat /proc/iomem", you get a crash, because pointers in struct resource are uninitialized. Most code fills struct resource with zeros, so I assume that it is responsibility of the caller of request_resource to initialized it, not the responsibility of request_resource functuion. After 2.6.29 is out, there could be a check for uninitialized fields added to request_resource to avoid crashes like this. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2009-01-06sparc64: Use unsigned long long for u64.Sam Ravnborg1-1/+1
Andrew Morton wrote: People keep on doing printk("%llu", some_u64); testing it only on x86_64 and this generates a warning storm on powerpc, sparc64, etc. Because they use `long', not `long long'. Quite a few 64-bit architectures are using `long' for their s64/u64 types. We should convert them all to `long long'. Update types.h so we use unsigned long long for u64 and fix all warnings in sparc64 code. Tested with an allnoconfig, defconfig and allmodconfig builds. This patch introduces additional warnings in several drivers. These will be dealt with in separate patches. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-12-04sparc,sparc64: unify kernel/Sam Ravnborg1-0/+545
o Move all files from sparc64/kernel/ to sparc/kernel - rename as appropriate o Update sparc/Makefile to the changes o Update sparc/kernel/Makefile to include the sparc64 files NOTE: This commit changes link order on sparc64! Link order had to change for either of sparc32 and sparc64. And assuming sparc64 see more testing than sparc32 change link order on sparc64 where issues will be caught faster. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>