aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/sparc/kernel/spiterrs.S (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-03-27arch/sparc: Avoid DCTI CouplesBabu Moger1-0/+1
Avoid un-intended DCTI Couples. Use of DCTI couples is deprecated. Also address the "Programming Note" for optimal performance. Here is the complete text from Oracle SPARC Architecture Specs. 6.3.4.7 DCTI Couples "A delayed control transfer instruction (DCTI) in the delay slot of another DCTI is referred to as a “DCTI couple”. The use of DCTI couples is deprecated in the Oracle SPARC Architecture; no new software should place a DCTI in the delay slot of another DCTI, because on future Oracle SPARC Architecture implementations DCTI couples may execute either slowly or differently than the programmer assumes it will. SPARC V8 and SPARC V9 Compatibility Note The SPARC V8 architecture left behavior undefined for a DCTI couple. The SPARC V9 architecture defined behavior in that case, but as of UltraSPARC Architecture 2005, use of DCTI couples was deprecated. Software should not expect high performance from DCTI couples, and performance of DCTI couples should be expected to decline further in future processors. Programming Note As noted in TABLE 6-5 on page 115, an annulled branch-always (branch-always with a = 1) instruction is not architecturally a DCTI. However, since not all implementations make that distinction, for optimal performance, a DCTI should not be placed in the instruction word immediately following an annulled branch-always instruction (BA,A or BPA,A)." Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-04-27sparc64: Fix bootup regressions on some Kconfig combinations.David S. Miller1-12/+6
The system call tracing bug fix mentioned in the Fixes tag below increased the amount of assembler code in the sequence of assembler files included by head_64.S This caused to total set of code to exceed 0x4000 bytes in size, which overflows the expression in head_64.S that works to place swapper_tsb at address 0x408000. When this is violated, the TSB is not properly aligned, and also the trap table is not aligned properly either. All of this together results in failed boots. So, do two things: 1) Simplify some code by using ba,a instead of ba/nop to get those bytes back. 2) Add a linker script assertion to make sure that if this happens again the build will fail. Fixes: 1a40b95374f6 ("sparc: Fix system call tracing register handling.") Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Reported-by: Joerg Abraham <joerg.abraham@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-12-04sparc,sparc64: unify kernel/Sam Ravnborg1-0/+245
o Move all files from sparc64/kernel/ to sparc/kernel - rename as appropriate o Update sparc/Makefile to the changes o Update sparc/kernel/Makefile to include the sparc64 files NOTE: This commit changes link order on sparc64! Link order had to change for either of sparc32 and sparc64. And assuming sparc64 see more testing than sparc32 change link order on sparc64 where issues will be caught faster. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>