| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Passing atomic=true to skcipher_walk_virt() only makes the later
skcipher_walk_done() calls use atomic memory allocations, not
skcipher_walk_virt() itself. Thus, we have to move it outside of the
preemption-disabled region (kernel_fpu_begin()/kernel_fpu_end()).
(skcipher_walk_virt() only allocates memory for certain layouts of the
input scatterlist, hence why I didn't notice this earlier...)
Reported-by: syzbot+9bf843c33f782d73ae7d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 4af78261870a ("crypto: x86/chacha20 - add XChaCha20 support")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
To improve responsiveness, yield the FPU (temporarily re-enabling
preemption) every 4 KiB encrypted/decrypted, rather than keeping
preemption disabled during the entire encryption/decryption operation.
Alternatively we could do this for every skcipher_walk step, but steps
may be small in some cases, and yielding the FPU is expensive on x86.
Suggested-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
Now that the x86_64 SIMD implementations of ChaCha20 and XChaCha20 have
been refactored to support varying the number of rounds, add support for
XChaCha12. This is identical to XChaCha20 except for the number of
rounds, which is 12 instead of 20. This can be used by Adiantum.
Reviewed-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
|
In preparation for adding XChaCha12 support, rename/refactor the x86_64
SIMD implementations of ChaCha20 to support different numbers of rounds.
Reviewed-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
|
Eric Biggers