| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
AMD boot CPU initialization happens late via ACPI/CPPC which prevents the
Intel parts from being marked __init.
Split out the common code and provide a dedicated interface for the AMD
initialization and mark the Intel specific code and data __init.
The remaining text size is almost cut in half:
text: 2614 -> 1350
init.text: 0 -> 786
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415161206.592465719@linutronix.de
|
|
This code is convoluted and because it can be invoked post init via the
ACPI/CPPC code, all of the initialization functionality is built in instead
of being part of init text and init data.
As a first step create separate calls for the boot and the application
processors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415161206.536733494@linutronix.de
|
|
The init_freq_invariance_cppc code actually doesn't need the SMP
functionality. So setting the CONFIG_SMP as the check condition for
init_freq_invariance_cppc may cause the confusion to misunderstand the
CPPC. And the x86 CPPC file is better space to store the CPPC related
functions, while the init_freq_invariance_cppc is out of smpboot, that
means, the CONFIG_SMP won't be mandatory condition any more. And It's more
clear than before.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject adjustment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The AMD maximum frequency ratio setting function depends on CPPC, so the
x86 CPPC implementation file is better space for this function.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject adjustment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Rename the cppc_msr.c to cppc.c in x86 ACPI, that expects to use this file
to cover more function implementation for ACPI CPPC beside MSR helpers.
Naming as "cppc" is more straightforward as one of the functionalities
under ACPI subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
Thomas Gleixner
Huang Rui