aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_early.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-02-19x86/microcode/intel: Handle truncated microcode images more robustlyQuentin Casasnovas1-0/+4
We do not check the input data bounds containing the microcode before copying a struct microcode_intel_header from it. A specially crafted microcode could cause the kernel to read invalid memory and lead to a denial-of-service. Signed-off-by: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422964824-22056-3-git-send-email-quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com [ Made error message differ from the next one and flipped comparison. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2015-02-19x86/microcode/intel: Guard against stack overflow in the loaderQuentin Casasnovas1-1/+1
mc_saved_tmp is a static array allocated on the stack, we need to make sure mc_saved_count stays within its bounds, otherwise we're overflowing the stack in _save_mc(). A specially crafted microcode header could lead to a kernel crash or potentially kernel execution. Signed-off-by: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422964824-22056-1-git-send-email-quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-12-10x86/microcode/intel: Fish out the stashed microcode for the BSPBorislav Petkov1-14/+12
I'm such a moron! The simple solution of saving the BSP patch for use on resume was too simple (and wrong!), hint: sizeof(struct microcode_intel). What needs to be done instead is to fish out the microcode patch we have stashed previously and apply that on the BSP in case the late loader hasn't been utilized. So do that instead. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141208110820.GB20057@pd.tnic Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-12-06x86, microcode: Reload microcode on resumeBorislav Petkov1-9/+38
Normally, we do reapply microcode on resume. However, in the cases where that microcode comes from the early loader and the late loader hasn't been utilized yet, there's no easy way for us to go and apply the patch applied during boot by the early loader. Thus, reuse the patch stashed by the early loader for the BSP. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-12-06x86, microcode, intel: Drop unused parameterBorislav Petkov1-4/+3
apply_microcode_early() doesn't use mc_saved_data, kill it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-07-24x86, microcode, intel: Fix typosHenrique de Moraes Holschuh1-3/+3
Fix some typos. One of them was in a struct name, fortunately harmless because it happened on a "sizeof(struct foo*)" construction. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406146251-8540-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-07-24x86, microcode, intel: Add missing static declarationsHenrique de Moraes Holschuh1-2/+2
gcc reports that a few declarations are missing. Fix two obvious ones. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406146251-8540-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-01-13x86, microcode: Move to a proper locationBorislav Petkov1-0/+787
We've grown a bunch of microcode loader files all prefixed with "microcode_". They should be under cpu/ because this is strictly CPU-related functionality so do that and drop the prefix since they're in their own directory now which gives that prefix. :) While at it, drop MICROCODE_INTEL_LIB config item and stash the functionality under CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL as it was its only user. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>