aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crypto/asymmetric_keys (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-10-10X.509: Convert some printk calls to pr_develDavid Howells1-3/+3
Some debugging printk() calls should've been converted to pr_devel() calls. Do that now. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-10asymmetric keys: fix printk format warningRandy Dunlap1-1/+1
Fix printk format warning in x509_cert_parser.c: crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c: In function 'x509_note_OID': crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_cert_parser.c:113:3: warning: format '%zu' expects type 'size_t', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' Builds cleanly on i386 and x86_64. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-10MODSIGN: Fix 32-bit overflow in X.509 certificate validity date checkingDavid Howells3-20/+51
The current choice of lifetime for the autogenerated X.509 of 100 years, putting the validTo date in 2112, causes problems on 32-bit systems where a 32-bit time_t wraps in 2106. 64-bit x86_64 systems seem to be unaffected. This can result in something like: Loading module verification certificates X.509: Cert 6e03943da0f3b015ba6ed7f5e0cac4fe48680994 has expired MODSIGN: Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate (-127) Or: X.509: Cert 6e03943da0f3b015ba6ed7f5e0cac4fe48680994 is not yet valid MODSIGN: Problem loading in-kernel X.509 certificate (-129) Instead of turning the dates into time_t values and comparing, turn the system clock and the ASN.1 dates into tm structs and compare those piecemeal instead. Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08X.509: Add a crypto key parser for binary (DER) X.509 certificatesDavid Howells8-0/+832
Add a crypto key parser for binary (DER) encoded X.509 certificates. The certificate is parsed and, if possible, the signature is verified. An X.509 key can be added like this: # keyctl padd crypto bar @s </tmp/x509.cert 15768135 and displayed like this: # cat /proc/keys 00f09a47 I--Q--- 1 perm 39390000 0 0 asymmetri bar: X509.RSA e9fd6d08 [] Note that this only works with binary certificates. PEM encoded certificates are ignored by the parser. Note also that the X.509 key ID is not congruent with the PGP key ID, but for the moment, they will match. If a NULL or "" name is given to add_key(), then the parser will generate a key description from the CertificateSerialNumber and Name fields of the TBSCertificate: 00aefc4e I--Q--- 1 perm 39390000 0 0 asymmetri bfbc0cd76d050ea4:/C=GB/L=Cambridge/O=Red Hat/CN=kernel key: X509.RSA 0c688c7b [] Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08RSA: Fix signature verification for shorter signaturesDavid Howells1-3/+11
gpg can produce a signature file where length of signature is less than the modulus size because the amount of space an MPI takes up is kept as low as possible by discarding leading zeros. This regularly happens for several modules during the build. Fix it by relaxing check in RSA verification code. Thanks to Tomas Mraz and Miloslav Trmac for help. Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08RSA: Implement signature verification algorithm [PKCS#1 / RFC3447]David Howells4-0/+279
Implement RSA public key cryptography [PKCS#1 / RFC3447]. At this time, only the signature verification algorithm is supported. This uses the asymmetric public key subtype to hold its key data. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08KEYS: Provide signature verification with an asymmetric keyDavid Howells2-1/+50
Provide signature verification using an asymmetric-type key to indicate the public key to be used. The API is a single function that can be found in crypto/public_key.h: int verify_signature(const struct key *key, const struct public_key_signature *sig) The first argument is the appropriate key to be used and the second argument is the parsed signature data: struct public_key_signature { u8 *digest; u16 digest_size; enum pkey_hash_algo pkey_hash_algo : 8; union { MPI mpi[2]; struct { MPI s; /* m^d mod n */ } rsa; struct { MPI r; MPI s; } dsa; }; }; This should be filled in prior to calling the function. The hash algorithm should already have been called and the hash finalised and the output should be in a buffer pointed to by the 'digest' member. Any extra data to be added to the hash by the hash format (eg. PGP) should have been added by the caller prior to finalising the hash. It is assumed that the signature is made up of a number of MPI values. If an algorithm becomes available for which this is not the case, the above structure will have to change. It is also assumed that it will have been checked that the signature algorithm matches the key algorithm. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08KEYS: Asymmetric public-key algorithm crypto key subtypeDavid Howells4-0/+146
Add a subtype for supporting asymmetric public-key encryption algorithms such as DSA (FIPS-186) and RSA (PKCS#1 / RFC1337). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08KEYS: Asymmetric key pluggable data parsersDavid Howells1-1/+119
The instantiation data passed to the asymmetric key type are expected to be formatted in some way, and there are several possible standard ways to format the data. The two obvious standards are OpenPGP keys and X.509 certificates. The latter is especially useful when dealing with UEFI, and the former might be useful when dealing with, say, eCryptfs. Further, it might be desirable to provide formatted blobs that indicate hardware is to be accessed to retrieve the keys or that the keys live unretrievably in a hardware store, but that the keys can be used by means of the hardware. From userspace, the keys can be loaded using the keyctl command, for example, an X.509 binary certificate: keyctl padd asymmetric foo @s <dhowells.pem or a PGP key: keyctl padd asymmetric bar @s <dhowells.pub or a pointer into the contents of the TPM: keyctl add asymmetric zebra "TPM:04982390582905f8" @s Inside the kernel, pluggable parsers register themselves and then get to examine the payload data to see if they can handle it. If they can, they get to: (1) Propose a name for the key, to be used it the name is "" or NULL. (2) Specify the key subtype. (3) Provide the data for the subtype. The key type asks the parser to do its stuff before a key is allocated and thus before the name is set. If successful, the parser stores the suggested data into the key_preparsed_payload struct, which will be either used (if the key is successfully created and instantiated or updated) or discarded. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-10-08KEYS: Implement asymmetric key typeDavid Howells4-0/+191
Create a key type that can be used to represent an asymmetric key type for use in appropriate cryptographic operations, such as encryption, decryption, signature generation and signature verification. The key type is "asymmetric" and can provide access to a variety of cryptographic algorithms. Possibly, this would be better as "public_key" - but that has the disadvantage that "public key" is an overloaded term. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>