aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-02-21ACPI / processor: use acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded versionJiang Liu1-11/+3
Use public function acpi_evaluate_ost() to replace open-coded version of evaluating ACPI _OST method. Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-12-07ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header filesLv Zheng1-5/+2
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-30ACPI / processor: Do not request ACPI cpufreq module directlyRafael J. Wysocki1-22/+0
Function acpi_processor_load_module() used by the ACPI processor driver can only really work if the acpi-cpufreq module is available when acpi_processor_start() is executed which usually is not the case for systems loading the processor driver module from an initramfs. Moreover, that used to be a hackish workaround for module autoloading issues, but udev loads acpi-cpufreq just fine nowadays, so that function isn't really necessary any more. For this reason, drop acpi_processor_load_module() entirely. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-07-15ACPI: introduce helper function acpi_has_method()Jiang Liu1-15/+7
Introduce helper function acpi_has_method() and use it in a number of places to simplify code. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-25ACPI / processor: Drop unused variable from processor_perflib.cLan Tianyu1-3/+1
The count variable in acpi_processor_preregister_performance() is only initalized as 1 for one CPU and incremented when another CPU sharing the same dependency domain is found. It isn't referenced anywhere else, so drop it. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-03-06acpi: Export the acpi_processor_get_performance_infoKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk1-2/+2
The git commit d5aaffa9dd531c978c6f3fea06a2972653bd7fc8 (cpufreq: handle cpufreq being disabled for all exported function) tightens the cpufreq API by returning errors when disable_cpufreq() had been called. The problem we are hitting is that the module xen-acpi-processor which uses the ACPI's functions: acpi_processor_register_performance, acpi_processor_preregister_performance, and acpi_processor_notify_smm fails at acpi_processor_register_performance with -22. Note that earlier during bootup in arch/x86/xen/setup.c there is also an call to cpufreq's API: disable_cpufreq(). This is b/c we want the Linux kernel to parse the ACPI data, but leave the cpufreq decisions to the hypervisor. In v3.9 all the checks that d5aaffa9dd531c978c6f3fea06a2972653bd7fc8 added are now hit and the calls to cpufreq_register_notifier will now fail. This means that acpi_processor_ppc_init ends up printing: "Warning: Processor Platform Limit not supported" and the acpi_processor_ppc_status is not set. The repercussions of that is that the call to acpi_processor_register_performance fails right away at: if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED)) and we don't progress any further on parsing and extracting the _P* objects. The only reason the Xen code called that function was b/c it was exported and the only way to gather the P-states. But we can also just make acpi_processor_get_performance_info be exported and not use acpi_processor_register_performance. This patch does so. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
2013-01-22ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequenciesStefan Bader1-0/+7
To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d "ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures" introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading from AMD specific MSRs. This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass through MSR reads to the HW. Instead the guest gets a 0 in return. And this seems to cause a failure to initialize the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states appear to run at the same frequency). While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen. Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> Cc: 3.7+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-09-09ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figuresMatthew Garrett1-0/+30
Some AMD systems may round the frequencies in ACPI tables to 100MHz boundaries. We can obtain the real frequencies from MSRs, so add a quirk to fix these frequencies up on AMD systems. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-05-08ACPI: Ignore invalid _PSS entries, but use valid onesMarco Aurelio da Costa1-5/+25
The EliteBook 8560W has non-initialized entries in its _PSS ACPI table. Instead of bailing out when the first non-initialized entry is found, ignore it and use only the valid entries. Only bail out if there is no valid entry at all. [v3: Fixes suggested by Konrad] Signed-off-by: Marco Aurelio da Costa <costa@gamic.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-01-26ACPI: Load acpi-cpufreq from processor driver automaticallyAndi Kleen1-0/+22
The only left over hole in automatic cpufreq driver loading was the loading of ACPI cpufreq. This driver should be loaded when ACPI supports a _PDC method and the CPU vendor wants to use acpi cpufreq. Simply add a request module call to the acpi processor core driver when this is true. This seems like the simplest solution for this. Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-05-04[CPUFREQ] use dynamic debug instead of custom infrastructureDominik Brodowski1-5/+1
With dynamic debug having gained the capability to report debug messages also during the boot process, it offers a far superior interface for debug messages than the custom cpufreq infrastructure. As a first step, remove the old cpufreq_debug_printk() function and replace it with a call to the generic pr_debug() function. How can dynamic debug be used on cpufreq? You need a kernel which has CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG enabled. To enabled debugging during runtime, mount debugfs and $ echo -n 'module cpufreq +p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control for debugging the complete "cpufreq" module. To achieve the same goal during boot, append ddebug_query="module cpufreq +p" as a boot parameter to the kernel of your choice. For more detailled instructions, please see Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2010-09-28ACPI: Fix typosLucas De Marchi1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-03-30include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.hTejun Heo1-0/+1
percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-03Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpuLinus Torvalds1-1/+1
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu: percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's left percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to fs percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to core kernel subsystems local_t: Remove leftover local.h this_cpu: Remove pageset_notifier this_cpu: Page allocator conversion percpu, x86: Generic inc / dec percpu instructions local_t: Move local.h include to ringbuffer.c and ring_buffer_benchmark.c module: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters local_t: Remove cpu_local_xx macros percpu: refactor the code in pcpu_[de]populate_chunk() percpu: remove compile warnings caused by __verify_pcpu_ptr() percpu: make accessors check for percpu pointer in sparse percpu: add __percpu for sparse. percpu: make access macros universal percpu: remove per_cpu__ prefix.
2010-02-19ACPI: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0Darrick J. Wong1-1/+5
Earlier, Ingo Molnar posted a patch to make it so that the kernel would avoid reading _PPC on his broken T60. Unfortunately, it seems that with Thomas Renninger's patch last July to eliminate _PPC evaluations when the processor driver loads, the kernel never actually reads _PPC at all! This is problematic if you happen to boot your non-T60 computer in a state where the BIOS _wants_ _PPC to be something other than zero. So, put the _PPC evaluation back into acpi_processor_get_performance_info if ignore_ppc isn't 1. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-02-17percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's leftTejun Heo1-1/+1
Add __percpu sparse annotations to places which didn't make it in one of the previous patches. All converions are trivial. These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be in a different address space and warn if accessed without going through percpu accessors. This patch doesn't affect normal builds. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
2009-12-16Merge branch 'ost' into releaseLen Brown1-3/+47
Conflicts: include/acpi/processor.h Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-11-24[ACPI/CPUFREQ] Introduce bios_limit per cpu cpufreq sysfs interfaceThomas Renninger1-0/+13
This interface is mainly intended (and implemented) for ACPI _PPC BIOS frequency limitations, but other cpufreq drivers can also use it for similar use-cases. Why is this needed: Currently it's not obvious why cpufreq got limited. People see cpufreq/scaling_max_freq reduced, but this could have happened by: - any userspace prog writing to scaling_max_freq - thermal limitations - hardware (_PPC in ACPI case) limitiations Therefore export bios_limit (in kHz) to: - Point the user that it's the BIOS (broken or intended) which limits frequency - Export it as a sysfs interface for userspace progs. While this was a rarely used feature on laptops, there will appear more and more server implemenations providing "Green IT" features like allowing the service processor to limit the frequency. People want to know about HW/BIOS frequency limitations. All ACPI P-state driven cpufreq drivers are covered with this patch: - powernow-k8 - powernow-k7 - acpi-cpufreq Tested with a patched DSDT which limits the first two cores (_PPC returns 1) via _PPC, exposed by bios_limit: # echo 2200000 >cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq # cat cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 2600000 2600000 2200000 2200000 # #scaling_max_freq shows general user/thermal/BIOS limitations # cat cpu*/cpufreq/bios_limit 2600000 2600000 2800000 2800000 # #bios_limit only shows the HW/BIOS limitation CC: Pallipadi Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> CC: davej@codemonkey.org.uk CC: linux@dominikbrodowski.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2009-11-06ACPI: Notify the _PPC evaluation status to the platformZhao Yakui1-3/+47
According to the ACPI spec(section 8.4.4.3) OSPM should convey the _PPC evaluations status to the platform if there exists the _OST object. The _OST contains two arguments: The first is the PERFORMANCE notificatin event. The second is the status of _PPC object. OSPM will convey the _PPC evaluation status to the platform. Of course when the module parameter of "ignore_ppc" is added, OSPM won't evaluate the _PPC object. But it will call the _OST object. At the same time the _OST object will be evaluated only when the PERFORMANCE notification event is received. Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-09-24cpumask: use zalloc_cpumask_var() where possibleLi Zefan1-2/+1
Remove open-coded zalloc_cpumask_var() and zalloc_cpumask_var_node(). Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-08-28ACPI: Move definition of PREFIX from acpi_bus.h to internal..hLen Brown1-0/+2
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ", however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own. Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there. This does not change any actual console output, asside from a whitespace fix. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-05-29ACPI: sanity check _PSS frequency to prevent cpufreq crashLen Brown1-3/+9
When BIOS SETUP is changed to disable EIST, some BIOS hand the OS an un-initialized _PSS: Name (_PSS, Package (0x06) { Package (0x06) { 0x80000000, // frequency [MHz] 0x80000000, // power [mW] 0x80000000, // latency [us] 0x80000000, // BM latency [us] 0x80000000, // control 0x80000000 // status }, ... These are outrageous values for frequency, power and latency, raising the question where to draw the line between legal and illegal. We tend to survive garbage in the power and latency fields, but we can BUG_ON when garbage is in the frequency field. Cpufreq multiplies the frequency by 1000 and stores it in a u32 KHz. So disregard a _PSS with a frequency so large that it can't be represented by cpufreq. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500311 Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-04-05Merge branch 'linus' into releaseLen Brown1-2/+2
Conflicts: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/longhaul.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-03-27ACPI: Avoid wiping out pr->performance during preregisteringStanislaw Gruszka1-25/+21
When cpufreq driver call acpi_processor_preregister_performance() , function will clean up pr->performance even if there is possibly already registered other cpufreq driver. The patch fix this potential problem. It also remove double checks in P domain basic validity code and move these checks to function where _PSD data is captured. Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-02-20alloc_percpu: change percpu_ptr to per_cpu_ptrRusty Russell1-2/+2
Impact: cleanup There are two allocated per-cpu accessor macros with almost identical spelling. The original and far more popular is per_cpu_ptr (44 files), so change over the other 4 files. tj: kill percpu_ptr() and update UP too Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: mingo@redhat.com Cc: lenb@kernel.org Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2009-02-04ACPI: cpufreq: Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/../performance proc entriesThomas Renninger1-105/+0
They were long enough set deprecated... Update Documentation/cpu-freq/users-guide.txt: The deprecated files listed there seen not to exist for some time anymore already. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2009-01-03cpumask: convert shared_cpu_map in acpi_processor* structs to cpumask_var_tRusty Russell1-12/+16
Impact: Reduce memory usage, use new API. This is part of an effort to reduce structure sizes for machines configured with large NR_CPUS. cpumask_t gets replaced by cpumask_var_t, which is either struct cpumask[1] (small NR_CPUS) or struct cpumask * (large NR_CPUS). (Changes to powernow-k* by <travis>.) Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-11-07ACPI: consolidate ACPI_*_COMPONENT definitions in acpi_drivers.hBjorn Helgaas1-1/+1
Move all the component definitions for drivers to a single shared place, include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-25ACPI: cpufreq, processor: fix compile error in drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.cMiao Xie1-0/+5
When trying to build 2.6.28-rc1 on ia64, make aborts with: CC drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.o drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:41:28: error: asm/cpufeature.h: No such file or directory drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c: In function ‘acpi_processor_get_performance_info’: drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: implicit declaration of function ‘boot_cpu_has’ drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: ‘X86_FEATURE_EST’ undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c:364: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 this patch fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'ull' into testLen Brown1-1/+1
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/bay.c drivers/acpi/dock.c drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-22Merge branch 'acpica' into testLen Brown1-5/+5
2008-10-22ACPI: replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printkLin Ming1-5/+5
ACPI_DB_ERROR and ACPI_DB_WARN were removed from ACPICA core. So replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, ...) with printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX ...) and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_WARN, ...) with printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX ...) We do not use ACPI_ERROR/ACPI_WARNING since they're not exported, see ------------------------------------------------------------- commit 6468463abd7051fcc29f3ee7c931f9bbbb26f5a4 Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Date: Mon Jun 26 23:41:38 2006 -0400 ACPI: un-export ACPI_ERROR() -- use printk(KERN_ERR...) Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> ------------------------------------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-10-11ACPI: Change acpi_evaluate_integer to support 64-bit on 32-bit kernelsMatthew Wilcox1-1/+1
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms. Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support 64-bit integers on all platforms. lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long" lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update() Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-09-22ACPI: cpufreq, processor: Detect old BIOS, not supporting CPU freq on a recent CPU.Thomas Renninger1-3/+15
On Intel CPUs it is rather common and a good hint that BIOSes which do provide _PPC func, but not the frequencies itself in _PSS function, are old and need to be updated for CPU freq support. Tell the user/vendor he has a BIOS/firmware problem. Make use of FW_BUG interface to give vendors and users the ability to automatically check with (or let linuxfirmwarekit do that): dmesg |grep "Firmware Bug" Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-08-18ACPI: Fix now signed module parameter.Milan Broz1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-08-15ACPI: Fix thermal shutdownsMilan Broz1-1/+1
Do not use unsigned int if there is test for negative number... See drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c static unsigned int ignore_ppc = -1; ... if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) { ignore_ppc = 0; ... Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-07-30acpi cpufreq cleanup: move bailing out of function before locking the mutexThomas Renninger1-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-30cpufreq acpi: only call _PPC after cpufreq ACPI init funcs got called alreadyThomas Renninger1-2/+13
Ingo Molnar provided a fix to not call _PPC at processor driver initialization time in "[PATCH] ACPI: fix cpufreq regression" (git commit e4233dec749a3519069d9390561b5636a75c7579) But it can still happen that _PPC is called at processor driver initialization time. This patch should make sure that this is not possible anymore. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-16ACPI: change processors from array to per_cpu variableMike Travis1-9/+9
Change processors from an array sized by NR_CPUS to a per_cpu variable. Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
2008-04-29acpi: use non-racy method for proc entries creationDenis V. Lunev1-9/+4
Use proc_create()/proc_create_data() to make sure that ->proc_fops and ->data be setup before gluing PDE to main tree. Add correct ->owner to proc_fops to fix reading/module unloading race. Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-02-07ACPI: cpufreq: Print _PPC changes via cpufreq debug layerThomas Renninger1-0/+7
enabled with CPU_FREQ_DEBUG Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2008-01-01ACPI: add "processor.ignore_ppc" hook to workaround BIOS _PPC weirdnessThomas Renninger1-1/+15
There have been fixes using _PPC, which seem to unhide a problem on HP nx6125 (double cpufreq switch freezes the machine for several seconds). This one should provide a workaround for the nx6125 and for possible other machines that show any weird _PPC behaviour. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-08-07acpi-cpufreq: Fix some x86/x86-64 acpi-cpufreq driver issuesFenghua Yu1-3/+3
This patch addresses some issues in x86/x86-64 acpi-cpufreq driver: 1. Current memory allocation for acpi_perf_data is actually open-coded alloc_percpu(). The patch defines and handles acpi_perf_data as percpu data. The code will be cleaner and easier to be maintained with this change. 2. Won't load driver in acpi_cpufreq_early_init() failure case. 3. Add __init for acpi_cpufreq_early_init(). Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-04-26[CPUFREQ] Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/performance write supportThomas Renninger1-45/+1
Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/performance write support Writing to /proc/acpi/processor/xy/performance interferes with sysfs cpufreq interface. Also removes buggy cpufreq_set_policy exported symbol. Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2007-02-12ACPI: delete extra #defines in /drivers/acpi/ driversLen Brown1-1/+0
Cosmetic only. Except in a single case, #define ACPI_*_DRIVER_NAME were invoked 0 or 1 times. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-12ACPI: clean up ACPI_MODULE_NAME() useLen Brown1-1/+1
cosmetic only Make "module name" actually match the file name. Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care. Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-02ACPICA: use new ACPI headers.Alexey Starikovskiy1-6/+6
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-02-02ACPICA: minimal patch to integrate new tables into LinuxAlexey Starikovskiy1-17/+10
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2007-01-26[PATCH] ACPI: fix cpufreq regressionIngo Molnar1-4/+0
Recently cpufreq support on my laptop (Lenovo T60) broke completely: when it's plugged into AC it would never go higher than 1 GHz - neither 1.3 GHz nor 1.83 GHz is possible - no matter which governor (userspace, speed or ondemand) is used. After some cpufreq debugging i tracked the regression back to the following (totally correct) bug-fix commit: commit 0916bd3ebb7cefdd0f432e8491abe24f4b5a101e Author: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date: Wed Nov 22 20:42:01 2006 -0500 [PATCH] Correct bound checking from the value returned from _PPC method. This bugfix, which makes other laptops work, made a previously hidden (BIOS) bug visible on my laptop. The bug is the following: if the _PPC (Performance Present Capabilities) optional ACPI object is queried /after/ bootup then the BIOS reports an incorrect value of '2'. My laptop (Lenovo T60) has the following performance states supported: 0: 1833000 1: 1333000 2: 1000000 Per ACPI specification, a _PPC value of '0' means that all 3 performance states are usable. A _PPC value of '1' means states 1 .. 2 are usable, a value of '2' means only state '2' (slowest) is usable. now, the _PPC object is optional, and it also comes with notification. Furthermore, when a CPU object is initialized, the _PPC object is initialized as well. So the following evaluation of the _PPC object is superfluous: [<c028ba5f>] acpi_processor_get_platform_limit+0xa1/0xaf [<c028c040>] acpi_processor_register_performance+0x3b9/0x3ef [<c0111a85>] acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init+0xb7/0x596 [<c03dab74>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x160/0x4a8 [<c02bed90>] sysdev_driver_register+0x5a/0xa0 [<c03d9c4c>] cpufreq_register_driver+0xb4/0x176 [<c068ac08>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0xe5/0xeb [<c010056e>] init+0x14f/0x3dd And this is the point where my laptop's BIOS returns the incorrect value of '2'. Note that it has not sent any notification event, so the value is probably not really intentional (possibly spurious), and Windows likely doesnt query it after bootup either. Maybe the value is kept at '2' normally, and is only set to the real value when a true asynchronous event (such as AC plug event, battery switch, etc.) occurs. So i /think/ this is a grey area of the ACPI spec: per the letter of the spec the _PPC value only changes when notified, so there's no reason to query it after the system has booted up. So in my opinion the best (and most compatible) strategy would be to do the change below, and to not evaluate the _PPC object in the acpi_processor_get_performance_info() call, but only evaluate it if _PPC is present during CPU object init, or if it's notified during an asynchronous event. This change is more permissive than the previous logic, so it definitely shouldnt break any existing system. This also happens to fix my laptop, which is merrily chugging along at 1.83 GHz now. Yay! Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Acked-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-01-10ACPI: delete two spurious ACPI messagesVenkatesh Pallipadi1-4/+0
ACPI: Getting cpuindex for acpiid 0x4 acpi_processor-0742 [00] processor_preregister_: Error while parsing _PSD domain information. Assuming no coordination http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7286 Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>