aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/sleep (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2006-07-10ACPI: add 'const' to several ACPI file_operationsArjan van de Ven1-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-06-15Pull button into release branchLen Brown1-0/+8
2006-06-15ACPI: suppress power button event on S3 resumeArnaud Patard1-0/+8
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6612 Note that this fix depends on a fix in ACPICA 20060608 to replace a semaphore with a spin-lock. Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard <apatard@mandriva.com> Acked-by: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2006-04-03ACPI: Don't print internal BIOS names of wakeup devicesBjorn Helgaas1-3/+0
Internal BIOS names like these should be exposed to the user as little as possible: ACPI wakeup devices: C069 C0CE C1D1 C0DE C1D4 Eventually, the "wakeup" property of a device should be exported via the device tree, not by a printk of an internal BIOS name. For the hard-core, these are still available in /proc/acpi/wakeup_devices, just not printed to dmesg. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-12-15[ACPI] fix reboot upon suspend-to-diskAlexey Starikovskiy3-10/+13
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4320 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-10-30[PATCH] introduce .valid callback for pm_opsShaohua Li1-0/+8
Add pm_ops.valid callback, so only the available pm states show in /sys/power/state. And this also makes an earlier states error report at enter_state before we do actual suspend/resume. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek<pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-09-10[PATCH] remove ACPI S4bios supportPavel Machek3-13/+1
Remove S4BIOS support. It is pretty useless, and only ever worked for _me_ once. (I do not think anyone else ever tried it). It was in feature-removal for a long time, and it should have been removed before. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-29Auto-update from upstreamLen Brown1-1/+5
2005-08-27[PATCH] acpi_shutdown: Only prepare for power off on power_offEric W. Biederman1-1/+5
When acpi_sleep_prepare was moved into a shutdown method we started calling it for all shutdowns. It appears this triggers some systems to power off on reboot. Avoid this by only calling acpi_sleep_prepare if we are going to power off the system. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-08-05[ACPI] Lindent all ACPI filesLen Brown3-177/+183
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-08-05[ACPI] whitespacePavel Machek1-24/+10
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-07-26[PATCH] acpi: Don't call acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_offEric W. Biederman1-21/+12
Now that all of the code paths that call acpi_power_off have been modified to call either call kernel_power_off (which calls apci_sleep_prepare by way of acpi_shutdown) or to call acpi_sleep_prepare directly it is redundant to call acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_off. So simplify the code and simply don't call acpi_sleep_prepare. In addition there is a little error handling done so if we can't register the acpi class we don't hook pm_power_off. I think I have done the right thing with the CONFIG_PM define but I'm not certain. Can this code even be compiled if CONFIG_PM is false? Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-26[PATCH] acpi_power_off: Don't switch to the boot cpuEric W. Biederman1-1/+0
machine_power_off on i386 and x86_64 now switch to the boot cpu out of paranoia and because the MP Specification indicates it is a good idea on reboot, so for those architectures it is a noop. I can't see anything in the acpi spec that requires you to be on the boot cpu to power off the system, so this should not be an issue for ia64. In addition ia64 has the altix a massive multi-node system where switching to the boot cpu sounds insane as we may hot removed the boot cpu. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-12[ACPI] Deprecate /proc/acpi/sleep in favor of /sys/power/stateLen Brown1-0/+9
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-07-11[ACPI] ACPI poweroff fixAlexey Starikovskiy2-50/+105
Register an "acpi" system device to be notified of shutdown preparation. This depends on CONFIG_PM http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds6-0/+1004
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
Copyright © 1996 – 2023 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.