aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct vddc phase control settingEvan Quan2-14/+24
Correct Polaris10 vddc phase control. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct avfs fuse settingsEvan Quan1-32/+23
Correct Polaris10 avfs fuse setting. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct Polaris DIDT configurationsEvan Quan1-2/+32
Correct Polaris DIDT enablement. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct Polaris powertune table setupEvan Quan2-1/+84
Correct powertune table setup for Polaris. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct the checks for sclk/mclk SS supportEvan Quan4-1/+26
Correct sclk/mclk SS support checks. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct VR shared rail infoEvan Quan3-0/+29
Add VR shared rail info. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: add mc register table initializationEvan Quan4-0/+58
Add mc register table initialization. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: add edc leakage controller settingEvan Quan4-0/+233
Enable edc controller table setting. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: setup zero rpm parameters for polaris10Evan Quan2-0/+28
Only if the ZeroRPM feature is supported. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct polaris10 clock stretcher data table settingEvan Quan1-31/+11
By using the saved copy of ro_range_maximum and ro_range_minimum. Correct the setting for "LdoRefSel". Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct the settings for ro range minimum and maximumEvan Quan2-0/+65
Make the settings more precise. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: drop redundant efuse mask calculationsEvan Quan4-6/+10
By moving that in atomfw_read_efuse(). Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: optimize AC timing programmingEvan Quan1-1/+1
Programming AC Timing Parameters is only dependent on MCLK. No need to nest loop for each SCLK DPM level. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/powerplay: separate Polaris fan table setup from TongaEvan Quan2-1/+87
Instead of sharing the fan table setup with Tonga, Polaris has its own fan table setup. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: add PWR_CKS_CNTL settingEvan Quan1-4/+11
This is for some special Polaris10 ASICs. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: drop arb table first byte workaroundEvan Quan1-31/+0
As this is not needed for polaris. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: add pptable VRHotLevel settingEvan Quan1-0/+3
Add missing VRHotLevel setting. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct the BootLinkLevel setupEvan Quan1-1/+1
Set the BootLinkLevel as the max level. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct the ACPI table setup V2Evan Quan1-1/+2
Correct the setting for "ActivityLevel". V2: rich the comment Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct mclk table setupEvan Quan1-12/+8
Correct the settings for "StutterEnable" and "EnabledForActivity". Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct sclk table setupEvan Quan1-2/+21
Correct Polaris10 sclk table setup. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: correct vddci table setupEvan Quan1-2/+2
Make sure the settings are applied only when voltage controlled by gpio. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: populate smc samu tableEvan Quan1-0/+53
Add missing smc samu table setup. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-27drm/amd/pm: populate smc vddc tableEvan Quan1-0/+26
Add missing vddc table setup. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-14drm/amd/pm: increase mclk switch threshold to 200 usEvan Quan1-1/+1
To avoid underflow seen on Polaris10 with some 3440x1440 144Hz displays. As the threshold of 190 us cuts too close to minVBlankTime of 192 us. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_pcie_tableGustavo A. R. Silva3-21/+13
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_pcie_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7db0bc.7Xivn4K83f7XW0ug%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_voltage_lookup_tableGustavo A. R. Silva3-15/+7
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_voltage_lookup_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61df.jWrFfnjxGbjSkPOp%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_tableGustavo A. R. Silva3-14/+8
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61e2.qiTVTyG2pVoG8bb0%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_tableGustavo A. R. Silva3-56/+27
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_tableGustavo A. R. Silva1-7/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3a.ryM4GmZr3e0JeZy+%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_cac_leakage_tableGustavo A. R. Silva1-8/+5
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_cac_leakage_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) when it should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d38.iT%2FQTjN+659XUDo5%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_tableGustavo A. R. Silva1-7/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d35.pJToGs3H9khZK6ws%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_tableGustavo A. R. Silva1-8/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying ptable->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d36.6PStUZp2HRxAz7IM%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_tableGustavo A. R. Silva1-7/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3c.TyfOhg%2FA6JycL6ZN%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_tableGustavo A. R. Silva1-7/+4
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table) when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433e.pXkC6KsN6HN%2FLdhj%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_clock_arrayGustavo A. R. Silva3-17/+10
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_clock_array, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433f.ZyMD+YUIVAwiHGVe%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-10-09drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva3-10/+6
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2]. Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c295c.8iqp1Ifc6oiVDq%2F%2F%25lkp@intel.com/ Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-29drm/amd/powerplay: add one sysfs file to support the feature to modify gfx clock on Raven/Raven2/Picasso APU.Xiaojian Du3-2/+96
This patch is to add one sysfs file -- "pp_od_clk_voltage" for Raven/Raven2/Picasso APU, which is only used by dGPU like VEGA10. This sysfs file supports the feature to modify gfx engine clock(Mhz units), it can be used to configure the min value and the max value for gfx clock limited in the safe range. Command guide: echo "s level clock" > pp_od_clk_voltage s - adjust teh sclk level level - 0 or 1, "0" represents the min value, "1" represents the max value clock - the clock value(Mhz units), like 400, 800 or 1200, the value must be within the OD_RANGE limits. Example: $ cat pp_od_clk_voltage OD_SCLK: 0: 200Mhz 1: 1400Mhz OD_RANGE: SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz $ echo "s 0 600" > pp_od_clk_voltage $ echo "s 1 1000" > pp_od_clk_voltage $ cat pp_od_clk_voltage OD_SCLK: 0: 600Mhz 1: 1000Mhz OD_RANGE: SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-25drm/amdgpu: Remove some useless codeEmily.Deng1-7/+0
Signed-off-by: Emily.Deng <Emily.Deng@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Frank Min <Frank.Min@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-25drm/amd: Skip not used microcode loading in SRIOVJingwen Chen1-5/+7
smc, sdma, sos, ta and asd fw is not used in SRIOV. Skip them to accelerate sw_init for navi12. v2: skip above fw in SRIOV for vega10 and sienna_cichlid v3: directly skip psp fw loading in SRIOV Signed-off-by: Jingwen Chen <Jingwen.Chen2@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Emily.Deng <Emily.Deng@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-22drm/amd/pm: Removed fixed clock in auto mode DPMSudheesh Mavila1-4/+6
SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_FCLK value should not be used to set the DPM. Suggested-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sudheesh Mavila <sudheesh.mavila@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-22drm/amd/powerplay: optimize the mclk dpm policy settingsEvan Quan1-3/+13
Different mclk dpm policy will be applied based on the VRAM width. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-17drm/amdgpu/powerplay: hwmgr - modify the return valueXiaoliang Pang2-2/+2
Return value should be -EINVAL rather than EINVAL Fixes: f83a9991648bb("drm/amd/powerplay: add Vega10 powerplay support (v5)") Fixes: 2cac05dee6e30("drm/amd/powerplay: add the hw manager for vega12 (v4)") Cc: Eric Huang <JinHuiEric.Huang@amd.com> Cc: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaoliang Pang <dawning.pang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-17drm/amd/pm: lower Raven UMD Stable Pstate VCN valuesEvan Quan2-2/+3
SMU FCLK,SOCCLK have dependency on VCN CLKs. Lower VCN values so that FCLK, SOCCLK reflect values set by UMD Stable Pstate. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-17drm/amd/pm: add Raven2 watermark WmType settingEvan Quan1-0/+11
Which tells it's a normal pstate change or memory retraining. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Tested-by: Changfeng Zhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-09-08Merge tag 'amd-drm-next-5.10-2020-09-03' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-nextDave Airlie124-0/+82810
amd-drm-next-5.10-2020-09-03: amdgpu: - RAS fixes - Sienna Cichlid updates - Navy Flounder updates - DCE6 (SI) support in DC - Enable plane rotation - Rework pre-OS vram reservation handling during driver init - Add standard interface to dump GPU metrics table from SMU - Rework tiling and tmz state handling in atomic commits - Pstate fixes - Add voltage and power hwmon interfaces for renoir - SW CTF fixes - S/G display fix for Raven - Print client strings for vmfaults for vega and newer - Manual fan control fixes - Display updates - Reorg power management directory structure - Misc bug fixes - Misc code cleanups amdkfd: - Topology fixes - Add SMI events for thermal throttling and GPU resets radeon: - switch from pci_* to dma_* for dma allocations - PLL fix Scheduler: - Clean up priority levels UAPI: - amdgpu INFO IOCTL query update for TMZ state https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6049 - amdkfd SMI event interface updates https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib/tree/therm_thrott From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200903222921.4152-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
2020-08-27drm/amdgpu: Fix bug in reporting voltage for CIKSandeep Raghuraman1-1/+2
On my R9 390, the voltage was reported as a constant 1000 mV. This was due to a bug in smu7_hwmgr.c, in the smu7_read_sensor() function, where some magic constants were used in a condition, to determine whether the voltage should be read from PLANE2_VID or PLANE1_VID. The VDDC mask was incorrectly used, instead of the VDDGFX mask. This patch changes the code to use the correct defined constants (and apply the correct bitshift), thus resulting in correct voltage reporting. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-08-27drm/amdgpu: Specify get_argument function for ci_smu_funcsSandeep Raghuraman1-0/+2
Starting in Linux 5.8, the graphics and memory clock frequency were not being reported for CIK cards. This is a regression, since they were reported correctly in Linux 5.7. After investigation, I discovered that the smum_send_msg_to_smc() function, attempts to call the corresponding get_argument() function of ci_smu_funcs. However, the get_argument() function is not defined in ci_smu_funcs. This patch fixes the bug by specifying the correct get_argument() function. Fixes: a0ec225633d9f6 ("drm/amd/powerplay: unified interfaces for message issuing and response checking") Signed-off-by: Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-08-27drm/amd/pm: suppress static checker warningEvan Quan1-1/+4
Suppress the warning below: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/powerplay/hwmgr/hardwaremanager.c:274 phm_check_smc_update_required_for_display_configuration() warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)' Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-08-27drm/amd/pm: avoid false alarm due to confusing softwareshutdowntemp settingEvan Quan1-2/+12
Normally softwareshutdowntemp should be greater than Thotspotlimit. However, on some VEGA10 ASIC, the softwareshutdowntemp is 91C while Thotspotlimit is 105C. This seems not right and may trigger some false alarms. Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Copyright © 1996 – 2026 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.