| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
With GuC virtual engines the physical engine which a request executes
and completes on isn't known to the i915. Therefore we can't attach a
request to a physical engines breadcrumbs. To work around this we create
a single breadcrumbs per engine class when using GuC submission and
direct all physical engine interrupts to this breadcrumbs.
v2:
(John H)
- Rework header file structure so intel_engine_mask_t can be in
intel_engine_types.h
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
CC: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210727002348.97202-6-matthew.brost@intel.com
|
|
Before we mark the virtual engine as no longer inflight, flush any
ongoing signaling that may be using the ce->signal_link along the
previous breadcrumbs. On switch to a new physical engine, that link will
be inserted into the new set of breadcrumbs, causing confusion to an
ongoing iterator.
This patch undoes a last minute mistake introduced into commit
bab0557c8dca ("drm/i915/gt: Remove virtual breadcrumb before transfer"),
whereby instead of unconditionally applying the flush, it was only
applied if the request itself was going to be reused.
v2: Generalise and cancel all remaining ce->signals
Fixes: bab0557c8dca ("drm/i915/gt: Remove virtual breadcrumb before transfer")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210108204026.20682-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Matthew Brost pointed out that the while-loop on a shared breadcrumb was
inherently fraught with danger as it competed with the other users of
the breadcrumbs. However, in order to completely drain the re-arming irq
worker, the while-loop is a necessity, despite my optimism that we could
force cancellation with a couple of irq_work invocations.
Given that we can't merely drop the while-loop, use an activity counter on
the breadcrumbs to detect when we are parking the breadcrumbs for the
last time.
Based on a patch by Matthew Brost.
Reported-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Fixes: 9d5612ca165a ("drm/i915/gt: Defer enabling the breadcrumb interrupt to after submission")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201217091524.10258-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
On the virtual engines, we only use the intel_breadcrumbs for tracking
signaling of stale breadcrumbs from the irq_workers. They do not have
any associated interrupt handling, active requests are passed to a
physical engine and associated breadcrumb interrupt handler. This causes
issues for us as we need to ensure that we do not actually try and
enable interrupts and the powermanagement required for them on the
virtual engine, as they will never be disabled. Instead, let's
specify the physical engine used for interrupt handler on a particular
breadcrumb.
v2: Drop b->irq_armed = true mocking for no interrupt HW
Fixes: 4fe6abb8f513 ("drm/i915/gt: Ignore irq enabling on the virtual engines")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200731154834.8378-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
Matthew Brost
Chris Wilson