| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Currently the code for manipulating the pages on an object is still
residing in i915_gem.c, move it to i915_gem_object.c
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In order to avoid the malloc inside i915_globals_park() occurring
underneath a lock connected to the shrinker (thus causing circular
lockdeps warnings), move the rcu_worker to a global.
<4> [39.085073] ======================================================
<4> [39.085273] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [39.085552] 5.1.0-rc3-CI-Trybot_4088+ #1 Tainted: G U
<4> [39.085752] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [39.085949] kswapd0/32 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [39.086121] 00000000004b5f91 (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915]
<4> [39.086493]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [39.086682] 00000000dd009a9a (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30
<4> [39.086910]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4> [39.087139]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4> [39.087356]
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}:
<4> [39.087604] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30
<4> [39.087785] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290
<4> [39.087998] i915_globals_park+0x22/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [39.088478] idle_work_handler+0x1df/0x220 [i915]
<4> [39.089016] process_one_work+0x245/0x610
<4> [39.089447] worker_thread+0x37/0x380
<4> [39.089956] kthread+0x119/0x130
<4> [39.090374] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
<4> [39.090868]
-> #1 (wakeref#4){+.+.}:
<4> [39.091569] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960
<4> [39.092054] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50
<4> [39.092521] intel_gt_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915]
<4> [39.093047] intel_engine_park+0xeb/0x1d0 [i915]
<4> [39.093514] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x10/0x30 [i915]
<4> [39.094062] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915]
<4> [39.094547] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915]
<4> [39.095110] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915]
<4> [39.095587] i915_gem_wait_for_idle.part.22+0xb2/0xf0 [i915]
<4> [39.096142] switch_to_kernel_context_sync+0x2a/0x70 [i915]
<4> [39.096633] i915_gem_init+0x59c/0x9c0 [i915]
<4> [39.097174] i915_driver_load+0xd96/0x1880 [i915]
<4> [39.097640] i915_pci_probe+0x29/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [39.098145] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x120
<4> [39.098607] really_probe+0xf3/0x3e0
<4> [39.099031] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120
<4> [39.099599] device_driver_attach+0x4b/0x50
<4> [39.100033] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130
<4> [39.100525] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0
<4> [39.100954] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210
<4> [39.101441] driver_register+0x56/0xe0
<4> [39.101891] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0
<4> [39.102319] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea
<4> [39.102805] load_module+0x2701/0x29e0
<4> [39.103231] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0
<4> [39.103727] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190
<4> [39.104153] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4> [39.104736]
-> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}:
<4> [39.105437] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0
<4> [39.105923] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960
<4> [39.106345] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50
<4> [39.106897] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915]
<4> [39.107375] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915]
<4> [39.107930] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915]
<4> [39.108412] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915]
<4> [39.108934] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915]
<4> [39.109431] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x59/0x130 [i915]
<4> [39.109884] do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x3e0
<4> [39.110380] shrink_slab+0x228/0x2c0
<4> [39.110810] shrink_node+0x177/0x460
<4> [39.111317] balance_pgdat+0x239/0x580
<4> [39.111743] kswapd+0x186/0x570
<4> [39.112221] kthread+0x119/0x130
<4> [39.112641] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190408091728.20207-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
In preparation for an ever growing number of engines and so ever
increasing static array of HW contexts within the GEM context, move the
array over to an rbtree, allocated upon first use.
Unfortunately, this imposes an rbtree lookup at a few frequent callsites,
but we should be able to mitigate those by moving over to using the HW
context as our primary type and so only incur the lookup on the boundary
with the user GEM context and engines.
v2: Check for no HW context in guc_stage_desc_init
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190308132522.21573-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Rather than manually add every new global into each hook, use
i915_global_register() function and keep a list of registered globals to
invoke instead.
However, I haven't found a way for random drivers to add an .init table
to avoid having to manually add ourselves to i915_globals_init() each
time.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190305213830.18094-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
|
|
As our allocations are not device specific, we can move our slab caches
to a global scope.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190228102035.5857-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
As kmem_caches share the same properties (size, allocation/free behaviour)
for all potential devices, we can use global caches. While this
potential has worse fragmentation behaviour (one can argue that
different devices would have different activity lifetimes, but you can
also argue that activity is temporal across the system) it is the
default behaviour of the system at large to amalgamate matching caches.
The benefit for us is much reduced pointer dancing along the frequent
allocation paths.
v2: Defer shrinking until after a global grace period for futureproofing
multiple consumers of the slab caches, similar to the current strategy
for avoiding shrinking too early.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190228102035.5857-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
Chris Wilson