| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Asynchronous command parsing was the only thing which ever returned a
non-zero error. With that gone, we can drop the error handling from
dma_fence_work.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714193419.1459723-5-jason@jlekstrand.net
|
|
If the caller allows and we do not have to wait for any signals,
immediately execute the work within the caller's process. By doing so we
avoid the overhead of scheduling a new task, and the latency in
executing it, at the cost of pulling that work back into the immediate
context. (Sometimes we still prefer to offload the task to another cpu,
especially if we plan on executing many such tasks in parallel for this
client.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200325120227.8044-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Extract the dma-fence worker used by clflush for wider use, as we
anticipate using workers coupled to dma-fences more frequently.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190821191606.17001-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
Jason Ekstrand
Chris Wilson