aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-06-16drm/i915: Store a direct lookup from object handle to vmaChris Wilson1-0/+5
The advent of full-ppgtt lead to an extra indirection between the object and its binding. That extra indirection has a noticeable impact on how fast we can convert from the user handles to our internal vma for execbuffer. In order to bypass the extra indirection, we use a resizable hashtable to jump from the object to the per-ctx vma. rhashtable was considered but we don't need the online resizing feature and the extra complexity proved to undermine its usefulness. Instead, we simply reallocate the hastable on demand in a background task and serialize it before iterating. In non-full-ppgtt modes, multiple files and multiple contexts can share the same vma. This leads to having multiple possible handle->vma links, so we only use the first to establish the fast path. The majority of buffers are not shared and so we should still be able to realise speedups with multiple clients. v2: Prettier names, more magic. v3: Many style tweaks, most notably hiding the misuse of execobj[].rsvd2 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2017-05-17drm/i915: Split execlist priority queue into rbtree + linked listChris Wilson1-0/+9
All the requests at the same priority are executed in FIFO order. They do not need to be stored in the rbtree themselves, as they are a simple list within a level. If we move the requests at one priority into a list, we can then reduce the rbtree to the set of priorities. This should keep the height of the rbtree small, as the number of active priorities can not exceed the number of active requests and should be typically only a few. Currently, we have ~2k possible different priority levels, that may increase to allow even more fine grained selection. Allocating those in advance seems a waste (and may be impossible), so we opt for allocating upon first use, and freeing after its requests are depleted. To avoid the possibility of an allocation failure causing us to lose a request, we preallocate the default priority (0) and bump any request to that priority if we fail to allocate it the appropriate plist. Having a request (that is ready to run, so not leading to corruption) execute out-of-order is better than leaking the request (and its dependency tree) entirely. There should be a benefit to reducing execlists_dequeue() to principally using a simple list (and reducing the frequency of both rbtree iteration and balancing on erase) but for typical workloads, request coalescing should be small enough that we don't notice any change. The main gain is from improving PI calls to schedule, and the explicit list within a level should make request unwinding simpler (we just need to insert at the head of the list rather than the tail and not have to make the rbtree search more complicated). v2: Avoid use-after-free when deleting a depleted priolist v3: Michał found the solution to handling the allocation failure gracefully. If we disable all priority scheduling following the allocation failure, those requests will be executed in fifo and we will ensure that this request and its dependencies are in strict fifo (even when it doesn't realise it is only a single list). Normal scheduling is restored once we know the device is idle, until the next failure! Suggested-by: Michał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-05-17drm/i915: Redefine ptr_pack_bits() and friendsChris Wilson1-6/+13
Rebrand the current (pointer | bits) pack/unpack utility macros as explicit bit twiddling for PAGE_SIZE so that we can use the more flexible underlying macros for different bits. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-05-17drm/i915: Make ptr_unpack_bits() more function-likeChris Wilson1-1/+1
ptr_unpack_bits() is a function-like macro, as such it is meant to be replaceable by a function. In this case, we should be passing in the out-param as a pointer. Bizarrely this does affect code generation: function old new delta i915_gem_object_pin_map 409 389 -20 An improvement(?) in this case, but one can't help wonder what strict-aliasing optimisations we are preventing. The generated code looks identical in using ptr_unpack_bits (no extra motions to stack, the pointer and bits appear to be kept in registers), the difference appears to be code ordering and with a reorder it is able to use smaller forward jumps. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2017-05-09drm/i915: Move uncore definitions into a separate headerMichal Wajdeczko1-0/+6
In order to allow use of e.g. forcewake_domains in a other feature headers included from the top of i915_drv.h, move all uncore related definitions into their own header. v2: move __mask_next_bit macro to utils header (Mika) Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
2017-03-29drm/i915: Move WARN_ON/MISSING_CASE macros to i915_utils.hMichal Wajdeczko1-0/+18
We can't sometimes use these macros in other headers due to include and definition order. As i915_utils.h already contains other helper macros move these macros there. v2: checkpatch cleanup for WARN() macro. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170328084513.174200-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2017-03-15drm/i915/guc: Use formalized struct definition for ads objectMichal Wajdeczko1-0/+2
Manual pointer manipulation is error prone. Let compiler calculate right offsets for us in case we need to change ads layout. v2: don't call it object (Chris) v3: restyle offset assignments (Chris) v4: stylistic reductions Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170314133309.126432-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2017-01-31drm/i915: Sanity check the computed size and base of stolen memoryChris Wilson1-0/+11
Just do a quick check that the stolen memory address range doesn't overflow our chosen integer type. v2: Add add_overflows() to utils with the promise that gcc7 can do this better than C and then maybe it will have a proper definition in core. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170130134721.5159-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2017-01-05drm/i915: Move a few more utility macros to i915_utils.hChris Wilson1-0/+20
Now that we have split out a header file for simple macros (that maybe we can promote into a core header), move a few macros across from i915_drv.h Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170105164148.26875-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
2017-01-05drm/i915: Move a few utility macros into a separate headerChris Wilson1-0/+44
In order to defeat some circular dependencies between headers to allow use of e.g. range_overflows() in a header, move the simple independent macros into their own header. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170105153023.30575-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk