| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
After all the rework is done it is now possible to include single flags in
the type macros. Any user of UVERBS_ATTR_STRUCT needs to zero check data
past the end of the known struct to be correct, so make this mandatory,
and get rid of MIN_SZ_OR_ZERO as a user flag.
This changes UVERBS_ATTR_TYPE to refer to a struct of exact size with not
possibility of extension, convert the few users of UVERBS_ATTR_TYPE and
MIN_SZ_OR_ZERO to use UVERBS_ATTR_STRUCT.
The one user of UVERBS_ATTR_STRUCT without MIN_SZ_OR_ZERO is just
confused. There is some padding at the end of that struct, but userspace
always provides it with the padding. The construction doesn't test if the
padding is zero, so it is pointless. Just use UVERBS_ATTR_TYPE.
Finally, rename min_sz_or_zero to zero_trailing to better reflect what it
does and hopefully avoid such mis-uses in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
|
|
This bit of boilerplate isn't really necessary, we can use bitfields
instead of a flags enum and the macros can then individually initialize
them through the __VA_ARGS__ like everything else.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
|
|
Instead of using a complex cascade of macros, just directly provide the
initializer list each of the declarations is trying to create.
Now that the macros are simplified this also reworks the uverbs_attr_spec
to be friendly to older compilers by eliminating any unnamed
structures/unions inside, and removing the duplication of some fields. The
structure size remains at 16 bytes which was the original motivation for
some of this oddness.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
|
|
One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding
the size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along
with memory for some number of elements for that array. For example:
struct foo {
int stuff;
void *entry[];
};
instance = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo) + sizeof(void *) * count, GFP_KERNEL);
Instead of leaving these open-coded and prone to type mistakes, we can
now use the new struct_size() helper:
instance = kmalloc(struct_size(instance, entry, count), GFP_KERNEL);
This patch makes the changes for kmalloc()-family (and kvmalloc()-family)
uses. It was done via automatic conversion with manual review for the
"CHECKME" non-standard cases noted below, using the following Coccinelle
script:
// pkey_cache = kmalloc(sizeof *pkey_cache + tprops->pkey_tbl_len *
// sizeof *pkey_cache->table, GFP_KERNEL);
@@
identifier alloc =~ "kmalloc|kzalloc|kvmalloc|kvzalloc";
expression GFP;
identifier VAR, ELEMENT;
expression COUNT;
@@
- alloc(sizeof(*VAR) + COUNT * sizeof(*VAR->ELEMENT), GFP)
+ alloc(struct_size(VAR, ELEMENT, COUNT), GFP)
// mr = kzalloc(sizeof(*mr) + m * sizeof(mr->map[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
@@
identifier alloc =~ "kmalloc|kzalloc|kvmalloc|kvzalloc";
expression GFP;
identifier VAR, ELEMENT;
expression COUNT;
@@
- alloc(sizeof(*VAR) + COUNT * sizeof(VAR->ELEMENT[0]), GFP)
+ alloc(struct_size(VAR, ELEMENT, COUNT), GFP)
// Same pattern, but can't trivially locate the trailing element name,
// or variable name.
@@
identifier alloc =~ "kmalloc|kzalloc|kvmalloc|kvzalloc";
expression GFP;
expression SOMETHING, COUNT, ELEMENT;
@@
- alloc(sizeof(SOMETHING) + COUNT * sizeof(ELEMENT), GFP)
+ alloc(CHECKME_struct_size(&SOMETHING, ELEMENT, COUNT), GFP)
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
|
|
Previously, we've used UVERBS_ATTR_SPEC_F_MIN_SZ for extending existing
attributes. The behavior of this flag was the kernel accepts anything
bigger than the minimum size it specified. This is unsafe, since in
order to safely extend an attribute, we need to make sure unknown size
is zeroed. Replacing UVERBS_ATTR_SPEC_F_MIN_SZ with
UVERBS_ATTR_SPEC_F_MIN_SZ_OR_ZERO, which essentially checks that the
unknown size is zero. In addition, attributes are now decorated with
UVERBS_ATTR_TYPE and UVERBS_ATTR_STRUCT, so we can provide the minimum
and known length.
Users of this flag needs to use copy_from_or_zero functions/macros.
Reviewed-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
|
|
Fix a bug in uverbs_ioctl_merge that looked at the object's iterator
number instead of the method's iterator number when merging methods.
While we're at it, make the uverbs_ioctl_merge code a bit more clear
and faster.
Fixes: 118620d3686b ('IB/core: Add uverbs merge trees functionality')
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
|
|
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in WARN message
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
|
|
Different drivers support different features and even subset of the
common uverbs implementation. Currently, this is handled as bitmask
in every driver that represents which kind of methods it supports, but
doesn't go down to attributes granularity. Moreover, drivers might
want to add their specific types, methods and attributes to let
their user-space counter-parts be exposed to some more efficient
abstractions. It means that existence of different features is
validated syntactically via the parsing infrastructure rather than
using a complex in-handler logic.
In order to do that, we allow defining features and abstractions
as parsing trees. These per-feature parsing tree could be merged
to an efficient (perfect-hash based) parsing tree, which is later
used by the parsing infrastructure.
To sum it up, this makes a parse tree unique for a device and
represents only the features this particular device supports.
This is done by having a root specification tree per feature.
Before a device registers itself as an IB device, it merges
all these trees into one parsing tree. This parsing tree
is used to parse all user-space commands.
A future user-space application could read this parse tree. This
tree represents which objects, methods and attributes are
supported by this device.
This is based on the idea of
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
|
Jason Gunthorpe
Kees Cook
Matan Barak
Colin Ian King