| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The knowledge of the internal workings of the expect receive
is too distributed.
Fix by:
- right size several rcd fields associated with
expect receive
- making an init entrance to init all the lists
- consolidate all the allocations into an array anchored
in the rcd
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
|
|
The expected receive lists (tid_xxx_list) are not initialized until
late in the receive context initialization. If an error happens
before the initialization, a NULL pointer access will occur during
cleanup.
Initialized the lists sooner rather than later to avoid this Oops:
IP: unlock_exp_tids.isra.11+0x26/0xd0 [hfi1]
RIP: 0010:unlock_exp_tids.isra.11+0x26/0xd0 [hfi1]
Call Trace:
hfi1_user_exp_rcv_free+0x79/0xb0 [hfi1]
hfi1_file_close+0x87/0x360 [hfi1]
__fput+0xe7/0x210
____fput+0xe/0x10
Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Sanchez <sebastian.sanchez@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
|
|
Declarations and code in common between verbs and PSM are now moved
to exp_rcv.[ch].
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
|
Mike Marciniszyn
Michael J. Ruhl