aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-smq.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-12-08dm cache policy smq: use hash_32() instead of hash_32_generic()Mike Snitzer1-1/+1
Switch to using hash_32() because hash_32_generic() should only be used by the kernel's selftests. Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-09-22dm cache policy smq: distribute entries to random levels when switching to smqJoe Thornber1-1/+6
For smq the 32 bit 'hint' stores the multiqueue level that the entry should be stored in. If a different policy has been used previously, and then switched to smq, the hints will be invalid. In which case we used to put all entries in the bottom level of the multiqueue, and then redistribute. Redistribution is faster if we put entries with invalid hints in random levels initially. Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-09-22dm cache: speed up writing of the hint arrayJoe Thornber1-32/+6
It's far quicker to always delete the hint array and recreate with dm_array_new() because we avoid the copying caused by mutation. Also simplifies the policy interface, replacing the walk_hints() with the simpler get_hint(). Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-03-10dm cache policy smq: clarify that mq registration failure was for 'mq'Mike Snitzer1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2016-03-10dm cache: make the 'mq' policy an alias for 'smq'Joe Thornber1-7/+85
smq seems to be performing better than the old mq policy in all situations, as well as using a quarter of the memory. Make 'mq' an alias for 'smq' when choosing a cache policy. The tunables that were present for the old mq are faked, and have no effect. mq should be considered deprecated now. Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-10-31dm: convert ffs to __ffsMikulas Patocka1-1/+1
ffs counts bit starting with 1 (for the least significant bit), __ffs counts bits starting with 0. This patch changes various occurrences of ffs to __ffs and removes subtraction of 1 from the result. Note that __ffs (unlike ffs) is not defined when called with zero argument, but it is not called with zero argument in any of these cases. Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-08-12dm cache policy smq: change the mutex to a spinlockJoe Thornber1-71/+39
We no longer sleep in any of the smq functions, so this can become a spinlock. Switching from mutex to spinlock improves performance when the fast cache device is a very low latency device (e.g. NVMe SSD). The switch to spinlock also allows for removal of the extra tick_lock; which is no longer needed since the main lock being a spinlock now fulfills the locking requirements needed by interrupt context. Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-08-12dm cache policy smq: move 'dm-cache-default' module alias to SMQYi Zhang1-0/+2
When creating dm-cache with the default policy, it will call request_module("dm-cache-default") to register the default policy. But the "dm-cache-default" alias was left referring to the MQ policy. Fix this by moving the module alias to SMQ. Fixes: bccab6a0 (dm cache: switch the "default" cache replacement policy from mq to smq) Signed-off-by: Yi Zhang <yizhan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-07-27dm cache policy smq: fix alloc_bitset check that always evaluates as falseColin Ian King1-1/+1
static analysis by cppcheck has found a check on alloc_bitset that always evaluates as false and hence never finds an allocation failure: [drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-smq.c:1689]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: !EXPR && EXPR. Fix this by removing the incorrect mq->cache_hit_bits check Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-06-26dm cache policy smq: fix "default" version to be 1.4.0Mike Snitzer1-1/+1
Commit bccab6a0 ("dm cache: switch the "default" cache replacement policy from mq to smq") should've incremented the "default" policy's version number to 1.4.0 rather than reverting to version 1.0.0. Reported-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-06-17dm cache: switch the "default" cache replacement policy from mq to smqMike Snitzer1-0/+17
The Stochastic multiqueue (SMQ) policy (vs MQ) offers the promise of less memory utilization, improved performance and increased adaptability in the face of changing workloads. SMQ also does not have any cumbersome tuning knobs. Users may switch from "mq" to "smq" simply by appropriately reloading a DM table that is using the cache target. Doing so will cause all of the mq policy's hints to be dropped. Also, performance of the cache may degrade slightly until smq recalculates the origin device's hotspots that should be cached. In the future the "mq" policy will just silently make use of "smq" and the mq code will be removed. Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Acked-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
2015-06-11dm cache: age and write back cache entries even without active IOJoe Thornber1-1/+7
The policy tick() method is normally called from interrupt context. Both the mq and smq policies do some bottom half work for the tick method in their map functions. However if no IO is going through the cache, then that bottom half work doesn't occur. With these policies this means recently hit entries do not age and do not get written back as early as we'd like. Fix this by introducing a new 'can_block' parameter to the tick() method. When this is set the bottom half work occurs immediately. 'can_block' is set when the tick method is called every second by the core target (not in interrupt context). Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
2015-06-11dm cache: add stochastic-multi-queue (smq) policyJoe Thornber1-0/+1768
The stochastic-multi-queue (smq) policy addresses some of the problems with the current multiqueue (mq) policy. Memory usage ------------ The mq policy uses a lot of memory; 88 bytes per cache block on a 64 bit machine. SMQ uses 28bit indexes to implement it's data structures rather than pointers. It avoids storing an explicit hit count for each block. It has a 'hotspot' queue rather than a pre cache which uses a quarter of the entries (each hotspot block covers a larger area than a single cache block). All these mean smq uses ~25bytes per cache block. Still a lot of memory, but a substantial improvement nontheless. Level balancing --------------- MQ places entries in different levels of the multiqueue structures based on their hit count (~ln(hit count)). This means the bottom levels generally have the most entries, and the top ones have very few. Having unbalanced levels like this reduces the efficacy of the multiqueue. SMQ does not maintain a hit count, instead it swaps hit entries with the least recently used entry from the level above. The over all ordering being a side effect of this stochastic process. With this scheme we can decide how many entries occupy each multiqueue level, resulting in better promotion/demotion decisions. Adaptability ------------ The MQ policy maintains a hit count for each cache block. For a different block to get promoted to the cache it's hit count has to exceed the lowest currently in the cache. This means it can take a long time for the cache to adapt between varying IO patterns. Periodically degrading the hit counts could help with this, but I haven't found a nice general solution. SMQ doesn't maintain hit counts, so a lot of this problem just goes away. In addition it tracks performance of the hotspot queue, which is used to decide which blocks to promote. If the hotspot queue is performing badly then it starts moving entries more quickly between levels. This lets it adapt to new IO patterns very quickly. Performance ----------- In my tests SMQ shows substantially better performance than MQ. Once this matures a bit more I'm sure it'll become the default policy. Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>