| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Once removed, an rcu_torture element can be deferred-freed by a chain
of call_rcu() invocations, with each callback invoking another round of
call_rcu() until either a fixed number of call_rcu() invocations have
been chained or until the test ends. This means that if the test ends,
some of the rcu_torture elements will be "stranded" partway through the
deferred-free process, which results in false-positive warnings from
rcu_torture_writer() due to lack of forward progress should the test
end just at the end of a stutter interval.
This commit therefore suppresses rcu_torture_writer()'s forward-progress
checks when the test ends in order to avoid these false-positive reports..
Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
In !PREEMPT kernels, cond_resched() is a no-op. In NO_HZ_FULL kernels,
in-kernel execution (such as that of rcutorture's kthreads) might extend
indefinitely without the scheduler gaining the aid of a scheduling-clock
interrupt. This combination can make the interaction of an rcutorture
forward-progress test and a CPU-hotplug stop_machine operation make less
forward progress than one might like. Additionally, Sebastian Siewior
notes that NO_HZ_FULL kernels have a scheduler check upon return to
userspace execution, which suggests that in-kernel emulation of tight
userspace loops containing system calls doing call_rcu() might also need
explicit checks in the PREEMPT && NO_HZ_FULL case.
This commit therefore introduces a rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cond_resched()
function that explicitly invokes schedule() in such kernels whenever
need_resched() returns true, while retaining use of cond_resched()
for kernels that are either !PREEMPT or !NO_HZ_FULL.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Because TREE01 can end up running more vCPUs that physical CPUs,
hammering these shortchanged CPUs with tight loops containing call_rcu()
invocations seems a bit like overkill. This commit therefore exempts
TREE01 from rcutorture's forward-progress testing.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
After the end of each stutter pause interval, the rcu_torture_writer()
kthread checks to be sure that all prior callbacks have completed so
that all the test structures have been freed. This works fine except
for tasks RCU, in which grace periods can take one good long time.
This commit therefore exempts tasks RCU from this check.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
|
Paul E. McKenney