aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-06-11net: usb: asix: ax88772: manage PHY PM from MACOleksij Rempel1-31/+12
Take over PHY power management, otherwise PHY framework will try to access ASIX MDIO bus before MAC resume was completed. Fixes: e532a096be0e ("net: usb: asix: ax88772: add phylib support") Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Suggested-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: fix the comments style issuePeng Li1-2/+1
Networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /* Comment... This patch fixes the comments style issues. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: add some required spacesPeng Li1-4/+4
Add spaces required before the open parenthesis '('. Add spaces required after that close brace '}'. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: replace comparison to NULL with "!card->plxbase"Peng Li1-4/+2
According to the chackpatch.pl, comparison to NULL could be written "!card->plxbase". Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: remove redundant initialization for staticsPeng Li1-1/+1
Should not initialise statics to 0. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: move out assignment in if conditionPeng Li1-2/+4
Should not use assignment in if condition. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: fix the code style issue about "foo * bar"Peng Li1-1/+1
Fix the checkpatch error as "foo * bar" and should be "foo *bar". Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: add blank line after declarationsPeng Li1-1/+2
This patch fixes the checkpatch error about missing a blank line after declarations. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: pc300too: remove redundant blank linesPeng Li1-22/+0
This patch removes some redundant blank lines. Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11r8169: avoid link-up interrupt issue on RTL8106e if user enables ASPMHeiner Kallweit1-1/+0
It has been reported that on RTL8106e the link-up interrupt may be significantly delayed if the user enables ASPM L1. Per default ASPM is disabled. The change leaves L1 enabled on the PCIe link (thus still allowing to reach higher package power saving states), but the NIC won't actively trigger it. Reported-by: Koba Ko <koba.ko@canonical.com> Tested-by: Koba Ko <koba.ko@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11nfc: fdp: remove unnecessary labelswengjianfeng1-5/+2
Some labels are meaningless, so we delete them and use the return statement instead of the goto statement. Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@yulong.com> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: Consider dependency on SWITCHDEV moduleAlexandra Winter1-2/+10
Without the SWITCHDEV module, the bridgeport attribute LEARNING_SYNC of the physical device (self) does not provide any functionality. Instead of calling the no-op stub version of the switchdev functions, fail the setting of the attribute with an appropriate message. While at it, also add an error message for the 'not supported by HW' case. Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: shrink TX buffer structJulian Wiedmann2-5/+4
Convert the large boolean array into a bitmap, this substantially reduces the struct's size. While at it also clarify the naming. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: remove TX buffer's pointer to its queueJulian Wiedmann2-6/+4
qeth_tx_complete_buf() is the only remaining user of buf->q, and the callers can easily provide this as a parameter instead. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: remove QAOB's pointer to its TX bufferJulian Wiedmann2-87/+48
Maintaining a pointer inside the aob's user-definable area is fragile and unnecessary. At this stage we only need it to overload the buffer's state field, and to access the buffer's TX queue. The first part is easily solved by tracking the aob's state within the aob itself. This also feels much cleaner and self-contained. For enabling the access to the associated TX queue, we can store the queue's index in the aob. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: consolidate completion of pending TX buffersJulian Wiedmann2-47/+29
With commit 396c100472dd ("s390/qdio: let driver manage the QAOB") a pending TX buffer now has access to its associated QAOB during TX completion processing. We can thus reduce the amount of work & state propagation that needs to be done by qeth_qdio_handle_aob(). Move all this logic into the respective TX completion paths. Doing so even allows us to determine more precise TX_NOTIFY_* values via qeth_compute_cq_notification(aob->aorc, ...). Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: use ethtool_sprintf()Julian Wiedmann1-4/+2
Use a recently introduced helper to fill our ethtool stats strings. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: unify the tracking of active cmds on ccw deviceJulian Wiedmann2-15/+11
We have one field to track _whether_ a cmd is active on a ccw device ('irq_pending'), and one to track _which_ cmd it is ('active_cmd'). Get rid of the irq_pending field, by testing active_cmd for NULL. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: also use TX NAPI for non-IQD devicesJulian Wiedmann2-75/+79
Set scan_threshold = 0 to opt out from the qdio layer's internal tasklet & timer mechanism for TX completions, and replace it with the TX NAPI infrastructure that qeth already uses for IQD devices. This avoids the fragile logic in qdio_check_output_queue(), enables tighter integration and gives us more tuning options via ethtool in the future. For now we continue to apply the same policy as the qdio layer: scan for completions if 32 TX buffers are in use, or after 1 sec. A re-scan is done after 10 sec, but only if no TX interrupt is pending. With scan_threshold = 0 we no longer get TX completion scans from within qdio_get_next_buffers(). So trigger these manually in qeth_poll() and in the RX path switch to the equivalent qdio_inspect_queue(). Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11s390/qeth: count TX completion interruptsJulian Wiedmann3-1/+5
While the qdio layer already tracks the number of HW interrupts for a device, there's value in understanding how many of them have been raised due to our TX completion logic. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: sja1105: implement TX timestamping for SJA1110Vladimir Oltean4-0/+81
The TX timestamping procedure for SJA1105 is a bit unconventional because the transmit procedure itself is unconventional. Control packets (and therefore PTP as well) are transmitted to a specific port in SJA1105 using "management routes" which must be written over SPI to the switch. These are one-shot rules that match by destination MAC address on traffic coming from the CPU port, and select the precise destination port for that packet. So to transmit a packet from NET_TX softirq context, we actually need to defer to a process context so that we can perform that SPI write before we send the packet. The DSA master dev_queue_xmit() runs in process context, and we poll until the switch confirms it took the TX timestamp, then we annotate the skb clone with that TX timestamp. This is why the sja1105 driver does not need an skb queue for TX timestamping. But the SJA1110 is a bit (not much!) more conventional, and you can request 2-step TX timestamping through the DSA header, as well as give the switch a cookie (timestamp ID) which it will give back to you when it has the timestamp. So now we do need a queue for keeping the skb clones until their TX timestamps become available. The interesting part is that the metadata frames from SJA1105 haven't disappeared completely. On SJA1105 they were used as follow-ups which contained RX timestamps, but on SJA1110 they are actually TX completion packets, which contain a variable (up to 32) array of timestamps. Why an array? Because: - not only is the TX timestamp on the egress port being communicated, but also the RX timestamp on the CPU port. Nice, but we don't care about that, so we ignore it. - because a packet could be multicast to multiple egress ports, each port takes its own timestamp, and the TX completion packet contains the individual timestamps on each port. This is unconventional because switches typically have a timestamping FIFO and raise an interrupt, but this one doesn't. So the tagger needs to detect and parse meta frames, and call into the main switch driver, which pairs the timestamps with the skbs in the TX timestamping queue which are waiting for one. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: sja1105: add the RX timestamping procedure for SJA1110Vladimir Oltean4-3/+40
This is really easy, since the full RX timestamp is in the DSA trailer and the tagger code transfers it to SJA1105_SKB_CB(skb)->tstamp, we just need to move it to the skb shared info region. This is as opposed to SJA1105, where the RX timestamp was received in a meta frame (so there needed to be a state machine to pair the 2 packets) and the timestamp was partial (so the packet, once matched with its timestamp, needed to be added to an RX timestamping queue where the PTP aux worker would reconstruct that timestamp). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: add support for the SJA1110 native tagging protocolVladimir Oltean5-1/+18
The SJA1110 has improved a few things compared to SJA1105: - To send a control packet from the host port with SJA1105, one needed to program a one-shot "management route" over SPI. This is no longer true with SJA1110, you can actually send "in-band control extensions" in the packets sent by DSA, these are in fact DSA tags which contain the destination port and switch ID. - When receiving a control packet from the switch with SJA1105, the source port and switch ID were written in bytes 3 and 4 of the destination MAC address of the frame (which was a very poor shot at a DSA header). If the control packet also had an RX timestamp, that timestamp was sent in an actual follow-up packet, so there were reordering concerns on multi-core/multi-queue DSA masters, where the metadata frame with the RX timestamp might get processed before the actual packet to which that timestamp belonged (there is no way to pair a packet to its timestamp other than the order in which they were received). On SJA1110, this is no longer true, control packets have the source port, switch ID and timestamp all in the DSA tags. - Timestamps from the switch were partial: to get a 64-bit timestamp as required by PTP stacks, one would need to take the partial 24-bit or 32-bit timestamp from the packet, then read the current PTP time very quickly, and then patch in the high bits of the current PTP time into the captured partial timestamp, to reconstruct what the full 64-bit timestamp must have been. That is awful because packet processing is done in NAPI context, but reading the current PTP time is done over SPI and therefore needs sleepable context. But it also aggravated a few things: - Not only is there a DSA header in SJA1110, but there is a DSA trailer in fact, too. So DSA needs to be extended to support taggers which have both a header and a trailer. Very unconventional - my understanding is that the trailer exists because the timestamps couldn't be prepared in time for putting them in the header area. - Like SJA1105, not all packets sent to the CPU have the DSA tag added to them, only control packets do: * the ones which match the destination MAC filters/traps in MAC_FLTRES1 and MAC_FLTRES0 * the ones which match FDB entries which have TRAP or TAKETS bits set So we could in theory hack something up to request the switch to take timestamps for all packets that reach the CPU, and those would be DSA-tagged and contain the source port / switch ID by virtue of the fact that there needs to be a timestamp trailer provided. BUT: - The SJA1110 does not parse its own DSA tags in a way that is useful for routing in cross-chip topologies, a la Marvell. And the sja1105 driver already supports cross-chip bridging from the SJA1105 days. It does that by automatically setting up the DSA links as VLAN trunks which contain all the necessary tag_8021q RX VLANs that must be communicated between the switches that span the same bridge. So when using tag_8021q on sja1105, it is possible to have 2 switches with ports sw0p0, sw0p1, sw1p0, sw1p1, and 2 VLAN-unaware bridges br0 and br1, and br0 can take sw0p0 and sw1p0, and br1 can take sw0p1 and sw1p1, and forwarding will happen according to the expected rules of the Linux bridge. We like that, and we don't want that to go away, so as a matter of fact, the SJA1110 tagger still needs to support tag_8021q. So the sja1110 tagger is a hybrid between tag_8021q for data packets, and the native hardware support for control packets. On RX, packets have a 13-byte trailer if they contain an RX timestamp. That trailer is padded in such a way that its byte 8 (the start of the "residence time" field - not parsed by Linux because we don't care) is aligned on a 16 byte boundary. So the padding has a variable length between 0 and 15 bytes. The DSA header contains the offset of the beginning of the padding relative to the beginning of the frame (and the end of the padding is obviously the end of the packet minus 13 bytes, the length of the trailer). So we discard it. Packets which don't have a trailer contain the source port and switch ID information in the header (they are "trap-to-host" packets). Packets which have a trailer contain the source port and switch ID in the trailer. On TX, the destination port mask and switch ID is always in the trailer, so we always need to say in the header that a trailer is present. The header needs a custom EtherType and this was chosen as 0xdadc, after 0xdada which is for Marvell and 0xdadb which is for VLANs in VLAN-unaware mode on SJA1105 (and SJA1110 in fact too). Because we use tag_8021q in concert with the native tagging protocol, control packets will have 2 DSA tags. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: sja1105: make SJA1105_SKB_CB fit a full timestampVladimir Oltean1-1/+1
In SJA1105, RX timestamps for packets sent to the CPU are transmitted in separate follow-up packets (metadata frames). These contain partial timestamps (24 or 32 bits) which are kept in SJA1105_SKB_CB(skb)->meta_tstamp. Thankfully, SJA1110 improved that, and the RX timestamps are now transmitted in-band with the actual packet, in the timestamp trailer. The RX timestamps are now full-width 64 bits. Because we process the RX DSA tags in the rcv() method in the tagger, but we would like to preserve the DSA code structure in that we populate the skb timestamp in the port_rxtstamp() call which only happens later, the implication is that we must somehow pass the 64-bit timestamp from the rcv() method all the way to port_rxtstamp(). We can use the skb->cb for that. Rename the meta_tstamp from struct sja1105_skb_cb from "meta_tstamp" to "tstamp", and increase its size to 64 bits. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: sja1105: allow RX timestamps to be taken on all ports for SJA1110Vladimir Oltean3-10/+22
On SJA1105, there is support for a cascade port which is presumably connected to a downstream SJA1105 switch. The upstream one does not take PTP timestamps for packets received on this port, presumably because the downstream switch already did (and for PTP, it only makes sense for the leaf nodes in a DSA switch tree to do that). I haven't been able to validate that feature in a fully assembled setup, so I am disabling the feature by setting the cascade port to an unused port value (ds->num_ports). In SJA1110, multiple cascade ports are supported, and CASC_PORT became a bit mask from a port number. So when CASC_PORT is set to ds->num_ports (which is 11 on SJA1110), it is actually set to 0b1011, so ports 3, 1 and 0 are configured as cascade ports and we cannot take RX timestamps on them. So we need to introduce a check for SJA1110 and set things differently (to zero there), so that the cascading feature is properly disabled and RX timestamps can be taken on all ports. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: dsa: sja1105: enable the TTEthernet engine on SJA1110Vladimir Oltean1-0/+2
As opposed to SJA1105 where there are parts with TTEthernet and parts without, in SJA1110 all parts support it, but it must be enabled in the static config. So enable it unconditionally. We use it for the tc-taprio and tc-gate offload. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: hns3: add debugfs support for ptp infoHuazhong Tan3-2/+67
Add a debugfs interface for dumping ptp information, which is helpful for debugging. Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11net: hns3: add support for PTPHuazhong Tan11-6/+806
Adds PTP support for HNS3 ethernet driver. Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-06-11Merge tag 'drm-fixes-2021-06-11' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drmLinus Torvalds19-79/+232
Pull drm fixes from Dave Airlie: "Another week of fixes, nothing too crazy, but a few all over the place. Two locking fixes in the core/ttm area, a couple of small driver fixes (radeon, sun4i, mcde, vc4). Then msm and amdgpu have a set of fixes each, mostly for smaller things, though the msm has a DSI fix for a black screen. I haven't seen any intel fixes this week so they may have a few that may or may not wait for next week. drm: - auth locking fix ttm: - locking fix amdgpu: - Use kvzmalloc in amdgu_bo_create - Use drm_dbg_kms for reporting failure to get a GEM FB - Fix some register offsets for Sienna Cichlid - Fix fall-through warning radeon: - memcpy_to/from_io fixes msm: - NULL ptr deref fix - CP_PROTECT reg programming fix - incorrect register shift fix - DSI blank screen fix sun4i: - hdmi output probing fix mcde: - DSI pipeline calc fix vc4: - out of bounds fix" * tag 'drm-fixes-2021-06-11' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm: drm/msm/dsi: Stash away calculated vco frequency on recalc drm: Lock pointer access in drm_master_release() drm/mcde: Fix off by 10^3 in calculation drm/msm/a6xx: avoid shadow NULL reference in failure path drm/msm/a6xx: fix incorrectly set uavflagprd_inv field for A650 drm/msm/a6xx: update/fix CP_PROTECT initialization radeon: use memcpy_to/fromio for UVD fw upload drm/amd/pm: Fix fall-through warning for Clang drm/amdgpu: Fix incorrect register offsets for Sienna Cichlid drm/amdgpu: Use drm_dbg_kms for reporting failure to get a GEM FB drm/amdgpu: switch kzalloc to kvzalloc in amdgpu_bo_create drm/msm: Init mm_list before accessing it for use_vram path drm: Fix use-after-free read in drm_getunique() drm/vc4: fix vc4_atomic_commit_tail() logic drm/ttm: fix deref of bo->ttm without holding the lock v2 drm/sun4i: dw-hdmi: Make HDMI PHY into a platform device
2021-06-11drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Improve probe errors with dev_err_probe()Douglas Anderson1-18/+13
As I was testing to make sure that the DEFER path worked well with my patch series, I got tired of seeing this scary message in my logs just because the panel needed to defer: [drm:ti_sn_bridge_probe] *ERROR* could not find any panel node Let's use dev_err_probe() which nicely quiets this error and also simplifies the code a tiny bit. We'll also update other places in the file which can use dev_err_probe(). Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.10.I24bba069e63b1eea84443eef0c8535fd032a6311@changeid
2021-06-11drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Don't read EDID blob over DDCDouglas Anderson1-22/+0
This is really just a revert of commit 58074b08c04a ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Read EDID blob over DDC"), resolving conflicts. The old code failed to read the EDID properly in a very important case: before the bridge's pre_enable() was called. The way things need to work: 1. Read the EDID. 2. Based on the EDID, decide on video settings and pixel clock. 3. Enable the bridge w/ the desired settings. The way things were working: 1. Try to read the EDID but fail; fall back to hardcoded values. 2. Based on hardcoded values, decide on video settings and pixel clock. 3. Enable the bridge w/ the desired settings. 4. Try again to read the EDID, it works now! 5. Realize that the hardcoded settings weren't quite right. 6. Disable / reenable the bridge w/ the right settings. The reasons for the failures were twofold: a) Since we never ran the bridge chip's pre-enable then we never set the bit to ignore HPD. This meant the bridge chip didn't even _try_ to go out on the bus and communicate with the panel. b) Even if we fixed things to ignore HPD, the EDID still wouldn't read if the panel wasn't on. Instead of reverting the code, we could fix it to set the HPD bit and also power on the panel. However, it also works nicely to just let the panel code read the EDID. Now that we've split the driver up we can expose the DDC AUX channel bus to the panel node. The panel can take charge of reading the EDID. NOTE: in order for things to work, anyone that needs to read the EDID will need to instantiate their panel using the new DP AUX bus (AKA by listing their panel under the "aux-bus" node of the bridge chip in the device tree). In the future if we want to use the bridge chip to provide a full external DP port (which won't have a panel) then we will have to conditinally add EDID reading back in. Suggested-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.9.I9330684c25f65bb318eff57f0616500f83eac3cc@changeid
2021-06-11drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add support for the DP AUX busDouglas Anderson2-0/+7
We want to provide our panel with access to the DP AUX channel. The way to do this is to let our panel be a child of ours using the fancy new DP AUX bus support. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.8.Ib5fe0638da85800141ce141bb8e441c5f25438d4@changeid
2021-06-11drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Promote the AUX channel to its own sub-devDouglas Anderson1-19/+51
On its own, this change looks a little strange and doesn't do too much useful. To understand why we're doing this we need to look forward to future patches where we're going to probe our panel using the new DP AUX bus. See the patch ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add support for the DP AUX bus"). Let's think about the set of steps we'll want to happen when we have the DP AUX bus: 1. We'll create the DP AUX bus. 2. We'll populate the devices on the DP AUX bus (AKA our panel). 3. For setting up the bridge-related functions of ti-sn65dsi86 we'll need to get a reference to the panel. If we do #1 - #3 in a single probe call things _mostly_ will work, but it won't be massively robust. Let's explore. First let's think of the easy case of no -EPROBE_DEFER. In that case in step #2 when we populate the devices on the DP AUX bus it will actually try probing the panel right away. Since the panel probe doesn't defer then in step #3 we'll get a reference to the panel and we're golden. Second, let's think of the case when the panel returns -EPROBE_DEFER. In that case step #2 won't synchronously create the panel (it'll just add the device to the defer list to do it later). Step #3 will fail to get the panel and the bridge sub-device will return -EPROBE_DEFER. We'll depopulate the DP AUX bus. Later we'll try the whole sequence again. Presumably the panel will eventually stop returning -EPROBE_DEFER and we'll go back to the first case where things were golden. So this case is OK too even if it's a bit ugly that we have to keep creating / deleting the AUX bus over and over. So where is the problem? As I said, it's mostly about robustness. I don't believe that step #2 (creating the sub-devices) is really guaranteed to be synchronous. This is evidenced by the fact that it's allowed to "succeed" by just sticking the device on the deferred list. If anything about the process changes in Linux as a whole and step #2 just kicks off the probe of the DP AUX endpoints (our panel) in the background then we'd be in trouble because we might never get the panel in step #3. Adding an extra sub-device means we just don't need to worry about it. We'll create the sub-device for the DP AUX bus and it won't go away until the whole ti-sn65dsi86 driver goes away. If the bridge sub-device defers (maybe because it can't find the panel) that won't depopulate the DP AUX bus and so we don't need to worry about it. NOTE: there's a little bit of a trick here. Though the AUX channel can run without the MIPI-to-eDP bits of the code, the MIPI-to-eDP bits can't run without the AUX channel. We could come up a complicated signaling scheme (have the MIPI-to-eDP bits return EPROBE_DEFER for a while or wait on some sort of completion), but it seems simple enough to just not even bother creating the bridge device until the AUX channel probes. That's what we'll do. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.7.If89144992cb9d900f8c91a8d1817dbe00f543720@changeid
2021-06-11drm/panel: panel-simple: Stash DP AUX bus; allow using it for DDCDouglas Anderson1-6/+12
If panel-simple is instantiated as a DP AUX bus endpoint then we have access to the DP AUX bus. Let's stash it in the panel-simple structure, leaving it NULL for the cases where the panel is instantiated in other ways. If we happen to have access to the DP AUX bus and we weren't provided the ddc-i2c-bus in some other manner, let's use the DP AUX bus for it. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.6.I18e60221f6d048d14d6c50a770b15f356fa75092@changeid
2021-06-11drm/panel: panel-simple: Allow panel-simple be a DP AUX endpoint deviceDouglas Anderson2-4/+49
The panel-simple driver can already have devices instantiated as platform devices or MIPI DSI devices. Let's add a 3rd way to instantiate it: as DP AUX endpoint devices. At the moment there is no benefit to instantiating it in this way, but: - In the next patch we'll give it access to the DDC channel via the DP AUX bus. - Possibly in the future we may use this channel to configure the backlight. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.5.Iada41f76a7342354bae929d0bb3ceba40f27f0ea@changeid
2021-06-11drm: Introduce the DP AUX busDouglas Anderson3-0/+333
Historically "simple" eDP panels have been handled by panel-simple which is a basic platform_device. In the device tree, the panel node was at the top level and not connected to anything else. Let's change it so that, instead, panels can be represented as being children of the "DP AUX bus". Essentially we're saying that the hierarchy that we're going to represent is the "control" connections between devices. The DP AUX bus is a control bus provided by an eDP controller (the parent) and consumed by a device like a panel (the child). The primary incentive here is to cleanly provide the panel driver the ability to communicate over the AUX bus while handling lifetime issues properly. The panel driver may want the AUX bus for controlling the backlight or querying the panel's EDID. The idea for this bus's design was hashed out over IRC [1]. [1] https://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/?channel=dri-devel&date=2021-05-11 Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org> Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210611101711.v10.4.I787c9ba09ed5ce12500326ded73a4f7c9265b1b3@changeid
2021-06-11Revert "drm/i915/display: Drop FIXME about turn off infoframes"José Roberto de Souza1-0/+1
Looks this FIXME is still valid as we need a way to tell LSPCON to stop sending infoframes, so reverting it. This reverts commit 3f409e4cd579b287a6c41d017e62c392f7997193. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610194527.84997-1-jose.souza@intel.com
2021-06-11mtd: Convert list_for_each to entry variantZou Wei1-4/+1
convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() where applicable. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/1623155699-61935-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
2021-06-11gpio: idt3243x: Fix return value check in idt_gpio_probe()Wei Yongjun1-4/+4
In case of error, the function devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname() returns ERR_PTR() and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should be replaced with IS_ERR(). Fixes: 4195926aedca ("gpio: Add support for IDT 79RC3243x GPIO controller") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
2021-06-11mtd: inftl: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-13/+2
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610022850.15397-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: amd76xrom: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-4/+2
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610022631.15344-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: ck804xrom: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-5/+3
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610022416.15291-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: esb2rom: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-4/+3
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610022239.15238-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: ichxrom: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-4/+2
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610022100.15185-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: sun_uflash: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-3/+1
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610021400.15132-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: mtdoops: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-3/+1
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610021201.15076-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: rawnand: atmel: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-3/+1
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610020958.15023-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: rawnand: sunxi: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-3/+1
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610020620.14970-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: nftl: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-4/+1
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610020130.14917-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
2021-06-11mtd: rfd_ftl: remove unnecessary oom messageZhen Lei1-4/+1
Fixes scripts/checkpatch.pl warning: WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message Remove it can help us save a bit of memory. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210610015052.14864-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com