aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/afs/vl_alias.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-10-16afs: Add tracing for cell refcount and active user countDavid Howells1-4/+4
Add a tracepoint to log the cell refcount and active user count and pass in a reason code through various functions that manipulate these counters. Additionally, a helper function, afs_see_cell(), is provided to log interesting places that deal with a cell without actually doing any accounting directly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-10-16afs: Fix cell refcounting by splitting the usage counterDavid Howells1-4/+4
Management of the lifetime of afs_cell struct has some problems due to the usage counter being used to determine whether objects of that type are in use in addition to whether anyone might be interested in the structure. This is made trickier by cell objects being cached for a period of time in case they're quickly reused as they hold the result of a setup process that may be slow (DNS lookups, AFS RPC ops). Problems include the cached root volume from alias resolution pinning its parent cell record, rmmod occasionally hanging and occasionally producing assertion failures. Fix this by splitting the count of active users from the struct reference count. Things then work as follows: (1) The cell cache keeps +1 on the cell's activity count and this has to be dropped before the cell can be removed. afs_manage_cell() tries to exchange the 1 to a 0 with the cells_lock write-locked, and if successful, the record is removed from the net->cells. (2) One struct ref is 'owned' by the activity count. That is put when the active count is reduced to 0 (final_destruction label). (3) A ref can be held on a cell whilst it is queued for management on a work queue without confusing the active count. afs_queue_cell() is added to wrap this. (4) The queue's ref is dropped at the end of the management. This is split out into a separate function, afs_manage_cell_work(). (5) The root volume record is put after a cell is removed (at the final_destruction label) rather then in the RCU destruction routine. (6) Volumes hold struct refs, but aren't active users. (7) Both counts are displayed in /proc/net/afs/cells. There are some management function changes: (*) afs_put_cell() now just decrements the refcount and triggers the RCU destruction if it becomes 0. It no longer sets a timer to have the manager do this. (*) afs_use_cell() and afs_unuse_cell() are added to increase and decrease the active count. afs_unuse_cell() sets the management timer. (*) afs_queue_cell() is added to queue a cell with approprate refs. There are also some other fixes: (*) Don't let /proc/net/afs/cells access a cell's vllist if it's NULL. (*) Make sure that candidate cells in lookups are properly destroyed rather than being simply kfree'd. This ensures the bits it points to are destroyed also. (*) afs_dec_cells_outstanding() is now called in cell destruction rather than at "final_destruction". This ensures that cell->net is still valid to the end of the destructor. (*) As a consequence of the previous two changes, move the increment of net->cells_outstanding that was at the point of insertion into the tree to the allocation routine to correctly balance things. Fixes: 989782dcdc91 ("afs: Overhaul cell database management") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-09afs: Fix debugging statements with %px to be %pDavid Howells1-1/+1
Fix a couple of %px to be %p in debugging statements. Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept") Fixes: 8a070a964877 ("afs: Detect cell aliases 1 - Cells with root volumes") Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2020-06-09afs: Fix use of BUG()David Howells1-1/+2
Fix afs_compare_addrs() to use WARN_ON(1) instead of BUG() and return 1 (ie. srx_a > srx_b). There's no point trying to put actual error handling in as this should not occur unless a new transport address type is allowed by AFS. And even if it does, in this particular case, it'll just never match unknown types of addresses. This BUG() was more of a 'you need to add a case here' indicator. Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2020-06-04afs: Reorganise volume and server trees to be rooted on the cellDavid Howells1-7/+7
Reorganise afs_volume objects such that they're in a tree keyed on volume ID, rooted at on an afs_cell object rather than being in multiple trees, each of which is rooted on an afs_server object. afs_server structs become per-cell and acquire a pointer to the cell. The process of breaking a callback then starts with finding the server by its network address, following that to the cell and then looking up each volume ID in the volume tree. This is simpler than the afs_vol_interest/afs_cb_interest N:M mapping web and allows those structs and the code for maintaining them to be simplified or removed. It does make a couple of things a bit more tricky, though: (1) Operations now start with a volume, not a server, so there can be more than one answer as to whether or not the server we'll end up using supports the FS.InlineBulkStatus RPC. (2) CB RPC operations that specify the server UUID. There's still a tree of servers by UUID on the afs_net struct, but the UUIDs in it aren't guaranteed unique. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04afs: Add a tracepoint to track the lifetime of the afs_volume structDavid Howells1-4/+5
Add a tracepoint to track the lifetime of the afs_volume struct. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04afs: Detect cell aliases 3 - YFS Cells with a canonical cell name opDavid Howells1-0/+58
YFS Volume Location servers have an operation by which the cell name may be queried. Use this to find out what a YFS server thinks the canonical cell name should be. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04afs: Detect cell aliases 2 - Cells with no root volumesDavid Howells1-1/+89
Implement the second phase of cell alias detection. This part handles alias detection for cells that don't have root.cell volumes and so we have to find some other volume or fileserver to query. We take the first volume from each such cell and attempt to look it up in the new cell. If found, we compare the records, if they are the same, we judge the cell names to be aliases. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04afs: Detect cell aliases 1 - Cells with root volumesDavid Howells1-0/+235
Put in the first phase of cell alias detection. This part handles alias detection for cells that have root.cell volumes (which is expected to be likely). When a cell becomes newly active, it is probed for its root.cell volume, and if it has one, this volume is compared against other root.cell volumes to find out if the list of fileserver UUIDs have any in common - and if that's the case, do the address lists of those fileservers have any addresses in common. If they do, the new cell is adjudged to be an alias of the old cell and the old cell is used instead. Comparing is aided by the server list in struct afs_server_list being sorted in UUID order and the addresses in the fileserver address lists being sorted in address order. The cell then retains the afs_volume object for the root.cell volume, even if it's not mounted for future alias checking. This necessary because: (1) Whilst fileservers have UUIDs that are meant to be globally unique, in practice they are not because cells get cloned without changing the UUIDs - so afs_server records need to be per cell. (2) Sometimes the DNS is used to make cell aliases - but if we don't know they're the same, we may end up with multiple superblocks and multiple afs_server records for the same thing, impairing our ability to deliver callback notifications of third party changes (3) The fileserver RPC API doesn't contain the cell name, so it can't tell us which cell it's notifying and can't see that a change made to to one cell should notify the same client that's also accessed as the other cell. Reported-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>