aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/ctree.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-10-04Merge branch 'cleanup/blocksize-diet-part1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linusChris Mason1-32/+22
2014-10-04Merge branch 'cleanup/misc-for-3.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linusChris Mason1-5/+3
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Conflicts: fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
2014-10-03btrfs: fix shadow warning on cmpFabian Frederick1-4/+4
cmp was declared twice in btrfs_compare_trees resulting in a shadow warning. This patch renames second internal variable. Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-10-02btrfs: move checks for DUMMY_ROOT into a helperDavid Sterba1-3/+2
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: new define for the inline extent data startDavid Sterba1-2/+1
Use a common definition for the inline data start so we don't have to open-code it and introduce bugs like "Btrfs: fix wrong max inline data size limit" fixed. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: remove blocksize from btrfs_alloc_free_block and renameDavid Sterba1-15/+11
Rename to btrfs_alloc_tree_block as it fits to the alloc/find/free + _tree_block family. The parameter blocksize was set to the metadata block size, directly or indirectly. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: remove unused parameter blocksize from btrfs_find_tree_blockDavid Sterba1-7/+5
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: remove parameter blocksize from read_tree_blockDavid Sterba1-7/+3
We know the tree block size, no need to pass it around. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-10-02btrfs: remove unused parameter from readahead_tree_blockDavid Sterba1-3/+3
The parent_transid parameter has been unused since its introduction in ca7a79ad8dbe2466 ("Pass down the expected generation number when reading tree blocks"). In reada_tree_block, it was even wrongly set to leafsize. Transid check is done in the proper read and readahead ignores errors. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2014-09-17Btrfs: make btrfs_search_forward return with nodes unlockedFilipe Manana1-4/+7
None of the uses of btrfs_search_forward() need to have the path nodes (level >= 1) read locked, only the leaf needs to be locked while the caller processes it. Therefore make it return a path with all nodes unlocked, except for the leaf. This change is motivated by the observation that during a file fsync we repeatdly call btrfs_search_forward() and process the returned leaf while upper nodes of the returned path (level >= 1) are read locked, which unnecessarily blocks other tasks that want to write to the same fs/subvol btree. Therefore instead of modifying the fsync code to unlock all nodes with level >= 1 immediately after calling btrfs_search_forward(), change btrfs_search_forward() to do it, so that it benefits all callers. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: avoid unnecessary switch of path locks to blocking modeFilipe Manana1-2/+1
If we need to cow a node, increase the write lock level and retry the tree search, there's no point of changing the node locks in our path to blocking mode, as we only waste time and unnecessarily wake up other tasks waiting on the spinning locks (just to block them again shortly after) because we release our path before repeating the tree search. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17Btrfs: unlock nodes earlier when inserting items in a btreeFilipe Manana1-6/+6
In ctree.c:setup_items_for_insert(), we can unlock all nodes in our path before we process the leaf (shift items and data, adjust data offsets, etc). This allows for better btree concurrency, as we're often holding a write lock on at least the node at level 1. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-09-17btrfs: use nodesize everywhere, kill leafsizeDavid Sterba1-9/+9
The nodesize and leafsize were never of different values. Unify the usage and make nodesize the one. Cleanup the redundant checks and helpers. Shaves a few bytes from .text: text data bss dec hex filename 852418 24560 23112 900090 dbbfa btrfs.ko.before 851074 24584 23112 898770 db6d2 btrfs.ko.after Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-08-15Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always use no_quotaJosef Bacik1-10/+10
Before I extended the no_quota arg to btrfs_dec/inc_ref because I didn't understand how snapshot delete was using it and assumed that we needed the quota operations there. With Mark's work this has turned out to be not the case, we _always_ need to use no_quota for btrfs_dec/inc_ref, so just drop the argument and make __btrfs_mod_ref call it's process function with no_quota set always. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: fix leaf corruption after __btrfs_drop_extentsLiu Bo1-0/+18
Several reports about leaf corruption has been floating on the list, one of them points to __btrfs_drop_extents(), and we find that the leaf becomes corrupted after __btrfs_drop_extents(), it's really a rare case but it does exist. The problem turns out to be btrfs_next_leaf() called in __btrfs_drop_extents(). So in btrfs_next_leaf(), we release the current path to re-search the last key of the leaf for locating next leaf, and we've taken it into account that there might be balance operations between leafs during this 'unlock and re-lock' dance, so we check the path again and advance it if there are now more items available. But things are a bit different if that last key happens to be removed and balance gets a bigger key as the last one, and btrfs_search_slot will return it with ret > 0, IOW, nothing change in this leaf except the new last key, then we think we're okay because there is no more item balanced in, fine, we thinks we can go to the next leaf. However, we should return that bigger key, otherwise we deserve leaf corruption, for example, in endio, skipping that key means that __btrfs_drop_extents() thinks it has dropped all extent matched the required range and finish_ordered_io can safely insert a new extent, but it actually doesn't and ends up a leaf corruption. One may be asking that why our locking on extent io tree doesn't work as expected, ie. it should avoid this kind of race situation. But in __btrfs_drop_extents(), we don't always find extents which are included within our locking range, IOW, extents can start before our searching start, in this case locking on extent io tree doesn't protect us from the race. This takes the special case into account. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: ensure btrfs_prev_leaf doesn't miss 1 itemFilipe Manana1-1/+11
We might have had an item with the previous key in the tree right before we released our path. And after we released our path, that item might have been pushed to the first slot (0) of the leaf we were holding due to a tree balance. Alternatively, an item with the previous key can exist as the only element of a leaf (big fat item). Therefore account for these 2 cases, so that our callers (like btrfs_previous_item) don't miss an existing item with a key matching the previous key we computed above. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting codeJosef Bacik1-0/+4
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself, hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: rework qgroup accountingJosef Bacik1-40/+5
Currently qgroups account for space by intercepting delayed ref updates to fs trees. It does this by adding sequence numbers to delayed ref updates so that it can figure out how the tree looked before the update so we can adjust the counters properly. The problem with this is that it does not allow delayed refs to be merged, so if you say are defragging an extent with 5k snapshots pointing to it we will thrash the delayed ref lock because we need to go back and manually merge these things together. Instead we want to process quota changes when we know they are going to happen, like when we first allocate an extent, we free a reference for an extent, we add new references etc. This patch accomplishes this by only adding qgroup operations for real ref changes. We only modify the sequence number when we need to lookup roots for bytenrs, this reduces the amount of churn on the sequence number and allows us to merge delayed refs as we add them most of the time. This patch encompasses a bunch of architectural changes 1) qgroup ref operations: instead of tracking qgroup operations through the delayed refs we simply add new ref operations whenever we notice that we need to when we've modified the refs themselves. 2) tree mod seq: we no longer have this separation of major/minor counters. this makes the sequence number stuff much more sane and we can remove some locking that was needed to protect the counter. 3) delayed ref seq: we now read the tree mod seq number and use that as our sequence. This means each new delayed ref doesn't have it's own unique sequence number, rather whenever we go to lookup backrefs we inc the sequence number so we can make sure to keep any new operations from screwing up our world view at that given point. This allows us to merge delayed refs during runtime. With all of these changes the delayed ref stuff is a little saner and the qgroup accounting stuff no longer goes negative in some cases like it was before. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-06-09Btrfs: use bitfield instead of integer data type for the some variants in btrfs_rootMiao Xie1-11/+14
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07Btrfs: hold the commit_root_sem when getting the commit root during sendJosef Bacik1-0/+6
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just accessing root->commit_root. We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access root->commit_root under the commit root sem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06Btrfs: remove transaction from sendJosef Bacik1-88/+0
Lets try this again. We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe. This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit which is being blocked by the send. So fix this by making sure looking at the commit roots is always going to be consistent. We do this by keeping track of which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once. Then make sure we take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots. Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the backref walking code to screw up sometimes. With this patch we no longer deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases. Thanks, Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-10Btrfs: correctly determine if blocks are shared in btrfs_compare_treesFilipe Manana1-1/+10
Just comparing the pointers (logical disk addresses) of the btree nodes is not completely bullet proof, we have to check if their generation numbers match too. It is guaranteed that a COW operation will result in a block with a different logical disk address than the original block's address, but over time we can reuse that former logical disk address. For example, creating a 2Gb filesystem on a loop device, and having a script running in a loop always updating the access timestamp of a file, resulted in the same logical disk address being reused for the same fs btree block in about only 4 minutes. This could make us skip entire subtrees when doing an incremental send (which is currently the only user of btrfs_compare_trees). However the odds of getting 2 blocks at the same tree level, with the same logical disk address, equal first slot keys and different generations, should hopefully be very low. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-01-29Btrfs: fix btrfs_search_slot_for_read backwards iterationFilipe David Borba Manana1-1/+3
If the current path's leaf slot is 0, we do search for the previous leaf (via btrfs_prev_leaf) and set the new path's leaf slot to a value corresponding to the number of items - 1 of the former leaf. Fix this by using the slot set by btrfs_prev_leaf, decrementing it by 1 if it's equal to the leaf's number of items. Use of btrfs_search_slot_for_read() for backward iteration is used in particular by the send feature, which could miss items when the input leaf has less items than its previous leaf. This could be reproduced by running btrfs/007 from xfstests in a loop. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: fix to search previous metadata extent item since skinny metadataWang Shilong1-0/+43
There is a bug that using btrfs_previous_item() to search metadata extent item. This is because in btrfs_previous_item(), we need type match, however, since skinny metada was introduced by josef, we may mix this two types. So just use btrfs_previous_item() is not working right. To keep btrfs_previous_item() like normal tree search, i introduce another function btrfs_previous_extent_item(). Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: reduce btree node locking duration on item updateFilipe David Borba Manana1-9/+14
If we do a btree search with the goal of updating an existing item without changing its size (ins_len == 0 and cow == 1), then we never need to hold locks on upper level nodes (even when slot == 0) after we COW their child nodes/leaves, as we won't have node splits or merges in this scenario (that is, no key additions, removals or shifts on any nodes or leaves). Therefore release the locks immediately after COWing the child nodes/leaves while navigating the btree, even if their parent slot is 0, instead of returning a path to the caller with those nodes locked, which would get released only when the caller releases or frees the path (or if it calls btrfs_unlock_up_safe). This is a common scenario, for example when updating inode items in fs trees and block group items in the extent tree. The following benchmarks were performed on a quad core machine with 32Gb of ram, using a leaf/node size of 4Kb (to generate deeper fs trees more quickly). sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=131072 --file-total-size=8G \ --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \ --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run] Before this change: 49.85Mb/s (average of 5 runs) After this change: 50.38Mb/s (average of 5 runs) Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefixFrank Holton1-8/+8
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: Frank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: fix tree mod loggingFilipe David Borba Manana1-89/+296
While running the test btrfs/004 from xfstests in a loop, it failed about 1 time out of 20 runs in my desktop. The failure happened in the backref walking part of the test, and the test's error message was like this: btrfs/004 93s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/004.out 2013-11-26 18:25:29.263333714 +0000 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad 2013-12-10 15:25:10.327518516 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ QA output created by 004 *** test backref walking -*** done +unexpected output from + /home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1 +expected inum: 405, expected address: 454656, file: /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/d6/d3d/d156/fce, got: + ... (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/004.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: btrfs/004 Failures: btrfs/004 Failed 1 of 1 tests But immediately after the test finished, the btrfs inspect-internal command returned the expected output: $ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1 inode 405 offset 454656 root 258 inode 405 offset 454656 root 5 It turned out this was because the btrfs_search_old_slot() calls performed during backref walking (backref.c:__resolve_indirect_ref) were not finding anything. The reason for this turned out to be that the tree mod logging code was not logging some node multi-step operations atomically, therefore btrfs_search_old_slot() callers iterated often over an incomplete tree that wasn't fully consistent with any tree state from the past. Besides missing items, this often (but not always) resulted in -EIO errors during old slot searches, reported in dmesg like this: [ 4299.933936] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 4299.933949] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 23190 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1343 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]() [ 4299.933950] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep rfcomm bluetooth parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc joydev snd_hda_codec_h [ 4299.933977] CPU: 0 PID: 23190 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70 [ 4299.933978] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 4299.933979] 000000000000053f ffff8806f3fd98f8 ffffffff8176d284 0000000000000007 [ 4299.933982] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f3fd9938 ffffffff8104a81c ffff880659c64b70 [ 4299.933984] ffff880659c643d0 ffff8806599233d8 ffff880701e2e938 0000160000000000 [ 4299.933987] Call Trace: [ 4299.933991] [<ffffffff8176d284>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76 [ 4299.933994] [<ffffffff8104a81c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 4299.933997] [<ffffffff8104a86a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 4299.934003] [<ffffffffa065d3bb>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934005] [<ffffffff81775f3b>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2b/0x50 [ 4299.934010] [<ffffffffa0655001>] ? __tree_mod_log_search+0x81/0xc0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934019] [<ffffffffa06dd9b0>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x130/0x5f0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934027] [<ffffffffa06a21f1>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934034] [<ffffffffa06de39c>] find_parent_nodes+0x1fc/0xe40 [btrfs] [ 4299.934042] [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934048] [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934056] [<ffffffffa06df980>] iterate_extent_inodes+0xe0/0x250 [btrfs] [ 4299.934058] [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50 [ 4299.934065] [<ffffffffa06dfb82>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934071] [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs] [ 4299.934078] [<ffffffffa06b7015>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf65/0x1f60 [btrfs] [ 4299.934080] [<ffffffff811658b8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x278/0xb00 [ 4299.934083] [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40 [ 4299.934085] [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0 [ 4299.934088] [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570 [ 4299.934090] [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6 [ 4299.934093] [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 4299.934096] [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13 [ 4299.934098] [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0 [ 4299.934100] [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 4299.934102] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 4299.934102] [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 4299.934104] ---[ end trace 48f0cfc902491414 ]--- [ 4299.934378] btrfs bad fsid on block 0 These tree mod log operations that must be performed atomically, tree_mod_log_free_eb, tree_mod_log_eb_copy, tree_mod_log_insert_root and tree_mod_log_insert_move, used to be performed atomically before the following commit: c8cc6341653721b54760480b0d0d9b5f09b46741 (Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC for the tree mod log allocations) That change removed the atomicity of such operations. This patch restores the atomicity while still not doing the GFP_ATOMIC allocations of tree_mod_elem structures, so it has to do the allocations using GFP_NOFS before acquiring the mod log lock. This issue has been experienced by several users recently, such as for example: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg28574.html After running the btrfs/004 test for 679 consecutive iterations with this patch applied, I didn't ran into the issue anymore. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: return immediately if tree log mod is not necessaryFilipe David Borba Manana1-1/+1
In ctree.c:tree_mod_log_set_node_key() we were calling __tree_mod_log_insert_key() even when the modification doesn't need to be logged. This would allocate a tree_mod_elem structure, fill it and pass it to __tree_mod_log_insert(), which would just acquire the tree mod log write lock and then free the tree_mod_elem structure and return (that is, a no-op). Therefore call tree_mod_log_insert() instead of __tree_mod_log_insert() which just returns immediately if the modification doesn't need to be logged (without allocating the structure, fill it, acquire write lock, free structure). Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: more efficient push_leaf_rightFilipe David Borba Manana1-0/+13
Currently when finding the leaf to insert a key into a btree, if the leaf doesn't have enough space to store the item we attempt to move off some items from our leaf to its right neighbor leaf, and if this fails to create enough free space in our leaf, we try to move off more items to the left neighbor leaf as well. When trying to move off items to the right neighbor leaf, if it has enough room to store the new key but not not enough room to move off at least one item from our target leaf, __push_leaf_right returns 1 and we have to attempt to move items to the left neighbor (push_leaf_left function) without touching the right neighbor leaf. For the case where the right leaf has enough room to store at least 1 item from our leaf, we end up modifying (and dirtying) both our leaf and the right leaf. This is non-optimal for the case where the new key is greater than any key in our target leaf because it can be inserted at slot 0 of the right neighbor leaf and we don't need to touch our leaf at all nor to attempt to move off items to the left neighbor leaf. Therefore this change just selects the right neighbor leaf as our new target leaf if it has enough room for the new key without modifying our initial target leaf - we do this only if the new key is higher than any key in the initial target leaf. While running the following test, push_leaf_right was called by split_leaf 4802 times. Out of those 4802 calls, for 2571 calls (53.5%) we hit this special case (right leaf has enough room and new key is higher than any key in the initial target leaf). Test: sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=5G \ --file-test-mode=[seqwr|rndwr] --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \ --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run] Results: sequential writes Throughput before this change: 65.71Mb/sec (average of 10 runs) Throughput after this change: 66.58Mb/sec (average of 10 runs) random writes Throughput before this change: 10.75Mb/sec (average of 10 runs) Throughput after this change: 11.56Mb/sec (average of 10 runs) Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: try harder to avoid btree node splitsFilipe David Borba Manana1-6/+14
When attempting to move items from our target leaf to its neighbor leaves (right and left), we only need to free data_size - free_space bytes from our leaf in order to add the new item (which has size of data_size bytes). Therefore attempt to move items to the right and left leaves if they have at least data_size - free_space bytes free, instead of data_size bytes free. After 5 runs of the following test, I got a smaller number of btree node splits overall: sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=5G \ --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 \ --file-block-size=8192 --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync Before this change: * 6171 splits (average of 5 test runs) * 61.508Mb/sec of throughput (average of 5 test runs) After this change: * 6036 splits (average of 5 test runs) * 63.533Mb/sec of throughput (average of 5 test runs) An ideal test would not just have multiple threads/processes writing to a file (insertion of file extent items) but also do other operations that result in insertion of items with varied sizes, like file/directory creations, creation of links, symlinks, xattrs, etc. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28btrfs: expand btrfs_find_item() to include find_orphan_item functionalityKelley Nielsen1-13/+13
This is the third step in bootstrapping the btrfs_find_item interface. The function find_orphan_item(), in orphan.c, is similar to the two functions already replaced by the new interface. It uses two parameters, which are already present in the interface, and is nearly identical to the function brought in in the previous patch. Replace the two calls to find_orphan_item() with calls to btrfs_find_item(), with the defined objectid and type that was used internally by find_orphan_item(), a null path, and a null key. Add a test for a null path to btrfs_find_item, and if it passes, allocate and free the path. Finally, remove find_orphan_item(). Signed-off-by: Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28btrfs: expand btrfs_find_item() to include find_root_ref functionalityKelley Nielsen1-2/+8
This patch is the second step in bootstrapping the btrfs_find_item interface. The btrfs_find_root_ref() is similar to the former __inode_info(); it accepts four of its parameters, and duplicates the first half of its functionality. Replace the one former call to btrfs_find_root_ref() with a call to btrfs_find_item(), along with the defined key type that was used internally by btrfs_find_root ref, and a null found key. In btrfs_find_item(), add a test for the null key at the place where the functionality of btrfs_find_root_ref() ends; btrfs_find_item() then returns if the test passes. Finally, remove btrfs_find_root_ref(). Signed-off-by: Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28btrfs: bootstrap generic btrfs_find_item interfaceKelley Nielsen1-0/+37
There are many btrfs functions that manually search the tree for an item. They all reimplement the same mechanism and differ in the conditions that they use to find the item. __inode_info() is one such example. Zach Brown proposed creating a new interface to take the place of these functions. This patch is the first step to creating the interface. A new function, btrfs_find_item, has been added to ctree.c and prototyped in ctree.h. It is identical to __inode_info, except that the order of the parameters has been rearranged to more closely those of similar functions elsewhere in the code (now, root and path come first, then the objectid, offset and type, and the key to be filled in last). __inode_info's callers have been set to call this new function instead, and __inode_info itself has been removed. Signed-off-by: Kelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-28Btrfs: incompatible format change to remove hole extentsJosef Bacik1-2/+1
Btrfs has always had these filler extent data items for holes in inodes. This has made somethings very easy, like logging hole punches and sending hole punches. However for large holey files these extent data items are pure overhead. So add an incompatible feature to no longer add hole extents to reduce the amount of metadata used by these sort of files. This has a few changes for logging and send obviously since they will need to detect holes and log/send the holes if there are any. I've tested this thoroughly with xfstests and it doesn't cause any issues with and without the incompat format set. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2013-11-11btrfs: Fix checkpatch.pl warning of spacing issuesDulshani Gunawardhana1-1/+1
Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the kernel style guidelines. Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11btrfs: Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1)Dulshani Gunawardhana1-4/+2
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix. Signed-off-by: Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: fix btrfs_prev_leaf() previous key computationFilipe David Borba Manana1-4/+8
If we decrement the key type, we must reset its offset to the largest possible offset (u64)-1. If we decrement the key's objectid, then we must reset the key's type and offset to their largest possible values, (u8)-1 and (u64)-1 respectively. Not doing so can make us miss an items in the tree. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: kill unused code in btrfs_search_forwardLiu Bo1-2/+0
After commit de78b51a2852bddccd6535e9e12de65f92787a1e (btrfs: remove cache only arguments from defrag path), @blockptr is no more used. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: remove unused max_key arg from btrfs_search_forwardFilipe David Borba Manana1-1/+0
It is not used for anything. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11btrfs: remove unused parameter from btrfs_header_fsidRoss Kirk1-5/+5
Remove unused parameter, 'eb'. Unused since introduction in 5f39d397dfbe140a14edecd4e73c34ce23c4f9ee Updated to be rebased against current upstream and correct diff supplied this time! Signed-off-by: Ross Kirk <ross.kirk@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11Btrfs: do a full search everytime in btrfs_search_old_slotJosef Bacik1-2/+6
While running some snashot aware defrag tests I noticed I was panicing every once and a while in key_search. This is because of the optimization that says if we find a key at slot 0 it will be at slot 0 all the way down the rest of the tree. This isn't the case for btrfs_search_old_slot since it will likely replay changes to a buffer if something has changed since we took our sequence number. So short circuit this optimization by setting prev_cmp to -1 every time we call key_search so we will do our normal binary search. With this patch I am no longer seeing the panics I was seeing before. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-11-11btrfs: drop unused parameter from btrfs_item_nrRoss Kirk1-17/+17
Remove unused eb parameter from btrfs_item_nr Signed-off-by: Ross Kirk <ross.kirk@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-21Btrfs: fixup error handling in btrfs_reloc_cowJosef Bacik1-2/+5
If we failed to actually allocate the correct size of the extent to relocate we will end up in an infinite loop because we won't return an error, we'll just move on to the next extent. So fix this up by returning an error, and then fix all the callers to return an error up the stack rather than BUG_ON()'ing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: optimize key searches in btrfs_search_slotFilipe David Borba Manana1-2/+40
When the binary search returns 0 (exact match), the target key will necessarily be at slot 0 of all nodes below the current one, so in this case the binary search is not needed because it will always return 0, and we waste time doing it, holding node locks for longer than necessary, etc. Below follow histograms with the times spent on the current approach of doing a binary search when the previous binary search returned 0, and times for the new approach, which directly picks the first item/child node in the leaf/node. Current approach: Count: 6682 Range: 35.000 - 8370.000; Mean: 85.837; Median: 75.000; Stddev: 106.429 Percentiles: 90th: 124.000; 95th: 145.000; 99th: 206.000 35.000 - 61.080: 1235 ################ 61.080 - 106.053: 4207 ##################################################### 106.053 - 183.606: 1122 ############## 183.606 - 317.341: 111 # 317.341 - 547.959: 6 | 547.959 - 8370.000: 1 | Approach proposed by this patch: Count: 6682 Range: 6.000 - 135.000; Mean: 16.690; Median: 16.000; Stddev: 7.160 Percentiles: 90th: 23.000; 95th: 27.000; 99th: 40.000 6.000 - 8.418: 58 # 8.418 - 11.670: 1149 ######################### 11.670 - 16.046: 2418 ##################################################### 16.046 - 21.934: 2098 ############################################## 21.934 - 29.854: 744 ################ 29.854 - 40.511: 154 ### 40.511 - 54.848: 41 # 54.848 - 74.136: 5 | 74.136 - 100.087: 9 | 100.087 - 135.000: 6 | These samples were captured during a run of the btrfs tests 001, 002 and 004 in the xfstests, with a leaf/node size of 4Kb. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: Make btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() return unsigned longGeert Uytterhoeven1-4/+3
Internally, btrfs_header_chunk_tree_uuid() calculates an unsigned long, but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: Make btrfs_header_fsid() return unsigned longGeert Uytterhoeven1-10/+5
Internally, btrfs_header_fsid() calculates an unsigned long, but casts it to a pointer, while all callers cast it to unsigned long again. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: Remove superfluous casts from u64 to unsigned long longGeert Uytterhoeven1-4/+2
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: get rid of sparse warningsStefan Behrens1-3/+3
make C=2 fs/btrfs/ CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ I tried to filter out the warnings for which patches have already been sent to the mailing list, pending for inclusion in btrfs-next. All these changes should be obviously safe. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuseJosef Bacik1-10/+11
If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-09-01Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC when allocating rewind ebsJosef Bacik1-7/+12
There is no reason we can't just set the path to blocking and then do normal GFP_NOFS allocations for these extent buffers. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>