| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We only use this for normal inodes, so don't set it if we're not a
normal inode.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of taking up a whole argument to indicate we're clearing
everything in a range, simply add another EXTENT bit to control this,
and then update all the callers to drop this argument from the
clear_extent_bit variants.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is only used in the case that we are clearing EXTENT_LOCKED, so
infer this value from the bits passed in instead of taking it as an
argument.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug. To avoid false alerts at
least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is
accessed for read outside of lock.
It is used as a fast check and only advisory. In the worst case the
block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but
properly handled.
Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides
where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a
NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks
the full status under a lock.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The extent tree v2 needs a new root for storing all block group items,
the whole feature hasn't been finished yet so we can afford to do some
changes.
My initial proposal years ago just added a new tree rootid, and load it
from tree root, just like what we did for quota/free space tree/uuid/extent
roots.
But the extent tree v2 patches introduced a completely new way to store
block group tree root into super block which is arguably wasteful.
Currently there are only 3 trees stored in super blocks, and they all
have their valid reasons:
- Chunk root
Needed for bootstrap.
- Tree root
Really the entry point for all trees.
- Log root
This is special as log root has to be updated out of existing
transaction mechanism.
There is not even any reason to put block group root into super blocks,
the block group tree is updated at the same time as the old extent tree,
no need for extra bootstrap/out-of-transaction update.
So just move block group root from super block into tree root.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
struct btrfs_caching_ctl::progress and struct
btrfs_block_group::last_byte_to_unpin were previously needed to ensure
that unpin_extent_range() didn't return a range to the free space cache
before the caching thread had a chance to cache that range. However, the
commit "btrfs: fix space cache corruption and potential double
allocations" made it so that we always synchronously cache the block
group at the time that we pin the extent, so this machinery is no longer
necessary.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In contrast to the num_writers and num_extwriters wait events, the
condition for the pending ordered wait event is signaled in a different
context from the wait event itself. The condition signaling occurs in
btrfs_remove_ordered_extent() in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c while the wait
event is implemented in btrfs_commit_transaction() in
fs/btrfs/transaction.c
Thus the thread signaling the condition has to acquire the lockdep map
as a reader at the start of btrfs_remove_ordered_extent() and release it
after it has signaled the condition. In this case some dependencies
might be left out due to the placement of the annotation, but it is
better than no annotation at all.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Add lockdep annotations for the transaction states that have wait
events;
1) TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START
2) TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED
3) TRANS_STATE_SUPER_COMMITTED
4) TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED
The new macros introduced here to annotate the transaction states wait
events have the same effect as the generic lockdep annotation macros.
With the exception of the lockdep annotation for TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START
the transaction thread has to acquire the lockdep maps for the
transaction states as reader after the lockdep map for num_writers is
released so that lockdep does not complain.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Similarly to the num_writers wait event in fs/btrfs/transaction.c add a
lockdep annotation for the num_extwriters wait event.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Annotate the num_writers wait event in fs/btrfs/transaction.c with
lockdep in order to catch deadlocks involving this wait event.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The chained assignments may be convenient to write, but make readability
a bit worse as it's too easy to overlook that there are several values
set on the same line while this is rather an exception. Making it
consistent everywhere avoids surprises.
The pattern where inode times are initialized reuses the first value and
the order is mtime, ctime. In other blocks the assignments are expanded
so the order of variables is similar to the neighboring code.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Track several stats about transaction commit, to be later exported via
sysfs:
- number of commits so far
- duration of the last commit in ns
- maximum commit duration seen so far in ns
- total duration for all commits so far in ns
The update of the commit stats occurs after the commit thread has gone
through all the logic that checks if there is another thread committing
at the same time. This means that we only account for actual commit work
in the commit stats we report and not the time the thread spends waiting
until it is ready to do the commit work.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ioannis Angelakopoulos <iangelak@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 48b36a602a335c184505346b5b37077840660634.
Revert the xarray conversion, there's a problem with potential
sleep-inside-spinlock [1] when calling xa_insert that triggers GFP_NOFS
allocation. The radix tree used the preloading mechanism to avoid
sleeping but this is not available in xarray.
Conversion from spin lock to mutex is possible but at time of rc6 is
riskier than a clean revert.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/cover.1657097693.git.fdmanana@suse.com/
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
… rename it to simply fs_roots and adjust all usages of this object to use
the XArray API, because it is notionally easier to use and understand, as
it provides array semantics, and also takes care of locking for us,
further simplifying the code.
Also do some refactoring, esp. where the API change requires largely
rewriting some functions, anyway.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Niebler <gniebler@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently we use a spin lock to protect the red black tree that we use to
track block groups. Most accesses to that tree are actually read only and
for large filesystems, with thousands of block groups, it actually has
a bad impact on performance, as concurrent read only searches on the tree
are serialized.
Read only searches on the tree are very frequent and done when:
1) Pinning and unpinning extents, as we need to lookup the respective
block group from the tree;
2) Freeing the last reference of a tree block, regardless if we pin the
underlying extent or add it back to free space cache/tree;
3) During NOCOW writes, both buffered IO and direct IO, we need to check
if the block group that contains an extent is read only or not and to
increment the number of NOCOW writers in the block group. For those
operations we need to search for the block group in the tree.
Similarly, after creating the ordered extent for the NOCOW write, we
need to decrement the number of NOCOW writers from the same block
group, which requires searching for it in the tree;
4) Decreasing the number of extent reservations in a block group;
5) When allocating extents and freeing reserved extents;
6) Adding and removing free space to the free space tree;
7) When releasing delalloc bytes during ordered extent completion;
8) When relocating a block group;
9) During fitrim, to iterate over the block groups;
10) etc;
Write accesses to the tree, to add or remove block groups, are much less
frequent as they happen only when allocating a new block group or when
deleting a block group.
We also use the same spin lock to protect the list of currently caching
block groups. Additions to this list are made when we need to cache a
block group, because we don't have a free space cache for it (or we have
but it's invalid), and removals from this list are done when caching of
the block group's free space finishes. These cases are also not very
common, but when they happen, they happen only once when the filesystem
is mounted.
So switch the lock that protects the tree of block groups from a spinning
lock to a read/write lock.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We're passing a root around here, but we only really need the fs_info,
so fix up btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot() to take an fs_info instead,
and then fix up all the callers appropriately.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
With extent tree v2 you will be able to create multiple csum, extent,
and free space trees. They will be used based on the block group, which
will now use the block_group_item->chunk_objectid to point to the set of
global roots that it will use. When allocating new block groups we'll
simply mod the gigabyte offset of the block group against the number of
global roots we have and that will be the block groups global id.
>From there we can take the bytenr that we're modifying in the respective
tree, look up the block group and get that block groups corresponding
global root id. From there we can get to the appropriate global root
for that bytenr.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We are seeing crashes similar to the following trace:
[38.969182] WARNING: CPU: 20 PID: 2105 at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2dc/0x340 [btrfs]
[38.973556] CPU: 20 PID: 2105 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.17.0-rc4 #54
[38.974580] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[38.976539] RIP: 0010:btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2dc/0x340 [btrfs]
[38.980336] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd42e03c20 EFLAGS: 00010206
[38.981218] RAX: ffff96cfc4ede800 RBX: ffff96cfc3ce0000 RCX: 000000000002ca14
[38.982560] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 4cfd109a0bcb5d7f RDI: ffff96cfc3ce0360
[38.983619] RBP: ffff96cfc309c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[38.984678] R10: ffff96cec0000001 R11: ffffe84c80000000 R12: ffff96cfc4ede800
[38.985735] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff96cfc3ce0360
[38.987146] FS: 00007f11c15218c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6dfb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[38.988662] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[38.989398] CR2: 00007ffc922c8e60 CR3: 00000001147a6001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[38.990279] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[38.991219] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[38.992528] Call Trace:
[38.992854] <TASK>
[38.993148] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0 [btrfs]
[38.993941] btrfs_balance+0x78e/0xea0 [btrfs]
[38.994801] ? vsnprintf+0x33c/0x520
[38.995368] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0x351/0x440
[38.996198] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x2b9/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[38.997084] btrfs_ioctl+0x11b0/0x2da0 [btrfs]
[38.997867] ? mod_objcg_state+0xee/0x340
[38.998552] ? seq_release+0x24/0x30
[38.999184] ? proc_nr_files+0x30/0x30
[38.999654] ? call_rcu+0xc8/0x2f0
[39.000228] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[39.000872] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[39.001973] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[39.002566] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
[39.003011] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[39.003735] RIP: 0033:0x7f11c166959b
[39.007324] RSP: 002b:00007fff2543e998 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[39.008521] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f11c1521698 RCX: 00007f11c166959b
[39.009833] RDX: 00007fff2543ea40 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
[39.011270] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000013 R09: 00007f11c16f94e0
[39.012581] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff25440df3
[39.014046] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fff2543ea40 R15: 0000000000000001
[39.015040] </TASK>
[39.015418] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[43.131559] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[43.132234] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2717!
[43.133031] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[43.133702] CPU: 1 PID: 1839 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc4 #54
[43.134863] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[43.136426] RIP: 0010:unpin_extent_range+0x37a/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[43.139913] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd4216bc70 EFLAGS: 00010246
[43.140629] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96cfc34490f8 RCX: 0000000000000001
[43.141604] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: 0000000051d00000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[43.142645] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96cfd07dca50
[43.143669] R10: ffff96cfc46e8a00 R11: fffffffffffec000 R12: 0000000041d00000
[43.144657] R13: ffff96cfc3ce0000 R14: ffffb0dd4216bd08 R15: 0000000000000000
[43.145686] FS: 00007f7657dd68c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6df640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[43.146808] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[43.147584] CR2: 00007f7fe81bf5b0 CR3: 00000001093ee004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[43.148589] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[43.149581] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[43.150559] Call Trace:
[43.150904] <TASK>
[43.151253] btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x88/0x290 [btrfs]
[43.152127] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x74f/0xaa0 [btrfs]
[43.152932] ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1e/0x50 [btrfs]
[43.153786] btrfs_ioctl+0x1edc/0x2da0 [btrfs]
[43.154475] ? __check_object_size+0x150/0x170
[43.155170] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
[43.155753] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[43.156437] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
[43.157456] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
[43.157980] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
[43.158543] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[43.159231] RIP: 0033:0x7f7657f1e59b
[43.161819] RSP: 002b:00007ffda5cd1658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[43.162702] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7657f1e59b
[43.163526] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000009408 RDI: 0000000000000003
[43.164358] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[43.165208] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[43.166029] R13: 00005621b91c3232 R14: 00005621b91ba580 R15: 00007ffda5cd1800
[43.166863] </TASK>
[43.167125] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor pata_acpi ata_piix libata raid6_pq scsi_mod libcrc32c virtio_net virtio_rng net_failover rng_core failover scsi_common
[43.169552] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[43.171226] RIP: 0010:unpin_extent_range+0x37a/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[43.174767] RSP: 0000:ffffb0dd4216bc70 EFLAGS: 00010246
[43.175600] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96cfc34490f8 RCX: 0000000000000001
[43.176468] RDX: 0000000080000001 RSI: 0000000051d00000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[43.177357] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff96cfd07dca50
[43.178271] R10: ffff96cfc46e8a00 R11: fffffffffffec000 R12: 0000000041d00000
[43.179178] R13: ffff96cfc3ce0000 R14: ffffb0dd4216bd08 R15: 0000000000000000
[43.180071] FS: 00007f7657dd68c0(0000) GS:ffff96d6df800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[43.181073] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[43.181808] CR2: 00007fe09905f010 CR3: 00000001093ee004 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[43.182706] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[43.183591] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
We first hit the WARN_ON(rc->block_group->pinned > 0) in
btrfs_relocate_block_group() and then the BUG_ON(!cache) in
unpin_extent_range(). This tells us that we are exiting relocation and
removing the block group with bytes still pinned for that block group.
This is supposed to be impossible: the last thing relocate_block_group()
does is commit the transaction to get rid of pinned extents.
Commit d0c2f4fa555e ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when
waiting for a transaction commit") introduced an optimization so that
commits from fsync don't have to wait for the previous commit to unpin
extents. This was only intended to affect fsync, but it inadvertently
made it possible for any commit to skip waiting for the previous commit
to unpin. This is because if a call to btrfs_commit_transaction() finds
that another thread is already committing the transaction, it waits for
the other thread to complete the commit and then returns. If that other
thread was in fsync, then it completes the commit without completing the
previous commit. This makes the following sequence of events possible:
Thread 1____________________|Thread 2 (fsync)_____________________|Thread 3 (balance)___________________
btrfs_commit_transaction(N) | |
btrfs_run_delayed_refs | |
pin extents | |
... | |
state = UNBLOCKED |btrfs_sync_file |
| btrfs_start_transaction(N + 1) |relocate_block_group
| | btrfs_join_transaction(N + 1)
| btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1) |
... | trans->state = COMMIT_START |
| | btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1)
| | wait_for_commit(N + 1, COMPLETED)
| wait_for_commit(N, SUPER_COMMITTED)|
state = SUPER_COMMITTED | ... |
btrfs_finish_extent_commit| |
unpin_extent_range() | trans->state = COMPLETED |
| | return
| |
... | |Thread 1 isn't done, so pinned > 0
| |and we WARN
| |
| |btrfs_remove_block_group
unpin_extent_range() | |
Thread 3 removed the | |
block group, so we BUG| |
There are other sequences involving SUPER_COMMITTED transactions that
can cause a similar outcome.
We could fix this by making relocation explicitly wait for unpinning,
but there may be other cases that need it. Josef mentioned ENOSPC
flushing and the free space cache inode as other potential victims.
Rather than playing whack-a-mole, this fix is conservative and makes all
commits not in fsync wait for all previous transactions, which is what
the optimization intended.
Fixes: d0c2f4fa555e ("btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We hit a bug with a recovering relocation on mount for one of our file
systems in production. I reproduced this locally by injecting errors
into snapshot delete with balance running at the same time. This
presented as an error while looking up an extent item
WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1501 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:866 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
CPU: 5 PID: 1501 Comm: btrfs-balance Not tainted 5.16.0-rc8+ #8
RIP: 0010:lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x647/0x680
RSP: 0018:ffffae0a023ab960 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000000c RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff943fd2a39b60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0001434088152de0 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000001d05000
R13: ffff943fd2a39b60 R14: ffff943fdb96f2a0 R15: ffff9442fc923000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff944e9eb40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f1157b1fca8 CR3: 000000010f092000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
insert_inline_extent_backref+0x46/0xd0
__btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.0+0x5f/0x200
? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x164/0x190
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x561/0xfa0
? btrfs_search_slot+0x7b4/0xb30
? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x73/0x1f0
? btrfs_update_root+0x1a9/0x2c0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x50/0xa50
? btrfs_update_reloc_root+0x122/0x220
prepare_to_merge+0x29f/0x320
relocate_block_group+0x2b8/0x550
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1a6/0x350
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x27/0xe0
btrfs_balance+0x777/0xe60
balance_kthread+0x35/0x50
? btrfs_balance+0xe60/0xe60
kthread+0x16b/0x190
? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Normally snapshot deletion and relocation are excluded from running at
the same time by the fs_info->cleaner_mutex. However if we had a
pending balance waiting to get the ->cleaner_mutex, and a snapshot
deletion was running, and then the box crashed, we would come up in a
state where we have a half deleted snapshot.
Again, in the normal case the snapshot deletion needs to complete before
relocation can start, but in this case relocation could very well start
before the snapshot deletion completes, as we simply add the root to the
dead roots list and wait for the next time the cleaner runs to clean up
the snapshot.
Fix this by setting a bit on the fs_info if we have any DEAD_ROOT's that
had a pending drop_progress key. If they do then we know we were in the
middle of the drop operation and set a flag on the fs_info. Then
balance can wait until this flag is cleared to start up again.
If there are DEAD_ROOT's that don't have a drop_progress set then we're
safe to start balance right away as we'll be properly protected by the
cleaner_mutex.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When using the flushoncommit mount option, during almost every transaction
commit we trigger a warning from __writeback_inodes_sb_nr():
$ cat fs/fs-writeback.c:
(...)
static void __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb, ...
{
(...)
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
(...)
}
(...)
The trace produced in dmesg looks like the following:
[947.473890] WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 930 at fs/fs-writeback.c:2610 __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
[947.481623] Modules linked in: nfsd nls_cp437 cifs asn1_decoder cifs_arc4 fscache cifs_md4 ipmi_ssif
[947.489571] CPU: 5 PID: 930 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 95.16.3-srb-asrock-00001-g36437ad63879 #186
[947.497969] RIP: 0010:__writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x7e/0xb3
[947.502097] Code: 24 10 4c 89 44 24 18 c6 (...)
[947.519760] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000777e10 EFLAGS: 00010246
[947.523818] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000963300 RCX: 0000000000000000
[947.529765] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000fa51 RDI: ffffc90000777e50
[947.535740] RBP: ffff888101628a90 R08: ffff888100955800 R09: ffff888100956000
[947.541701] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888100963488
[947.547645] R13: ffff888100963000 R14: ffff888112fb7200 R15: ffff888100963460
[947.553621] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88841fd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[947.560537] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[947.565122] CR2: 0000000008be50c4 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000001006e0
[947.571072] Call Trace:
[947.572354] <TASK>
[947.573266] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1f1/0x998
[947.576785] ? start_transaction+0x3ab/0x44e
[947.579867] ? schedule_timeout+0x8a/0xdd
[947.582716] transaction_kthread+0xe9/0x156
[947.585721] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction.isra.0+0x407/0x407
[947.590104] kthread+0x131/0x139
[947.592168] ? set_kthread_struct+0x32/0x32
[947.595174] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[947.597561] </TASK>
[947.598553] ---[ end trace 644721052755541c ]---
This is because we started using writeback_inodes_sb() to flush delalloc
when committing a transaction (when using -o flushoncommit), in order to
avoid deadlocks with filesystem freeze operations. This change was made
by commit ce8ea7cc6eb313 ("btrfs: don't call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots
in flushoncommit"). After that change we started producing that warning,
and every now and then a user reports this since the warning happens too
often, it spams dmesg/syslog, and a user is unsure if this reflects any
problem that might compromise the filesystem's reliability.
We can not just lock the sb->s_umount semaphore before calling
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that would at least deadlock with
filesystem freezing, since at fs/super.c:freeze_super() sync_filesystem()
is called while we are holding that semaphore in write mode, and that can
trigger a transaction commit, resulting in a deadlock. It would also
trigger the same type of deadlock in the unmount path. Possibly, it could
also introduce some other locking dependencies that lockdep would report.
To fix this call try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() instead of
writeback_inodes_sb(), because that will try to read lock sb->s_umount
and then will only call writeback_inodes_sb() if it was able to lock it.
This is fine because the cases where it can't read lock sb->s_umount
are during a filesystem unmount or during a filesystem freeze - in those
cases sb->s_umount is write locked and sync_filesystem() is called, which
calls writeback_inodes_sb(). In other words, in all cases where we can't
take a read lock on sb->s_umount, writeback is already being triggered
elsewhere.
An alternative would be to call btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() with a
number of pages different from LONG_MAX, for example matching the number
of delalloc bytes we currently have, in which case we would end up
starting all delalloc with filemap_fdatawrite_wbc() and not with an
async flush via filemap_flush() - that is only possible after the rather
recent commit e076ab2a2ca70a ("btrfs: shrink delalloc pages instead of
full inodes"). However that creates a whole new can of worms due to new
lock dependencies, which lockdep complains, like for example:
[ 8948.247280] ======================================================
[ 8948.247823] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 8948.248353] 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1 Not tainted
[ 8948.248786] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 8948.249320] kworker/u16:18/933570 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 8948.249812] ffff9b3de1591690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.250638]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 8948.251140] ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.252018]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 8948.252710]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 8948.253343]
-> #2 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.253950] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.254354] start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.254859] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255408] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.255942] btrfs_mksubvol+0x380/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256406] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x81/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.256870] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x17f/0x190 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257413] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 8948.257961] btrfs_ioctl+0x1196/0x3630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.258418] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 8948.258793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.259146] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.259709]
-> #1 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8948.260330] __mutex_lock+0x90/0x900
[ 8948.260692] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261234] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x32f/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 8948.261766] btrfs_set_free_space_cache_v1_active+0x38/0x60 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262379] btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0x119/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 8948.262909] open_ctree+0x1511/0x171e [btrfs]
[ 8948.263359] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs]
[ 8948.263863] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.264242] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.264594] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
[ 8948.265017] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.265462] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 8948.265851] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 8948.266203] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0
[ 8948.266554] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140
[ 8948.266940] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 8948.267300] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 8948.267790]
-> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 8948.268322] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.268733] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.269092] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.269591] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270087] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.270588] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271051] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.271586] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272071] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.272579] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273113] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.273573] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.273942] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.274371] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.274876] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275417] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.275863] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.276438] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.276829] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.277189] kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.277506] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.277868]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 8948.278548] Chain exists of:
sb_internal#2 --> &fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex --> &root->delalloc_mutex
[ 8948.279601] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 8948.280102] CPU0 CPU1
[ 8948.280508] ---- ----
[ 8948.280915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.281271] lock(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex);
[ 8948.281915] lock(&root->delalloc_mutex);
[ 8948.282487] lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 8948.282800]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 8948.283333] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:18/933570:
[ 8948.283750] #0: ffff9b3dc00a9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.284609] #1: ffffa90349dafe70 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d2/0x5a0
[ 8948.285637] #2: ffff9b3e14db5040 (&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x97/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.286674] #3: ffff9b3e09c717d8 (&root->delalloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: start_delalloc_inodes+0x78/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.287596]
stack backtrace:
[ 8948.287975] CPU: 3 PID: 933570 Comm: kworker/u16:18 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc1-btrfs-next-111 #1
[ 8948.288677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 8948.289649] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[ 8948.290298] Call Trace:
[ 8948.290517] <TASK>
[ 8948.290700] dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73
[ 8948.291026] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 8948.291375] ? start_transaction+0x228/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.291826] __lock_acquire+0x12e8/0x2260
[ 8948.292241] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 8948.292714] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.293241] ? lock_is_held_type+0xea/0x140
[ 8948.293601] start_transaction+0x44c/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294055] ? find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294518] find_free_extent+0x141e/0x1590 [btrfs]
[ 8948.294957] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 8948.295312] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x124/0x290 [btrfs]
[ 8948.295813] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x14b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296270] cow_file_range+0x17e/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 8948.296691] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x345/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297175] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x247/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 8948.297678] writepage_delalloc+0xb5/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298123] __extent_writepage+0x156/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.298570] extent_write_cache_pages+0x263/0x460 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299061] extent_writepages+0x76/0x130 [btrfs]
[ 8948.299495] do_writepages+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 8948.299817] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x110
[ 8948.300160] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.300494] filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x68/0x90
[ 8948.300874] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
[ 8948.301243] start_delalloc_inodes+0x17f/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 8948.301706] ? lock_release+0x155/0x4a0
[ 8948.302055] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x194/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302564] flush_space+0x1f2/0x630 [btrfs]
[ 8948.302970] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x108/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[ 8948.303510] process_one_work+0x252/0x5a0
[ 8948.303860] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304221] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0
[ 8948.304543] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 8948.304904] kthread+0xf2/0x120
[ 8948.305184] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 8948.305598] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 8948.305921] </TASK>
It all comes from the fact that btrfs_start_delalloc_roots() takes the
delalloc_root_mutex, in the transaction commit path we are holding a
read lock on one of the superblock's freeze semaphores (via
sb_start_intwrite()), the async reclaim task can also do a call to
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), which ends up triggering writeback with
calls to filemap_fdatawrite_wbc(), resulting in extent allocation which
in turn can call btrfs_start_transaction(), which will result in taking
the freeze semaphore via sb_start_intwrite(), forming a nasty dependency
on all those locks which can be taken in different orders by different
code paths.
So just adopt the simple approach of calling try_to_writeback_inodes_sb()
at btrfs_start_delalloc_flush().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220130005258.GA7465@cuci.nl/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/43acc426-d683-d1b6-729d-c6bc4a2fff4d@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6833930a-08d7-6fbc-0141-eb9cdfd6bb4d@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20190322041731.GF16651@hungrycats.org/
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ add more link reports ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and
then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that
we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump
to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can
result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot:
1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's
list of pending snapshots;
2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first
call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups().
In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our
transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending
snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the
transaction's list;
3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at
all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer
to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task
has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free.
This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the
following warning:
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list
So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the
pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending
snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction()
we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error
returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which
case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can
access it anymore.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We don't allow send and balance/relocation to run in parallel in order
to prevent send failing or silently producing some bad stream. This is
because while send is using an extent (specially metadata) or about to
read a metadata extent and expecting it belongs to a specific parent
node, relocation can run, the transaction used for the relocation is
committed and the extent gets reallocated while send is still using the
extent, so it ends up with a different content than expected. This can
result in just failing to read a metadata extent due to failure of the
validation checks (parent transid, level, etc), failure to find a
backreference for a data extent, and other unexpected failures. Besides
reallocation, there's also a similar problem of an extent getting
discarded when it's unpinned after the transaction used for block group
relocation is committed.
The restriction between balance and send was added in commit 9e967495e0e0
("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"),
kernel 5.3, while the more general restriction between send and relocation
was added in commit 1cea5cf0e664 ("btrfs: ensure relocation never runs
while we have send operations running"), kernel 5.14.
Both send and relocation can be very long running operations. Relocation
because it has to do a lot of IO and expensive backreference lookups in
case there are many snapshots, and send due to read IO when operating on
very large trees. This makes it inconvenient for users and tools to deal
with scheduling both operations.
For zoned filesystem we also have automatic block group relocation, so
send can fail with -EAGAIN when users least expect it or send can end up
delaying the block group relocation for too long. In the future we might
also get the automatic block group relocation for non zoned filesystems.
This change makes it possible for send and relocation to run in parallel.
This is achieved the following way:
1) For all tree searches, send acquires a read lock on the commit root
semaphore;
2) After each tree search, and before releasing the commit root semaphore,
the leaf is cloned and placed in the search path (struct btrfs_path);
3) After releasing the commit root semaphore, the changed_cb() callback
is invoked, which operates on the leaf and writes commands to the pipe
(or file in case send/receive is not used with a pipe). It's important
here to not hold a lock on the commit root semaphore, because if we did
we could deadlock when sending and receiving to the same filesystem
using a pipe - the send task blocks on the pipe because it's full, the
receive task, which is the only consumer of the pipe, triggers a
transaction commit when attempting to create a subvolume or reserve
space for a write operation for example, but the transaction commit
blocks trying to write lock the commit root semaphore, resulting in a
deadlock;
4) Before moving to the next key, or advancing to the next change in case
of an incremental send, check if a transaction used for relocation was
committed (or is about to finish its commit). If so, release the search
path(s) and restart the search, to where we were before, so that we
don't operate on stale extent buffers. The search restarts are always
possible because both the send and parent roots are RO, and no one can
add, remove of update keys (change their offset) in RO trees - the
only exception is deduplication, but that is still not allowed to run
in parallel with send;
5) Periodically check if there is contention on the commit root semaphore,
which means there is a transaction commit trying to write lock it, and
release the semaphore and reschedule if there is contention, so as to
avoid causing any significant delays to transaction commits.
This leaves some room for optimizations for send to have less path
releases and re searching the trees when there's relocation running, but
for now it's kept simple as it performs quite well (on very large trees
with resulting send streams in the order of a few hundred gigabytes).
Test case btrfs/187, from fstests, stresses relocation, send and
deduplication attempting to run in parallel, but without verifying if send
succeeds and if it produces correct streams. A new test case will be added
that exercises relocation happening in parallel with send and then checks
that send succeeds and the resulting streams are correct.
A final note is that for now this still leaves the mutual exclusion
between send operations and deduplication on files belonging to a root
used by send operations. A solution for that will be slightly more complex
but it will eventually be built on top of this change.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We don't set SHAREABLE on the extent root, we don't need to have this
safety check here.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When we start having multiple extent roots we'll need to use a helper to
get to the correct extent_root. Rename fs_info->extent_root to
_extent_root and convert all of the users of the extent root to using
the btrfs_extent_root() helper. This will allow us to easily clean up
the remaining direct accesses in the future.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is a leftover from when we used to independently swap the extent
root's commit root and the fs tree commit roots. At the time I simply
changed the helper to a list_add. There's actually no reason to not add
the extent root to the switch commit root at this point, we don't care
about the order we do the switching since it's all done under the
commit_root_sem.
If we re-mark the extent root dirty after adding it to the
switch_commits list we'll see that BTRFS_ROOT_DIRTY isn't set and then
list_move it back onto the dirty list, and then we'll redo the tree
update and everything will be ok.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Nobody is using this anymore, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The root on the trans->root can be anything, and generally we're
committing from the transaction kthread so it's usually the tree_root.
Change this to just take an fs_info, and to maintain compatibility
simply put the ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID as the root objectid for the
tracepoint. This will allow use to remove trans->root.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Currently we do this awful thing where we get another ref on a trans
handle, async off that handle and commit the transaction from that work.
Because we do this we have to mess with current->journal_info and the
freeze counting stuff.
We already have an async thing to kick for the transaction commit, the
transaction kthread. Replace this work struct with a flag on the
fs_info to tell the kthread to go ahead and commit even if it's before
our timeout. Then we can drastically simplify the async transaction
commit path.
Note: this can be simplified and functionality based on the pending
operation COMMIT.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
[ add note ]
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the
orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the
fs_info. Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and
change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the
same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then
manipulate the block_rsv that is being used.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In the transaction commit path we are acquiring the tree log mutex too
early and we have a stale comment because:
1) It mentions a function named btrfs_commit_tree_roots(), which does not
exists anymore, it was the old name of commit_cowonly_roots(), renamed
a very long time ago by commit 5d4f98a28c7d33 ("Btrfs: Mixed back
reference (FORWARD ROLLING FORMAT CHANGE)"));
2) It mentions that we need to acquire the tree log mutex at that point
to ensure we have no running log writers. That is not correct anymore,
for many years at least, since we are guaranteed that we do not have
any log writers at that point simply because we have set the state of
the transaction to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING and have waited for all
writers to complete - meaning no one can log until we change the state
of the transaction to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED. Any attempts to join the
transaction or start a new one will block until we do that state
transition;
3) The comment mentions a "trans mutex" which doesn't exists since 2011,
commit a4abeea41adf ("Btrfs: kill trans_mutex") removed it;
4) The current use of the tree log mutex is to ensure proper serialization
of super block writes - if someone started a new transaction and uses it
for logging, it will wait for the previous transaction to write its
super block before writing the super block when attempting to sync the
log.
So acquire the tree log mutex only when it's absolutely needed, before
setting the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED, fix and move the
stale comment, add some assertions and new comments where appropriate.
Also, this has no effect on concurrency or performance, since the new
start of the critical section is still when the transaction is in the
state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have a few flags that are inconsistently used to describe the fs in
different states of failure. As of 5963ffcaf383 ("btrfs: always abort
the transaction if we abort a trans handle") we will always set
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR if we abort, so we don't have to check both ABORTED
and ERROR to see if things have gone wrong. Add a helper to check
BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR and then convert all checkers of FS_STATE_ERROR to
use the helper.
The TRANS_ABORTED bit check was added in af7227338135 ("Btrfs: clean up
resources during umount after trans is aborted") but is not actually
specific.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in
exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many
tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the
first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished
their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks
being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate
tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K.
However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of
the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system
chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent
buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not
making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the
subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving
system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it
and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while
the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common.
This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array
exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk
allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the
insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while
under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the
same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates
a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way
we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes.
The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps
reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree.
For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains,
because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree.
Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk
removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes
to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond
to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these
other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree
right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk
allocation and chunk removal do.
The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition
of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and
removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior
that did not change.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When a task attempting to allocate a new chunk verifies that there is not
currently enough free space in the system space_info and there is another
task that allocated a new system chunk but it did not finish yet the
creation of the respective block group, it waits for that other task to
finish creating the block group. This is to avoid exhaustion of the system
chunk array in the superblock, which is limited, when we have a thundering
herd of tasks allocating new chunks. This problem was described and fixed
by commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array
due to concurrent allocations").
However there are two very similar scenarios where this can lead to a
deadlock:
1) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B
to finish creation of the respective system block group. However before
task B ends its transaction handle and finishes the creation of the
system block group, it attempts to allocate another chunk (like a data
chunk for an fallocate operation for a very large range). Task B will
be unable to progress and allocate the new chunk, because task A set
space_info->chunk_alloc to 1 and therefore it loops at
btrfs_chunk_alloc() waiting for task A to finish its chunk allocation
and set space_info->chunk_alloc to 0, but task A is waiting on task B
to finish creation of the new system block group, therefore resulting
in a deadlock;
2) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to
finish creation of the respective system block group. By the time that
task B enter the final phase of block group allocation, which happens
at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it modifies the extent
tree, the device tree or the chunk tree to insert the items for some
new block group, it needs to allocate a new chunk, so it ends up at
btrfs_chunk_alloc() and keeps looping there because task A has set
space_info->chunk_alloc to 1, but task A is waiting for task B to
finish creation of the new system block group and release the reserved
system space, therefore resulting in a deadlock.
In short, the problem is if a task B needs to allocate a new chunk after
it previously allocated a new system chunk and if another task A is
currently waiting for task B to complete the allocation of the new system
chunk.
Unfortunately this deadlock scenario introduced by the previous fix for
the system chunk array exhaustion problem does not have a simple and short
fix, and requires a big change to rework the chunk allocation code so that
chunk btree updates are all made in the first phase of chunk allocation.
And since this deadlock regression is being frequently hit on zoned
filesystems and the system chunk array exhaustion problem is triggered
in more extreme cases (originally observed on PowerPC with a node size
of 64K when running the fallocate tests from stress-ng), revert the
changes from that commit. The next patch in the series, with a subject
of "btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system
chunk array" does the necessary changes to fix the system chunk array
exhaustion problem.
Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210621015922.ewgbffxuawia7liz@naota-xeon/
Fixes: eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When doing a send we don't expect the task to ever start a transaction
after the initial check that verifies if commit roots match the regular
roots. This is because after that we set current->journal_info with a
stub (special value) that signals we are in send context, so that we take
a read lock on an extent buffer when reading it from disk and verifying
it is valid (its generation matches the generation stored in the parent).
This stub was introduced in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75b0bf ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") in order to fix a concurrency issue
between send and balance.
However there is one particular exception where we end up needing to start
a transaction and when this happens it results in a crash with a stack
trace like the following:
[60015.902283] kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 at arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h:44 kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902292] kernel: Modules linked in: uinput rfcomm snd_seq_dummy (...)
[60015.902384] kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 #1
[60015.902387] kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./F2A88XN-WIFI, BIOS F6 12/24/2015
[60015.902389] kernel: RIP: 0010:kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902393] kernel: Code: ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd (...)
[60015.902396] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb583453220 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902399] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9fb583453224
[60015.902401] kernel: RDX: ffff9fb583453224 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[60015.902402] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902404] kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002
[60015.902406] kernel: R13: ffff9fb583453348 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
[60015.902408] kernel: FS: 00007f158e62d8c0(0000) GS:ffff93bd37580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[60015.902410] kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[60015.902412] kernel: CR2: 0000000000000039 CR3: 00000001256d2000 CR4: 00000000000506e0
[60015.902414] kernel: Call Trace:
[60015.902419] kernel: kfence_unprotect+0x13/0x30
[60015.902423] kernel: page_fault_oops+0x89/0x270
[60015.902427] kernel: ? search_module_extables+0xf/0x40
[60015.902431] kernel: ? search_bpf_extables+0x57/0x70
[60015.902435] kernel: kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xd6/0xf0
[60015.902437] kernel: __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x142/0x180
[60015.902440] kernel: exc_page_fault+0x67/0x150
[60015.902445] kernel: asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
[60015.902450] kernel: RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x71/0x580
[60015.902454] kernel: Code: d3 0f 84 92 00 00 00 80 e7 06 0f 85 63 (...)
[60015.902456] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb5834533f8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902458] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
[60015.902460] kernel: RDX: 0000000000000801 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000039
[60015.902462] kernel: RBP: ffff93bc0a7eb800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902463] kernel: R10: 0000000000098a00 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001
[60015.902464] kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff93bc0c92b000 R15: ffff93bc0c92b000
[60015.902468] kernel: btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5d/0x120
[60015.902473] kernel: btrfs_evict_inode+0x2c5/0x3f0
[60015.902476] kernel: evict+0xd1/0x180
[60015.902480] kernel: inode_lru_isolate+0xe7/0x180
[60015.902483] kernel: __list_lru_walk_one+0x77/0x150
[60015.902487] kernel: ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902489] kernel: ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902491] kernel: list_lru_walk_one+0x47/0x70
[60015.902495] kernel: prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x50
[60015.902497] kernel: super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
[60015.902501] kernel: do_shrink_slab+0x142/0x240
[60015.902505] kernel: shrink_slab+0x164/0x280
[60015.902509] kernel: shrink_node+0x2c8/0x6e0
[60015.902512] kernel: do_try_to_free_pages+0xcb/0x4b0
[60015.902514] kernel: try_to_free_pages+0xda/0x190
[60015.902516] kernel: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x373/0xcc0
[60015.902521] kernel: ? __memcg_kmem_charge_page+0xc2/0x1e0
[60015.902525] kernel: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x30a/0x340
[60015.902528] kernel: pipe_write+0x30b/0x5c0
[60015.902531] kernel: ? set_next_entity+0xad/0x1e0
[60015.902534] kernel: ? switch_mm_irqs_off+0x58/0x440
[60015.902538] kernel: __kernel_write+0x13a/0x2b0
[60015.902541] kernel: kernel_write+0x73/0x150
[60015.902543] kernel: send_cmd+0x7b/0xd0
[60015.902545] kernel: send_extent_data+0x5a3/0x6b0
[60015.902549] kernel: process_extent+0x19b/0xed0
[60015.902551] kernel: btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1434/0x17e0
[60015.902554] kernel: ? _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe1/0x100
[60015.902557] kernel: _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xbf/0x100
[60015.902559] kernel: ? enqueue_entity+0x18c/0x7b0
[60015.902562] kernel: btrfs_ioctl+0x185f/0x2f80
[60015.902564] kernel: ? psi_task_change+0x84/0xc0
[60015.902569] kernel: ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40
[60015.902572] kernel: ? check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x70
[60015.902576] kernel: ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x137/0x1e0
[60015.902579] kernel: ? expand_files+0x1cb/0x1d0
[60015.902582] kernel: ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902585] kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902588] kernel: do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[60015.902591] kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[60015.902595] kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f158e38f0ab
[60015.902599] kernel: Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b (...)
[60015.902602] kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffcb2519bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[60015.902605] kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcb251ae00 RCX: 00007f158e38f0ab
[60015.902607] kernel: RDX: 00007ffcb2519cf0 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004
[60015.902608] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00007f158e297640 R09: 00007f158e297640
[60015.902610] kernel: R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[60015.902612] kernel: R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007ffcb251aee0 R15: 0000558c1a83e2a0
[60015.902615] kernel: ---[ end trace 7bbc33e23bb887ae ]---
This happens because when writing to the pipe, by calling kernel_write(),
we end up doing page allocations using GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ACCOUNT as the
gfp flags, which allow reclaim to happen if there is memory pressure. This
allocation happens at fs/pipe.c:pipe_write().
If the reclaim is triggered, inode eviction can be triggered and that in
turn can result in starting a transaction if the inode has a link count
of 0. The transaction start happens early on during eviction, when we call
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() at btrfs_evict_inode(). This happens if
there is currently an open file descriptor for an inode with a link count
of 0 and the reclaim task gets a reference on the inode before that
descriptor is closed, in which case the reclaim task ends up doing the
final iput that triggers the inode eviction.
When we have assertions enabled (CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y), this triggers
the following assertion at transaction.c:start_transaction():
/* Send isn't supposed to start transactions. */
ASSERT(current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB);
And when assertions are not enabled, it triggers a crash since after that
assertion we cast current->journal_info into a transaction handle pointer
and then dereference it:
if (current->journal_info) {
WARN_ON(type & TRANS_EXTWRITERS);
h = current->journal_info;
refcount_inc(&h->use_count);
(...)
Which obviously results in a crash due to an invalid memory access.
The same type of issue can happen during other memory allocations we
do directly in the send code with kmalloc (and friends) as they use
GFP_KERNEL and therefore may trigger reclaim too, which started to
happen since 2016 after commit e780b0d1c1523e ("btrfs: send: use
GFP_KERNEL everywhere").
The issue could be solved by setting up a NOFS context for the entire
send operation so that reclaim could not be triggered when allocating
memory or pages through kernel_write(). However that is not very friendly
and we can in fact get rid of the send stub because:
1) The stub was introduced way back in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75b0bf
("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") to solve an
issue exclusive to when send and balance are running in parallel,
however there were other problems between balance and send and we do
not allow anymore to have balance and send run concurrently since
commit 9e967495e0e0ae ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due
to concurrent relocation"). More generically the issues are between
send and relocation, and that last commit eliminated only the
possibility of having send and balance run concurrently, but shrinking
a device also can trigger relocation, and on zoned filesystems we have
relocation of partially used block groups triggered automatically as
well. The previous patch that has a subject of:
"btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running"
Addresses all the remaining cases that can trigger relocation.
2) We can actually allow starting and even committing transactions while
in a send context if needed because send is not holding any locks that
would block the start or the commit of a transaction.
So get rid of all the logic added by commit a26e8c9f75b0bf ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO"). We can now always call
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate() at verify_parent_transid() since send is
the only case that uses commit roots without having a transaction open or
without holding the commit_root_sem.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJCQCtRQ57=qXo3kygwpwEBOU_CA_eKvdmjP52sU=eFvuVOEGw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
qgroup_account_snapshot() is trying to unlock the not taken
tree_log_mutex in a error path. Since ret != 0 in this case, we can
just return from here.
Fixes: 2a4d84c11a87 ("btrfs: move delayed ref flushing for qgroup into qgroup helper")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Function wait_current_trans_commit_start is now fairly trivial so it can
be inlined in its only caller.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There's only one caller left btrfs_ioctl_start_sync that passes 0, so we
can remove the switch in btrfs_commit_transaction_async.
A cleanup 9babda9f33fd ("btrfs: Remove async_transid from
btrfs_mksubvol/create_subvol/create_snapshot") removed calls that passed
1, so this is a followup.
As this removes last call of wait_current_trans_commit_start_and_unblock,
remove the function as well.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The defrag loop processes leaves in batches and starting transaction for
each. The whole defragmentation on a given root is protected by a bit
but in case the transaction fails, the bit is not cleared
In case the transaction fails the bit would prevent starting
defragmentation again, so make sure it's cleared.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While stress testing our error handling I noticed that sometimes we
would still commit the transaction even though we had aborted the
transaction.
Currently we track if a trans handle has dirtied any metadata, and if it
hasn't we mark the filesystem as having an error (so no new transactions
can be started), but we will allow the current transaction to complete
as we do not mark the transaction itself as having been aborted.
This sounds good in theory, but we were not properly tracking IO errors
in btrfs_finish_ordered_io, and thus committing the transaction with
bogus free space data. This isn't necessarily a problem per-se with the
free space cache, as the other guards in place would have kept us from
accepting the free space cache as valid, but highlights a real world
case where we had a bug and could have corrupted the filesystem because
of it.
This "skip abort on empty trans handle" is nice in theory, but assumes
we have perfect error handling everywhere, which we clearly do not.
Also we do not allow further transactions to be started, so all this
does is save the last transaction that was happening, which doesn't
necessarily gain us anything other than the potential for real
corruption.
Remove this particular bit of code, if we decide we need to abort the
transaction then abort the current one and keep us from doing real harm
to the file system, regardless of whether this specific trans handle
dirtied anything or not.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is a race between a task aborting a transaction during a commit,
a task doing an fsync and the transaction kthread, which leads to an
use-after-free of the log root tree. When this happens, it results in a
stack trace like the following:
BTRFS info (device dm-0): forced readonly
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1958: errno=-5 IO failure
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/mapper/error-test (-5)
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 261 rw 0,0 sector 0xa4e8 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS error (device dm-0): error writing primary super block to device 1
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 261 rw 0,0 sector 0x12e000 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 261 rw 0,0 sector 0x12e008 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 261 rw 0,0 sector 0x12e010 len 4096 err no 10
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in write_all_supers:4110: errno=-5 IO failure (1 errors while writing supers)
BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_sync_log:3308: errno=-5 IO failure
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b68: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
CPU: 2 PID: 2458471 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 5.12.0-rc5-btrfs-next-84 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock+0x139/0xa40
Code: c0 74 19 (...)
RSP: 0018:ffff9f18830d7b00 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b68 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: ffffffffb9c54d13 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff9f18830d7bc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff9f18830d7be0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8c6cd199c040
R13: ffff8c6c95821358 R14: 00000000fffffffb R15: ffff8c6cbcf01358
FS: 00007fa9140c2b80(0000) GS:ffff8c6fac600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa913d52000 CR3: 000000013d2b4003 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
? __btrfs_handle_fs_error+0xde/0x146 [btrfs]
? btrfs_sync_log+0x7c1/0xf20 [btrfs]
? btrfs_sync_log+0x7c1/0xf20 [btrfs]
btrfs_sync_log+0x7c1/0xf20 [btrfs]
btrfs_sync_file+0x40c/0x580 [btrfs]
do_fsync+0x38/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fa9142a55c3
Code: 8b 15 09 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007fff26278d48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000563c83cb4560 RCX: 00007fa9142a55c3
RDX: 00007fff26278cb0 RSI: 00007fff26278cb0 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007fff26278d5c
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000340
R13: 00007fff26278de0 R14: 00007fff26278d96 R15: 0000563c83ca57c0
Modules linked in: btrfs dm_zero dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...)
---[ end trace ee2f1b19327d791d ]---
The steps that lead to this crash are the following:
1) We are at transaction N;
2) We have two tasks with a transaction handle attached to transaction N.
Task A and Task B. Task B is doing an fsync;
3) Task B is at btrfs_sync_log(), and has saved fs_info->log_root_tree
into a local variable named 'log_root_tree' at the top of
btrfs_sync_log(). Task B is about to call write_all_supers(), but
before that...
4) Task A calls btrfs_commit_transaction(), and after it sets the
transaction state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, an error happens before
it waits for the transaction's 'num_writers' counter to reach a value
of 1 (no one else attached to the transaction), so it jumps to the
label "cleanup_transaction";
5) Task A then calls cleanup_transaction(), where it aborts the
transaction, setting BTRFS_FS_STATE_TRANS_ABORTED on fs_info->fs_state,
setting the ->aborted field of the transaction and the handle to an
errno value and also setting BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR on fs_info->fs_state.
After that, at cleanup_transaction(), it deletes the transaction from
the list of transactions (fs_info->trans_list), sets the transaction
to the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING and then waits for the number
of writers to go down to 1, as it's currently 2 (1 for task A and 1
for task B);
6) The transaction kthread is running and sees that BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR
is set in fs_info->fs_state, so it calls btrfs_cleanup_transaction().
There it sees the list fs_info->trans_list is empty, and then proceeds
into calling btrfs_drop_all_logs(), which frees the log root tree with
a call to btrfs_free_log_root_tree();
7) Task B calls write_all_supers() and, shortly after, under the label
'out_wake_log_root', it deferences the pointer stored in
'log_root_tree', which was already freed in the previous step by the
transaction kthread. This results in a use-after-free leading to a
crash.
Fix this by deleting the transaction from the list of transactions at
cleanup_transaction() only after setting the transaction state to
TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING and waiting for all existing tasks that are
attached to the transaction to release their transaction handles.
This makes the transaction kthread wait for all the tasks attached to
the transaction to be done with the transaction before dropping the
log roots and doing other cleanups.
Fixes: ef67963dac255b ("btrfs: drop logs when we've aborted a transaction")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_update_reloc_root will will return errors in the future, so handle
the error properly in commit_fs_roots.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We can create a reloc root when we record the root in the trans, which
can fail for all sorts of different reasons. Propagate this error up
the chain of callers. Future patches will fix the callers of
btrfs_record_root_in_trans() to handle the error.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
record_root_in_trans can currently fail, so handle this failure
properly.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
record_root_in_trans can fail currently, handle this failure properly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
record_root_in_trans can fail currently, so handle this failure
properly.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_record_root_in_trans will return errors in the future, so handle
the error properly in start_transaction.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When we are running out of space for updating the chunk tree, that is,
when we are low on available space in the system space info, if we have
many task concurrently allocating block groups, via fallocate for example,
many of them can end up all allocating new system chunks when only one is
needed. In extreme cases this can lead to exhaustion of the system chunk
array, which has a size limit of 2048 bytes, and results in a transaction
abort with errno EFBIG, producing a trace in dmesg like the following,
which was triggered on a PowerPC machine with a node/leaf size of 64K:
[1359.518899] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[1359.518980] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27)
[1359.519135] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 16463 at ../fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1968 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x340/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[1359.519152] Modules linked in: (...)
[1359.519239] Supported: Yes, External
[1359.519252] CPU: 3 PID: 16463 Comm: stress-ng Tainted: G X 5.3.18-47-default #1 SLE15-SP3
[1359.519274] NIP: c008000000e36fe8 LR: c008000000e36fe4 CTR: 00000000006de8e8
[1359.519293] REGS: c00000056890b700 TRAP: 0700 Tainted: G X (5.3.18-47-default)
[1359.519317] MSR: 800000000282b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 48008222 XER: 00000007
[1359.519356] CFAR: c00000000013e170 IRQMASK: 0
[1359.519356] GPR00: c008000000e36fe4 c00000056890b990 c008000000e83200 0000000000000026
[1359.519356] GPR04: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000d52a3b027651 0000000000000007
[1359.519356] GPR08: 0000000000000003 0000000000000001 0000000000000007 0000000000000000
[1359.519356] GPR12: 0000000000008000 c00000063fe44600 000000001015e028 000000001015dfd0
[1359.519356] GPR16: 000000000000404f 0000000000000001 0000000000010000 0000dd1e287affff
[1359.519356] GPR20: 0000000000000001 c000000637c9a000 ffffffffffffffe5 0000000000000000
[1359.519356] GPR24: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000100 ffffffffffffffc0
[1359.519356] GPR28: c000000637c9a000 c000000630e09230 c000000630e091d8 c000000562188b08
[1359.519561] NIP [c008000000e36fe8] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x340/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[1359.519613] LR [c008000000e36fe4] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x33c/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[1359.519626] Call Trace:
[1359.519671] [c00000056890b990] [c008000000e36fe4] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x33c/0x3c0 [btrfs] (unreliable)
[1359.519729] [c00000056890ba90] [c008000000d68d44] __btrfs_end_transaction+0xbc/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[1359.519782] [c00000056890bae0] [c008000000e309ac] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x154/0x610 [btrfs]
[1359.519844] [c00000056890bba0] [c008000000d8a0fc] btrfs_fallocate+0xe4/0x10e0 [btrfs]
[1359.519891] [c00000056890bd00] [c0000000004a23b4] vfs_fallocate+0x174/0x350
[1359.519929] [c00000056890bd50] [c0000000004a3cf8] ksys_fallocate+0x68/0xf0
[1359.519957] [c00000056890bda0] [c0000000004a3da8] sys_fallocate+0x28/0x40
[1359.519988] [c00000056890bdc0] [c000000000038968] system_call_exception+0xe8/0x170
[1359.520021] [c00000056890be20] [c00000000000cb70] system_call_common+0xf0/0x278
[1359.520037] Instruction dump:
[1359.520049] 7d0049ad 40c2fff4 7c0004ac 71490004 40820024 2f83fffb 419e0048 3c620000
[1359.520082] e863bcb8 7ec4b378 48010d91 e8410018 <0fe00000> 3c820000 e884bcc8 7ec6b378
[1359.520122] ---[ end trace d6c186e151022e20 ]---
The following steps explain how we can end up in this situation:
1) Task A is at check_system_chunk(), either because it is allocating a
new data or metadata block group, at btrfs_chunk_alloc(), or because
it is removing a block group or turning a block group RO. It does not
matter why;
2) Task A sees that there is not enough free space in the system
space_info object, that is 'left' is < 'thresh'. And at this point
the system space_info has a value of 0 for its 'bytes_may_use'
counter;
3) As a consequence task A calls btrfs_alloc_chunk() in order to allocate
a new system block group (chunk) and then reserves 'thresh' bytes in
the chunk block reserve with the call to btrfs_block_rsv_add(). This
changes the chunk block reserve's 'reserved' and 'size' counters by an
amount of 'thresh', and changes the 'bytes_may_use' counter of the
system space_info object from 0 to 'thresh'.
Also during its call to btrfs_alloc_chunk(), we end up increasing the
value of the 'total_bytes' counter of the system space_info object by
8MiB (the size of a system chunk stripe). This happens through the
call chain:
btrfs_alloc_chunk()
create_chunk()
btrfs_make_block_group()
btrfs_update_space_info()
4) After it finishes the first phase of the block group allocation, at
btrfs_chunk_alloc(), task A unlocks the chunk mutex;
5) At this point the new system block group was added to the transaction
handle's list of new block groups, but its block group item, device
items and chunk item were not yet inserted in the extent, device and
chunk trees, respectively. That only happens later when we call
btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() through a call to
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups();
Note that only when we update the chunk tree, through the call to
btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(), we decrement the 'reserved' counter
of the chunk block reserve as we COW/allocate extent buffers,
through:
btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
btrfs_use_block_rsv()
btrfs_block_rsv_use_bytes()
And the system space_info's 'bytes_may_use' is decremented everytime
we allocate an extent buffer for COW operations on the chunk tree,
through:
btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
btrfs_reserve_extent()
find_free_extent()
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
If we end up COWing less chunk btree nodes/leaves than expected, which
is the typical case since the amount of space we reserve is always
pessimistic to account for the worst possible case, we release the
unused space through:
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()
btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata()
btrfs_block_rsv_release()
block_rsv_release_bytes()
btrfs_space_info_free_bytes_may_use()
But before task A gets into btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()...
6) Many other tasks start allocating new block groups through fallocate,
each one does the first phase of block group allocation in a
serialized way, since btrfs_chunk_alloc() takes the chunk mutex
before calling check_system_chunk() and btrfs_alloc_chunk().
However before everyone enters the final phase of the block group
allocation, that is, before calling btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(),
new tasks keep coming to allocate new block groups and while at
check_system_chunk(), the system space_info's 'bytes_may_use' keeps
increasing each time a task reserves space in the chunk block reserve.
This means that eventually some other task can end up not seeing enough
free space in the system space_info and decide to allocate yet another
system chunk.
This may repeat several times if yet more new tasks keep allocating
new block groups before task A, and all the other tasks, finish the
creation of the pending block groups, which is when reserved space
in excess is released. Eventually this can result in exhaustion of
system chunk array in the superblock, with btrfs_add_system_chunk()
returning EFBIG, resulting later in a transaction abort.
Even when we don't reach the extreme case of exhausting the system
array, most, if not all, unnecessarily created system block groups
end up being unused since when finishing creation of the first
pending system block group, the creation of the following ones end
up not needing to COW nodes/leaves of the chunk tree, so we never
allocate and deallocate from them, resulting in them never being
added to the list of unused block groups - as a consequence they
don't get deleted by the cleaner kthread - the only exceptions are
if we unmount and mount the filesystem again, which adds any unused
block groups to the list of unused block groups, if a scrub is
run, which also adds unused block groups to the unused list, and
under some circumstances when using a zoned filesystem or async
discard, which may also add unused block groups to the unused list.
So fix this by:
*) Tracking the number of reserved bytes for the chunk tree per
transaction, which is the sum of reserved chunk bytes by each
transaction handle currently being used;
*) When there is not enough free space in the system space_info,
if there are other transaction handles which reserved chunk space,
wait for some of them to complete in order to have enough excess
reserved space released, and then try again. Otherwise proceed with
the creation of a new system chunk.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Tree manipulating operations like merging nodes often release
once-allocated tree nodes. Such nodes are cleaned so that pages in the
node are not uselessly written out. On zoned volumes, however, such
optimization blocks the following IOs as the cancellation of the write
out of the freed blocks breaks the sequential write sequence expected by
the device.
Introduce a list of clean and unwritten extent buffers that have been
released in a transaction. Redirty the buffers so that
btree_write_cache_pages() can send proper bios to the devices.
Besides it clears the entire content of the extent buffer not to confuse
raw block scanners e.g. 'btrfs check'. By clearing the content,
csum_dirty_buffer() complains about bytenr mismatch, so avoid the
checking and checksum using newly introduced buffer flag
EXTENT_BUFFER_NO_CHECK.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Often an fsync needs to fallback to a transaction commit for several
reasons (to ensure consistency after a power failure, a new block group
was allocated or a temporary error such as ENOMEM or ENOSPC happened).
In that case the log is marked as needing a full commit and any concurrent
tasks attempting to log inodes or commit the log will also fallback to the
transaction commit. When this happens they all wait for the task that first
started the transaction commit to finish the transaction commit - however
they wait until the full transaction commit happens, which is not needed,
as they only need to wait for the superblocks to be persisted and not for
unpinning all the extents pinned during the transaction's lifetime, which
even for short lived transactions can be a few thousand and take some
significant amount of time to complete - for dbench workloads I have
observed up to 4~5 milliseconds of time spent unpinning extents in the
worst cases, and the number of pinned extents was between 2 to 3 thousand.
So allow fsync tasks to skip waiting for the unpinning of extents when
they call btrfs_commit_transaction() and they were not the task that
started the transaction commit (that one has to do it, the alternative
would be to offload the transaction commit to another task so that it
could avoid waiting for the extent unpinning or offload the extent
unpinning to another task).
This patch is part of a patchset comprised of the following patches:
btrfs: remove unnecessary directory inode item update when deleting dir entry
btrfs: stop setting nbytes when filling inode item for logging
btrfs: avoid logging new ancestor inodes when logging new inode
btrfs: skip logging directories already logged when logging all parents
btrfs: skip logging inodes already logged when logging new entries
btrfs: remove unnecessary check_parent_dirs_for_sync()
btrfs: make concurrent fsyncs wait less when waiting for a transaction commit
After applying the entire patchset, dbench shows improvements in respect
to throughput and latency. The script used to measure it is the following:
$ cat dbench-test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdk
MNT=/mnt/sdk
MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd"
MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single"
echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
umount $DEV &> /dev/null
mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV
mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT
dbench -D $MNT -t 300 64
umount $MNT
The test was run on a physical machine with 12 cores (Intel corei7), 64G
of ram, using a NVMe device and a non-debug kernel configuration (Debian's
default configuration).
Before applying patchset, 32 clients:
Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat
----------------------------------------
NTCreateX 9627107 0.153 61.938
Close 7072076 0.001 3.175
Rename 407633 1.222 44.439
Unlink 1943895 0.658 44.440
Deltree 256 17.339 110.891
Mkdir 128 0.003 0.009
Qpathinfo 8725406 0.064 17.850
Qfileinfo 1529516 0.001 2.188
Qfsinfo 1599884 0.002 1.457
Sfileinfo 784200 0.005 3.562
Find 3373513 0.411 30.312
WriteX 4802132 0.053 29.054
ReadX 15089959 0.002 5.801
LockX 31344 0.002 0.425
UnlockX 31344 0.001 0.173
Flush 674724 5.952 341.830
Throughput 1008.02 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=341.833 ms
After applying patchset, 32 clients:
After patchset, with 32 clients:
Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat
----------------------------------------
NTCreateX 9931568 0.111 25.597
Close 7295730 0.001 2.171
Rename 420549 0.982 49.714
Unlink 2005366 0.497 39.015
Deltree 256 11.149 89.242
Mkdir 128 0.002 0.014
Qpathinfo 9001863 0.049 20.761
Qfileinfo 1577730 0.001 2.546
Qfsinfo 1650508 0.002 3.531
Sfileinfo 809031 0.005 5.846
Find 3480259 0.309 23.977
WriteX 4952505 0.043 41.283
ReadX 15568127 0.002 5.476
LockX 32338 0.002 0.978
UnlockX 32338 0.001 2.032
Flush 696017 7.485 228.835
Throughput 1049.91 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=228.847 ms
--> +4.1% throughput, -39.6% max latency
Before applying patchset, 64 clients:
Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat
----------------------------------------
NTCreateX 8956748 0.342 108.312
Close 6579660 0.001 3.823
Rename 379209 2.396 81.897
Unlink 1808625 1.108 131.148
Deltree 256 25.632 172.176
Mkdir 128 0.003 0.018
Qpathinfo 8117615 0.131 55.916
Qfileinfo 1423495 0.001 2.635
Qfsinfo 1488496 0.002 5.412
Sfileinfo 729472 0.007 8.643
Find 3138598 0.855 78.321
WriteX 4470783 0.102 79.442
ReadX 14038139 0.002 7.578
LockX 29158 0.002 0.844
UnlockX 29158 0.001 0.567
Flush 627746 14.168 506.151
Throughput 924.738 MB/sec 64 clients 64 procs max_latency=506.154 ms
After applying patchset, 64 clients:
Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat
----------------------------------------
NTCreateX 9069003 0.303 43.193
Close 6662328 0.001 3.888
Rename 383976 2.194 46.418
Unlink 1831080 1.022 43.873
Deltree 256 24.037 155.763
Mkdir 128 0.002 0.005
Qpathinfo 8219173 0.137 30.233
Qfileinfo 1441203 0.001 3.204
Qfsinfo 1507092 0.002 4.055
Sfileinfo 738775 0.006 5.431
Find 3177874 0.936 38.170
WriteX 4526152 0.084 39.518
ReadX 14213562 0.002 24.760
LockX 29522 0.002 1.221
UnlockX 29522 0.001 0.694
Flush 635652 14.358 422.039
Throughput 990.13 MB/sec 64 clients 64 procs max_latency=422.043 ms
--> +6.8% throughput, -18.1% max latency
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We love running delayed refs in commit_cowonly_roots, but it is a bit
excessive. I was seeing cases of running 3 or 4 refs a few times in a
row during this time. Instead simply:
- update all of the roots first
- then run delayed refs
- then handle the empty block groups case
- and then if we have any more dirty roots do the whole thing again
This allows us to be much more efficient with our delayed ref running,
as we can batch a few more operations at once.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
Josef Bacik
David Sterba
Qu Wenruo
Omar Sandoval
Ioannis Angelakopoulos
Gabriel Niebler
Filipe Manana
Naohiro Aota